What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Buy
54
SBFFY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.50
Seasonality move
:
0.43%
Day range:
$28.63 - $28.63
52-week range:
$17.00 - $30.40
Dividend yield:
3.41%
P/E ratio:
14.10x
P/S ratio:
0.94x
P/B ratio:
1.10x
Volume:
80
Avg. volume:
610
1-year change:
69.41%
Market cap:
$4.9B
Revenue:
$4.8B
EPS (TTM):
$2.06
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SBFFY
SBM Offshore NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BRN
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CKX
CKX Lands, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EPM
Evolution Petroleum Corp.
|
$21.7M | $0.01 | 7.52% | -83.77% | $5.08 |
|
FUGRF
Fugro NV
|
$607.2M | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VOPKF
Royal Vopak NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SBFFY
SBM Offshore NV
|
$28.63 | -- | $4.9B | 14.10x | $0.98 | 3.41% | 0.94x |
|
BRN
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
|
$1.08 | -- | $10.9M | -- | $0.02 | 0% | 0.70x |
|
CKX
CKX Lands, Inc.
|
$9.35 | -- | $19.2M | 40.22x | $0.00 | 0% | 21.25x |
|
EPM
Evolution Petroleum Corp.
|
$4.09 | $5.08 | $141.9M | 130.65x | $0.12 | 11.74% | 1.61x |
|
FUGRF
Fugro NV
|
$10.00 | -- | $1.1B | 7.49x | $0.85 | 8.55% | 0.50x |
|
VOPKF
Royal Vopak NV
|
$44.00 | -- | $5B | 9.81x | $1.82 | 4.13% | 3.61x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SBFFY
SBM Offshore NV
|
69.73% | 1.256 | -- | 1.70x |
|
BRN
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
|
2.46% | 0.578 | 1.9% | 0.57x |
|
CKX
CKX Lands, Inc.
|
-- | 0.004 | -- | 35.64x |
|
EPM
Evolution Petroleum Corp.
|
43.42% | 0.887 | 31.76% | 0.51x |
|
FUGRF
Fugro NV
|
-- | 1.747 | -- | -- |
|
VOPKF
Royal Vopak NV
|
42.67% | 0.617 | -- | 0.65x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SBFFY
SBM Offshore NV
|
-- | -- | 2.35% | 6.06% | -- | -- |
|
BRN
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
|
$266K | -$1.6M | -58.62% | -59.32% | -50.19% | -$622K |
|
CKX
CKX Lands, Inc.
|
$214K | $27.2K | 2.54% | 2.54% | 11.69% | $242.3K |
|
EPM
Evolution Petroleum Corp.
|
$2.2M | -$85K | -0.12% | -0.19% | -0.4% | -$12.9M |
|
FUGRF
Fugro NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VOPKF
Royal Vopak NV
|
-- | -- | 9.25% | 15.35% | -- | -- |
SBM Offshore NV vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SBFFY or BRN?
Barnwell Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to SBM Offshore NV's net margin of -48.65%. SBM Offshore NV's return on equity of 6.06% beat Barnwell Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -59.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SBFFYSBM Offshore NV-- -- $15.1B BRNBarnwell Industries, Inc.8.33% -$0.15 $8.8M -
What do Analysts Say About SBFFY or BRN?
SBM Offshore NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Barnwell Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SBM Offshore NV has higher upside potential than Barnwell Industries, Inc., analysts believe SBM Offshore NV is more attractive than Barnwell Industries, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SBFFYSBM Offshore NV0 0 0 BRNBarnwell Industries, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SBFFY or BRN More Risky?
SBM Offshore NV has a beta of 0.229, which suggesting that the stock is 77.14% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Barnwell Industries, Inc. has a beta of -0.537, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 153.662%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SBFFY or BRN?
SBM Offshore NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. Barnwell Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. SBM Offshore NV pays 80.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Barnwell Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SBM Offshore NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SBFFY or BRN?
