Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
45
FPAFY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$3.99
Seasonality move
:
-3.94%
Day range:
$3.85 - $4.06
52-week range:
$2.63 - $4.44
Dividend yield:
4.25%
P/E ratio:
4.76x
P/S ratio:
0.34x
P/B ratio:
0.90x
Volume:
35.6K
Avg. volume:
43.7K
1-year change:
40.74%
Market cap:
$3.4B
Revenue:
$10.1B
EPS (TTM):
$70.74
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FPAFY
First Pacific Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
$1.2M | -$1.17 | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WHGLY
WH Group Ltd. (HK)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FPAFY
First Pacific Co. Ltd.
|
$3.99 | -- | $3.4B | 4.76x | $0.08 | 4.25% | 0.34x |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
$1.31 | -- | $396.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.62x |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
$10.39 | -- | $238.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
$2.26 | -- | $107.6M | 7.95x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.25x |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
$3.64 | -- | $2.3M | 20.80x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.92x |
|
WHGLY
WH Group Ltd. (HK)
|
$23.09 | -- | $14.8B | 9.14x | $0.77 | 6.62% | 0.55x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FPAFY
First Pacific Co. Ltd.
|
76.15% | 0.062 | -- | 1.05x |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
803% | -1.323 | 5.79% | 0.27x |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -6.504 | -- | 1.89x |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | 0.872 | -- | -- |
|
WHGLY
WH Group Ltd. (HK)
|
-- | -0.460 | -- | 0.93x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FPAFY
First Pacific Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.56% | 5.19% | -- | -- |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
-$146.2K | -$1.5M | -594.71% | -645.4% | -403.83% | -$1.3M |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 37.42% | 37.42% | -- | -- |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WHGLY
WH Group Ltd. (HK)
|
-- | $598M | 8.75% | 14.79% | 9.12% | -- |
First Pacific Co. Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FPAFY or IMG?
CIMG, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s net margin of -392.54%. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.19% beat CIMG, Inc.'s return on equity of -645.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FPAFYFirst Pacific Co. Ltd.-- -- $24.5B IMGCIMG, Inc.-39.85% -$0.92 $27.5K -
What do Analysts Say About FPAFY or IMG?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CIMG, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12113.74%. Given that CIMG, Inc. has higher upside potential than First Pacific Co. Ltd., analysts believe CIMG, Inc. is more attractive than First Pacific Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FPAFYFirst Pacific Co. Ltd.0 0 0 IMGCIMG, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is FPAFY or IMG More Risky?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.653, which suggesting that the stock is 34.695% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CIMG, Inc. has a beta of 1.042, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.154%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FPAFY or IMG?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.25%. CIMG, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Pacific Co. Ltd. pays 19.62% of its earnings as a dividend. CIMG, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FPAFY or IMG?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CIMG, Inc. quarterly revenues of $366.9K. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than CIMG, Inc.'s net income of -$1.4M. Notably, First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.76x while CIMG, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Pacific Co. Ltd. is 0.34x versus 2.62x for CIMG, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FPAFYFirst Pacific Co. Ltd.0.34x 4.76x -- -- IMGCIMG, Inc.2.62x -- $366.9K -$1.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns FPAFY or PTNM?
Pitanium Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.19% beat Pitanium Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FPAFYFirst Pacific Co. Ltd.-- -- $24.5B PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FPAFY or PTNM?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pitanium Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Pacific Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pitanium Ltd., analysts believe First Pacific Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Pitanium Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FPAFYFirst Pacific Co. Ltd.0 0 0 PTNMPitanium Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FPAFY or PTNM More Risky?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.653, which suggesting that the stock is 34.695% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pitanium Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FPAFY or PTNM?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.25%. Pitanium Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Pacific Co. Ltd. pays 19.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Pitanium Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FPAFY or PTNM?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pitanium Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Pitanium Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.76x while Pitanium Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Pacific Co. Ltd. is 0.34x versus -- for Pitanium Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FPAFYFirst Pacific Co. Ltd.0.34x 4.76x -- -- PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FPAFY or RAY?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.19% beat Raytech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 37.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FPAFYFirst Pacific Co. Ltd.-- -- $24.5B RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.-- -- $4M -
What do Analysts Say About FPAFY or RAY?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Raytech Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Pacific Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Raytech Holding Ltd., analysts believe First Pacific Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Raytech Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FPAFYFirst Pacific Co. Ltd.0 0 0 RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FPAFY or RAY More Risky?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.653, which suggesting that the stock is 34.695% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Raytech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FPAFY or RAY?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.25%. Raytech Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Pacific Co. Ltd. pays 19.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Raytech Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FPAFY or RAY?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Raytech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Raytech Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.76x while Raytech Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Pacific Co. Ltd. is 0.34x versus 0.25x for Raytech Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FPAFYFirst Pacific Co. Ltd.0.34x 4.76x -- -- RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.0.25x 7.95x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FPAFY or TWG?
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.19% beat Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FPAFYFirst Pacific Co. Ltd.-- -- $24.5B TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FPAFY or TWG?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Pacific Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd., analysts believe First Pacific Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FPAFYFirst Pacific Co. Ltd.0 0 0 TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FPAFY or TWG More Risky?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.653, which suggesting that the stock is 34.695% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FPAFY or TWG?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.25%. Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Pacific Co. Ltd. pays 19.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FPAFY or TWG?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.76x while Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 20.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Pacific Co. Ltd. is 0.34x versus 3.92x for Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FPAFYFirst Pacific Co. Ltd.0.34x 4.76x -- -- TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.3.92x 20.80x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FPAFY or WHGLY?
WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a net margin of -- compared to First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s net margin of 5.8%. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.19% beat WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s return on equity of 14.79%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FPAFYFirst Pacific Co. Ltd.-- -- $24.5B WHGLYWH Group Ltd. (HK)-- $0.59 $11B -
What do Analysts Say About FPAFY or WHGLY?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WH Group Ltd. (HK) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that First Pacific Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than WH Group Ltd. (HK), analysts believe First Pacific Co. Ltd. is more attractive than WH Group Ltd. (HK).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FPAFYFirst Pacific Co. Ltd.0 0 0 WHGLYWH Group Ltd. (HK)0 0 0 -
Is FPAFY or WHGLY More Risky?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.653, which suggesting that the stock is 34.695% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WH Group Ltd. (HK) has a beta of -0.021, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.135%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FPAFY or WHGLY?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.25%. WH Group Ltd. (HK) offers a yield of 6.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. First Pacific Co. Ltd. pays 19.62% of its earnings as a dividend. WH Group Ltd. (HK) pays out 47.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FPAFY or WHGLY?
First Pacific Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WH Group Ltd. (HK) quarterly revenues of $6.6B. First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s net income of $380M. Notably, First Pacific Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.76x while WH Group Ltd. (HK)'s PE ratio is 9.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Pacific Co. Ltd. is 0.34x versus 0.55x for WH Group Ltd. (HK). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FPAFYFirst Pacific Co. Ltd.0.34x 4.76x -- -- WHGLYWH Group Ltd. (HK)0.55x 9.14x $6.6B $380M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
