Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
74
WHGLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$23.09
Seasonality move
:
7.49%
Day range:
$22.99 - $23.06
52-week range:
$14.65 - $23.25
Dividend yield:
6.63%
P/E ratio:
9.13x
P/S ratio:
0.55x
P/B ratio:
5.62x
Volume:
10.2K
Avg. volume:
36.2K
1-year change:
50.77%
Market cap:
$14.8B
Revenue:
$26B
EPS (TTM):
$2.52
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WHGLY
WH Group Ltd. (HK)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
$1.2M | -$1.17 | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WHGLY
WH Group Ltd. (HK)
|
$23.05 | -- | $14.8B | 9.13x | $0.77 | 6.63% | 0.55x |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
$7.03 | -- | $11.4B | 14.20x | $0.13 | 3.3% | 2.12x |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
$1.40 | -- | $423.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.80x |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
$10.39 | -- | $238.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
$1.93 | -- | $91.9M | 7.95x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.21x |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
$3.74 | -- | $2.3M | 21.37x | $0.00 | 0% | 4.03x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WHGLY
WH Group Ltd. (HK)
|
-- | -0.460 | -- | 0.93x |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
6.35% | -1.213 | -- | 0.22x |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
803% | -1.323 | 5.79% | 0.27x |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -6.504 | -- | 1.89x |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | 0.872 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WHGLY
WH Group Ltd. (HK)
|
-- | $598M | 8.75% | 14.79% | 9.12% | -- |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 12.39% | 13.4% | -- | -- |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
-$146.2K | -$1.5M | -594.71% | -645.4% | -403.83% | -$1.3M |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 37.42% | 37.42% | -- | -- |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
WH Group Ltd. (HK) vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns WHGLY or CRHKY?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a net margin of 5.8% compared to WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s net margin of --. WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s return on equity of 14.79% beat China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WHGLYWH Group Ltd. (HK)-- $0.59 $11B CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.-- -- $5.2B -
What do Analysts Say About WHGLY or CRHKY?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WH Group Ltd. (HK) has higher upside potential than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd., analysts believe WH Group Ltd. (HK) is more attractive than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WHGLYWH Group Ltd. (HK)0 0 0 CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is WHGLY or CRHKY More Risky?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a beta of -0.021, which suggesting that the stock is 102.135% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.016, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.562%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WHGLY or CRHKY?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.63%. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. WH Group Ltd. (HK) pays 47.5% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. pays out 44.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WHGLY or CRHKY?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s net income of $380M is higher than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.13x while China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WH Group Ltd. (HK) is 0.55x versus 2.12x for China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WHGLYWH Group Ltd. (HK)0.55x 9.13x $6.6B $380M CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.2.12x 14.20x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns WHGLY or IMG?
CIMG, Inc. has a net margin of 5.8% compared to WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s net margin of -392.54%. WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s return on equity of 14.79% beat CIMG, Inc.'s return on equity of -645.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WHGLYWH Group Ltd. (HK)-- $0.59 $11B IMGCIMG, Inc.-39.85% -$0.92 $27.5K -
What do Analysts Say About WHGLY or IMG?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CIMG, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11328.57%. Given that CIMG, Inc. has higher upside potential than WH Group Ltd. (HK), analysts believe CIMG, Inc. is more attractive than WH Group Ltd. (HK).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WHGLYWH Group Ltd. (HK)0 0 0 IMGCIMG, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is WHGLY or IMG More Risky?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a beta of -0.021, which suggesting that the stock is 102.135% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CIMG, Inc. has a beta of 1.042, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.154%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WHGLY or IMG?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.63%. CIMG, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WH Group Ltd. (HK) pays 47.5% of its earnings as a dividend. CIMG, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WHGLY or IMG?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than CIMG, Inc. quarterly revenues of $366.9K. WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s net income of $380M is higher than CIMG, Inc.'s net income of -$1.4M. Notably, WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.13x while CIMG, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WH Group Ltd. (HK) is 0.55x versus 2.80x for CIMG, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WHGLYWH Group Ltd. (HK)0.55x 9.13x $6.6B $380M IMGCIMG, Inc.2.80x -- $366.9K -$1.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns WHGLY or PTNM?
Pitanium Ltd. has a net margin of 5.8% compared to WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s net margin of --. WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s return on equity of 14.79% beat Pitanium Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WHGLYWH Group Ltd. (HK)-- $0.59 $11B PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About WHGLY or PTNM?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pitanium Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WH Group Ltd. (HK) has higher upside potential than Pitanium Ltd., analysts believe WH Group Ltd. (HK) is more attractive than Pitanium Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WHGLYWH Group Ltd. (HK)0 0 0 PTNMPitanium Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is WHGLY or PTNM More Risky?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a beta of -0.021, which suggesting that the stock is 102.135% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pitanium Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WHGLY or PTNM?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.63%. Pitanium Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WH Group Ltd. (HK) pays 47.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Pitanium Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WHGLY or PTNM?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than Pitanium Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s net income of $380M is higher than Pitanium Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.13x while Pitanium Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WH Group Ltd. (HK) is 0.55x versus -- for Pitanium Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WHGLYWH Group Ltd. (HK)0.55x 9.13x $6.6B $380M PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns WHGLY or RAY?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a net margin of 5.8% compared to WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s net margin of --. WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s return on equity of 14.79% beat Raytech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 37.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WHGLYWH Group Ltd. (HK)-- $0.59 $11B RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.-- -- $4M -
What do Analysts Say About WHGLY or RAY?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Raytech Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WH Group Ltd. (HK) has higher upside potential than Raytech Holding Ltd., analysts believe WH Group Ltd. (HK) is more attractive than Raytech Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WHGLYWH Group Ltd. (HK)0 0 0 RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is WHGLY or RAY More Risky?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a beta of -0.021, which suggesting that the stock is 102.135% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Raytech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WHGLY or RAY?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.63%. Raytech Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WH Group Ltd. (HK) pays 47.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Raytech Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WHGLY or RAY?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than Raytech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s net income of $380M is higher than Raytech Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.13x while Raytech Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WH Group Ltd. (HK) is 0.55x versus 0.21x for Raytech Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WHGLYWH Group Ltd. (HK)0.55x 9.13x $6.6B $380M RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.0.21x 7.95x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns WHGLY or TWG?
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has a net margin of 5.8% compared to WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s net margin of --. WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s return on equity of 14.79% beat Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WHGLYWH Group Ltd. (HK)-- $0.59 $11B TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About WHGLY or TWG?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WH Group Ltd. (HK) has higher upside potential than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd., analysts believe WH Group Ltd. (HK) is more attractive than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WHGLYWH Group Ltd. (HK)0 0 0 TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is WHGLY or TWG More Risky?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a beta of -0.021, which suggesting that the stock is 102.135% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WHGLY or TWG?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.63%. Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WH Group Ltd. (HK) pays 47.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WHGLY or TWG?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) quarterly revenues are $6.6B, which are larger than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s net income of $380M is higher than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.13x while Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 21.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WH Group Ltd. (HK) is 0.55x versus 4.03x for Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WHGLYWH Group Ltd. (HK)0.55x 9.13x $6.6B $380M TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.4.03x 21.37x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
64
GLTO alert for Dec 26
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 26
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is down 1.54% over the past day.
Sell
27
CDNAF alert for Dec 26
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
