WCHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Winchester Holding Group's net margin of -600505.41%. Winchester Holding Group's return on equity of -- beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s return on equity of -553.9%.

Winchester Holding Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 346.43%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has higher upside potential than Winchester Holding Group, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. is more attractive than Winchester Holding Group.

Winchester Holding Group has a beta of 19.498, which suggesting that the stock is 1849.816% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. has a beta of 5.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 400.215%.

Winchester Holding Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Winchester Holding Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Winchester Holding Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc. quarterly revenues of $37K. Winchester Holding Group's net income of -- is lower than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s net income of -$222.2M. Notably, Winchester Holding Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winchester Holding Group is 427.69x versus 169.46x for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Winchester Holding Group's net margin of -290.7%. Winchester Holding Group's return on equity of -- beat Lucid Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -52.42%.

Winchester Holding Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lucid Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $18.06 which suggests that it could grow by 52.75%. Given that Lucid Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Winchester Holding Group, analysts believe Lucid Group, Inc. is more attractive than Winchester Holding Group.

Winchester Holding Group has a beta of 19.498, which suggesting that the stock is 1849.816% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.52%.

Winchester Holding Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Winchester Holding Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Winchester Holding Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lucid Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $336.6M. Winchester Holding Group's net income of -- is lower than Lucid Group, Inc.'s net income of -$978.4M. Notably, Winchester Holding Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winchester Holding Group is 427.69x versus 18.01x for Lucid Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workhorse Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Winchester Holding Group's net margin of -328.21%. Winchester Holding Group's return on equity of -- beat Workhorse Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -181.65%.

Winchester Holding Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Workhorse Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $0.65 which suggests that it could grow by 44.98%. Given that Workhorse Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Winchester Holding Group, analysts believe Workhorse Group, Inc. is more attractive than Winchester Holding Group.

Winchester Holding Group has a beta of 19.498, which suggesting that the stock is 1849.816% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.326, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.607%.

Winchester Holding Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workhorse Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Winchester Holding Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Winchester Holding Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Workhorse Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Winchester Holding Group's net income of -- is lower than Workhorse Group, Inc.'s net income of -$7.8M. Notably, Winchester Holding Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workhorse Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Winchester Holding Group is 427.69x versus 0.32x for Workhorse Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.