Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
22
VOPKF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$43.70
Seasonality move
:
1.35%
Day range:
$43.70 - $43.70
52-week range:
$37.60 - $50.60
Dividend yield:
4.16%
P/E ratio:
9.89x
P/S ratio:
3.58x
P/B ratio:
1.66x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
459
1-year change:
-3.82%
Market cap:
$5B
Revenue:
$1.4B
EPS (TTM):
$4.50
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VOPKF
Royal Vopak NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BRN
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CKX
CKX Lands, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EPM
Evolution Petroleum Corp.
|
$21.8M | $0.01 | 7.52% | -83.77% | $5.14 |
|
FUGRF
Fugro NV
|
$509.5M | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBFFY
SBM Offshore NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VOPKF
Royal Vopak NV
|
$43.70 | -- | $5B | 9.89x | $1.82 | 4.16% | 3.58x |
|
BRN
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
|
$1.14 | -- | $14.3M | -- | $0.02 | 0% | 0.81x |
|
CKX
CKX Lands, Inc.
|
$9.15 | -- | $18.8M | 39.35x | $0.00 | 0% | 20.79x |
|
EPM
Evolution Petroleum Corp.
|
$3.43 | $5.14 | $119M | 130.65x | $0.12 | 13.99% | 1.35x |
|
FUGRF
Fugro NV
|
$11.23 | -- | $1.2B | 7.46x | $0.85 | 7.61% | 0.56x |
|
SBFFY
SBM Offshore NV
|
$28.81 | -- | $4.9B | 14.19x | $0.98 | 3.39% | 0.94x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VOPKF
Royal Vopak NV
|
42.67% | 0.692 | -- | 0.65x |
|
BRN
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
|
2.38% | 0.246 | 1.3% | 0.96x |
|
CKX
CKX Lands, Inc.
|
-- | 0.200 | -- | 35.64x |
|
EPM
Evolution Petroleum Corp.
|
43.42% | 0.817 | 31.76% | 0.51x |
|
FUGRF
Fugro NV
|
-- | 1.206 | -- | -- |
|
SBFFY
SBM Offshore NV
|
69.73% | 1.028 | -- | 1.70x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VOPKF
Royal Vopak NV
|
-- | -- | 9.25% | 15.35% | -- | -- |
|
BRN
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
|
-$44K | -$1.8M | -73% | -74.23% | -59.56% | -$980K |
|
CKX
CKX Lands, Inc.
|
$214K | $27.2K | 2.54% | 2.54% | 11.69% | $242.3K |
|
EPM
Evolution Petroleum Corp.
|
$2.2M | -$85K | -0.12% | -0.19% | -0.4% | -$12.9M |
|
FUGRF
Fugro NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBFFY
SBM Offshore NV
|
-- | -- | 2.35% | 6.06% | -- | -- |
Royal Vopak NV vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns VOPKF or BRN?
Barnwell Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Royal Vopak NV's net margin of -81.01%. Royal Vopak NV's return on equity of 15.35% beat Barnwell Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -74.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VOPKFRoyal Vopak NV-- -- $6.2B BRNBarnwell Industries, Inc.-1.47% -$0.24 $7.2M -
What do Analysts Say About VOPKF or BRN?
Royal Vopak NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Barnwell Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Royal Vopak NV has higher upside potential than Barnwell Industries, Inc., analysts believe Royal Vopak NV is more attractive than Barnwell Industries, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VOPKFRoyal Vopak NV0 0 0 BRNBarnwell Industries, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is VOPKF or BRN More Risky?
Royal Vopak NV has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Barnwell Industries, Inc. has a beta of -0.557, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 155.668%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VOPKF or BRN?
Royal Vopak NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.16%. Barnwell Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Royal Vopak NV pays 51.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Barnwell Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Vopak NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VOPKF or BRN?
Royal Vopak NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Barnwell Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3M. Royal Vopak NV's net income of -- is lower than Barnwell Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Royal Vopak NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.89x while Barnwell Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Vopak NV is 3.58x versus 0.81x for Barnwell Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VOPKFRoyal Vopak NV3.58x 9.89x -- -- BRNBarnwell Industries, Inc.0.81x -- $3M -$2.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns VOPKF or CKX?
CKX Lands, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Royal Vopak NV's net margin of 71.5%. Royal Vopak NV's return on equity of 15.35% beat CKX Lands, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.54%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VOPKFRoyal Vopak NV-- -- $6.2B CKXCKX Lands, Inc.92% $0.08 $18.9M -
What do Analysts Say About VOPKF or CKX?
Royal Vopak NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CKX Lands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Royal Vopak NV has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, Inc., analysts believe Royal Vopak NV is more attractive than CKX Lands, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VOPKFRoyal Vopak NV0 0 0 CKXCKX Lands, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is VOPKF or CKX More Risky?
Royal Vopak NV has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands, Inc. has a beta of -0.209, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.927%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VOPKF or CKX?
Royal Vopak NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.16%. CKX Lands, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Royal Vopak NV pays 51.34% of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Vopak NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VOPKF or CKX?
