FPAFY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Foods Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.19% beat China Foods Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.61%.

First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Foods Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Pacific Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Foods Ltd., analysts believe First Pacific Co. Ltd. is more attractive than China Foods Ltd..

First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.621, which suggesting that the stock is 37.882% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Foods Ltd. has a beta of 0.339, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.056%.

First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.99%. China Foods Ltd. offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. First Pacific Co. Ltd. pays 19.62% of its earnings as a dividend. China Foods Ltd. pays out 36.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Pacific Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Foods Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Foods Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.70x while China Foods Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Pacific Co. Ltd. is 0.36x versus 0.50x for China Foods Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.19% beat China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.4%.

First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Pacific Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd., analysts believe First Pacific Co. Ltd. is more attractive than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd..

First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.621, which suggesting that the stock is 37.882% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.069, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.908%.

First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.99%. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. First Pacific Co. Ltd. pays 19.62% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. pays out 44.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Pacific Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.70x while China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 13.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Pacific Co. Ltd. is 0.36x versus 2.06x for China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dynasty Fine Wines Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.19% beat Dynasty Fine Wines Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.15%.

First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dynasty Fine Wines Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Pacific Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Dynasty Fine Wines Group Ltd., analysts believe First Pacific Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Dynasty Fine Wines Group Ltd..

First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.621, which suggesting that the stock is 37.882% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dynasty Fine Wines Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.99%. Dynasty Fine Wines Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Pacific Co. Ltd. pays 19.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Dynasty Fine Wines Group Ltd. pays out 14.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Pacific Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Dynasty Fine Wines Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Dynasty Fine Wines Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.70x while Dynasty Fine Wines Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Pacific Co. Ltd. is 0.36x versus 1.63x for Dynasty Fine Wines Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a net margin of -- compared to First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s net margin of 5.8%. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.19% beat WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s return on equity of 14.79%.

First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WH Group Ltd. (HK) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Pacific Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than WH Group Ltd. (HK), analysts believe First Pacific Co. Ltd. is more attractive than WH Group Ltd. (HK).

First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.621, which suggesting that the stock is 37.882% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a beta of -0.035, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.477%.

First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.99%. WH Group Ltd. (HK) offers a yield of 5.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. First Pacific Co. Ltd. pays 19.62% of its earnings as a dividend. WH Group Ltd. (HK) pays out 47.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Pacific Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WH Group Ltd. (HK) quarterly revenues of $6.6B. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s net income of $380M. Notably, First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.70x while WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s PE ratio is 8.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Pacific Co. Ltd. is 0.36x versus 0.61x for WH Group Ltd. (HK). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.