FUGRF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CKX Lands, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Fugro NV's net margin of 71.5%. Fugro NV's return on equity of -- beat CKX Lands, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.54%.

Fugro NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CKX Lands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fugro NV has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, Inc., analysts believe Fugro NV is more attractive than CKX Lands, Inc..

Fugro NV has a beta of -0.058, which suggesting that the stock is 105.845% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands, Inc. has a beta of -0.209, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.927%.

Fugro NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.61%. CKX Lands, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fugro NV pays 30.69% of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fugro NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fugro NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CKX Lands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $232.6K. Fugro NV's net income of -- is lower than CKX Lands, Inc.'s net income of $166.3K. Notably, Fugro NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.46x while CKX Lands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fugro NV is 0.56x versus 20.79x for CKX Lands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evolution Petroleum Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Fugro NV's net margin of 3.49%. Fugro NV's return on equity of -- beat Evolution Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of -0.19%.

Fugro NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.14 which suggests that it could grow by 41.14%. Given that Evolution Petroleum Corp. has higher upside potential than Fugro NV, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum Corp. is more attractive than Fugro NV.

Fugro NV has a beta of -0.058, which suggesting that the stock is 105.845% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 0.288, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.193%.

Fugro NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.61%. Evolution Petroleum Corp. offers a yield of 13.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Fugro NV pays 30.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum Corp. pays out 1445.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Fugro NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum Corp.'s is not.

Fugro NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evolution Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues of $21.3M. Fugro NV's net income of -- is lower than Evolution Petroleum Corp.'s net income of $742K. Notably, Fugro NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.46x while Evolution Petroleum Corp.'s PE ratio is 130.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fugro NV is 0.56x versus 1.43x for Evolution Petroleum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBM Offshore NV has a net margin of -- compared to Fugro NV's net margin of --. Fugro NV's return on equity of -- beat SBM Offshore NV's return on equity of 6.06%.

Fugro NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SBM Offshore NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fugro NV has higher upside potential than SBM Offshore NV, analysts believe Fugro NV is more attractive than SBM Offshore NV.

Fugro NV has a beta of -0.058, which suggesting that the stock is 105.845% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBM Offshore NV has a beta of 0.234, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.611%.

Fugro NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.61%. SBM Offshore NV offers a yield of 3.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Fugro NV pays 30.69% of its earnings as a dividend. SBM Offshore NV pays out 80.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fugro NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SBM Offshore NV quarterly revenues of --. Fugro NV's net income of -- is lower than SBM Offshore NV's net income of --. Notably, Fugro NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.46x while SBM Offshore NV's PE ratio is 14.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fugro NV is 0.56x versus 0.94x for SBM Offshore NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Royal Vopak NV has a net margin of -- compared to Fugro NV's net margin of --. Fugro NV's return on equity of -- beat Royal Vopak NV's return on equity of 15.35%.

Fugro NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Royal Vopak NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fugro NV has higher upside potential than Royal Vopak NV, analysts believe Fugro NV is more attractive than Royal Vopak NV.

Fugro NV has a beta of -0.058, which suggesting that the stock is 105.845% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Vopak NV has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.631%.

Fugro NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.61%. Royal Vopak NV offers a yield of 4.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. Fugro NV pays 30.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Vopak NV pays out 51.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fugro NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Royal Vopak NV quarterly revenues of --. Fugro NV's net income of -- is lower than Royal Vopak NV's net income of --. Notably, Fugro NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.46x while Royal Vopak NV's PE ratio is 9.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fugro NV is 0.56x versus 3.58x for Royal Vopak NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.