Royal Vopak NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CKX Lands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $232.6K. Royal Vopak NV's net income of -- is lower than CKX Lands, Inc.'s net income of $166.3K. Notably, Royal Vopak NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.89x while CKX Lands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Vopak NV is 3.58x versus 20.79x for CKX Lands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VOPKFRoyal Vopak NV3.58x 9.89x -- -- CKXCKX Lands, Inc.20.79x 39.35x $232.6K $166.3K
-
Which has Higher Returns VOPKF or EPM?
Evolution Petroleum Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Royal Vopak NV's net margin of 3.49%. Royal Vopak NV's return on equity of 15.35% beat Evolution Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of -0.19%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VOPKFRoyal Vopak NV-- -- $6.2B EPMEvolution Petroleum Corp.10.52% $0.02 $122.2M -
What do Analysts Say About VOPKF or EPM?
Royal Vopak NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.14 which suggests that it could grow by 49.78%. Given that Evolution Petroleum Corp. has higher upside potential than Royal Vopak NV, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum Corp. is more attractive than Royal Vopak NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VOPKFRoyal Vopak NV0 0 0 EPMEvolution Petroleum Corp.3 1 0 -
Is VOPKF or EPM More Risky?
Royal Vopak NV has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 0.288, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.193%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VOPKF or EPM?
Royal Vopak NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.16%. Evolution Petroleum Corp. offers a yield of 13.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Royal Vopak NV pays 51.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum Corp. pays out 1445.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Vopak NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum Corp.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VOPKF or EPM?
Royal Vopak NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evolution Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues of $21.3M. Royal Vopak NV's net income of -- is lower than Evolution Petroleum Corp.'s net income of $742K. Notably, Royal Vopak NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.89x while Evolution Petroleum Corp.'s PE ratio is 130.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Vopak NV is 3.58x versus 1.35x for Evolution Petroleum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VOPKFRoyal Vopak NV3.58x 9.89x -- -- EPMEvolution Petroleum Corp.1.35x 130.65x $21.3M $742K
-
Which has Higher Returns VOPKF or FUGRF?
Fugro NV has a net margin of -- compared to Royal Vopak NV's net margin of --. Royal Vopak NV's return on equity of 15.35% beat Fugro NV's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VOPKFRoyal Vopak NV-- -- $6.2B FUGRFFugro NV-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About VOPKF or FUGRF?
Royal Vopak NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fugro NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Royal Vopak NV has higher upside potential than Fugro NV, analysts believe Royal Vopak NV is more attractive than Fugro NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VOPKFRoyal Vopak NV0 0 0 FUGRFFugro NV0 0 0 -
Is VOPKF or FUGRF More Risky?
Royal Vopak NV has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fugro NV has a beta of -0.058, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.845%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VOPKF or FUGRF?
Royal Vopak NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.16%. Fugro NV offers a yield of 7.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Royal Vopak NV pays 51.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Fugro NV pays out 30.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VOPKF or FUGRF?
Royal Vopak NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fugro NV quarterly revenues of --. Royal Vopak NV's net income of -- is lower than Fugro NV's net income of --. Notably, Royal Vopak NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.89x while Fugro NV's PE ratio is 7.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Vopak NV is 3.58x versus 0.56x for Fugro NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VOPKFRoyal Vopak NV3.58x 9.89x -- -- FUGRFFugro NV0.56x 7.46x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns VOPKF or SBFFY?
SBM Offshore NV has a net margin of -- compared to Royal Vopak NV's net margin of --. Royal Vopak NV's return on equity of 15.35% beat SBM Offshore NV's return on equity of 6.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VOPKFRoyal Vopak NV-- -- $6.2B SBFFYSBM Offshore NV-- -- $15.1B -
What do Analysts Say About VOPKF or SBFFY?
Royal Vopak NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SBM Offshore NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Royal Vopak NV has higher upside potential than SBM Offshore NV, analysts believe Royal Vopak NV is more attractive than SBM Offshore NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VOPKFRoyal Vopak NV0 0 0 SBFFYSBM Offshore NV0 0 0 -
Is VOPKF or SBFFY More Risky?
Royal Vopak NV has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBM Offshore NV has a beta of 0.234, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.611%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VOPKF or SBFFY?
Royal Vopak NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.16%. SBM Offshore NV offers a yield of 3.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Royal Vopak NV pays 51.34% of its earnings as a dividend. SBM Offshore NV pays out 80.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VOPKF or SBFFY?
Royal Vopak NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SBM Offshore NV quarterly revenues of --. Royal Vopak NV's net income of -- is lower than SBM Offshore NV's net income of --. Notably, Royal Vopak NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.89x while SBM Offshore NV's PE ratio is 14.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Vopak NV is 3.58x versus 0.94x for SBM Offshore NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VOPKFRoyal Vopak NV3.58x 9.89x -- -- SBFFYSBM Offshore NV0.94x 14.19x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
52
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
64
RGC alert for Jan 6
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 22.74% over the past day.
Buy
73
INOD alert for Jan 6
Innodata, Inc. [INOD] is up 4.84% over the past day.
Buy
65
AVAV alert for Jan 6
AeroVironment, Inc. [AVAV] is up 6.62% over the past day.