SBM Offshore NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Barnwell Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2M. SBM Offshore NV's net income of -- is lower than Barnwell Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, SBM Offshore NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.10x while Barnwell Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBM Offshore NV is 0.94x versus 0.70x for Barnwell Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SBFFYSBM Offshore NV0.94x 14.10x -- -- BRNBarnwell Industries, Inc.0.70x -- $3.2M -$1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns SBFFY or CKX?
CKX Lands, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to SBM Offshore NV's net margin of 71.5%. SBM Offshore NV's return on equity of 6.06% beat CKX Lands, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.54%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SBFFYSBM Offshore NV-- -- $15.1B CKXCKX Lands, Inc.92% $0.08 $18.9M -
What do Analysts Say About SBFFY or CKX?
SBM Offshore NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CKX Lands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SBM Offshore NV has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, Inc., analysts believe SBM Offshore NV is more attractive than CKX Lands, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SBFFYSBM Offshore NV0 0 0 CKXCKX Lands, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SBFFY or CKX More Risky?
SBM Offshore NV has a beta of 0.229, which suggesting that the stock is 77.14% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands, Inc. has a beta of -0.206, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.592%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SBFFY or CKX?
SBM Offshore NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. CKX Lands, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SBM Offshore NV pays 80.75% of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SBM Offshore NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SBFFY or CKX?
SBM Offshore NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CKX Lands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $232.6K. SBM Offshore NV's net income of -- is lower than CKX Lands, Inc.'s net income of $166.3K. Notably, SBM Offshore NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.10x while CKX Lands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 40.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBM Offshore NV is 0.94x versus 21.25x for CKX Lands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SBFFYSBM Offshore NV0.94x 14.10x -- -- CKXCKX Lands, Inc.21.25x 40.22x $232.6K $166.3K
-
Which has Higher Returns SBFFY or EPM?
Evolution Petroleum Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to SBM Offshore NV's net margin of 3.49%. SBM Offshore NV's return on equity of 6.06% beat Evolution Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of -0.19%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SBFFYSBM Offshore NV-- -- $15.1B EPMEvolution Petroleum Corp.10.52% $0.02 $122.2M -
What do Analysts Say About SBFFY or EPM?
SBM Offshore NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.08 which suggests that it could grow by 24.29%. Given that Evolution Petroleum Corp. has higher upside potential than SBM Offshore NV, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum Corp. is more attractive than SBM Offshore NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SBFFYSBM Offshore NV0 0 0 EPMEvolution Petroleum Corp.2 1 0 -
Is SBFFY or EPM More Risky?
SBM Offshore NV has a beta of 0.229, which suggesting that the stock is 77.14% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.913%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SBFFY or EPM?
SBM Offshore NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. Evolution Petroleum Corp. offers a yield of 11.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. SBM Offshore NV pays 80.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum Corp. pays out 1445.78% of its earnings as a dividend. SBM Offshore NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum Corp.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SBFFY or EPM?
SBM Offshore NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evolution Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues of $21.3M. SBM Offshore NV's net income of -- is lower than Evolution Petroleum Corp.'s net income of $742K. Notably, SBM Offshore NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.10x while Evolution Petroleum Corp.'s PE ratio is 130.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBM Offshore NV is 0.94x versus 1.61x for Evolution Petroleum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SBFFYSBM Offshore NV0.94x 14.10x -- -- EPMEvolution Petroleum Corp.1.61x 130.65x $21.3M $742K
-
Which has Higher Returns SBFFY or FUGRF?
Fugro NV has a net margin of -- compared to SBM Offshore NV's net margin of --. SBM Offshore NV's return on equity of 6.06% beat Fugro NV's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SBFFYSBM Offshore NV-- -- $15.1B FUGRFFugro NV-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SBFFY or FUGRF?
SBM Offshore NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fugro NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SBM Offshore NV has higher upside potential than Fugro NV, analysts believe SBM Offshore NV is more attractive than Fugro NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SBFFYSBM Offshore NV0 0 0 FUGRFFugro NV0 0 0 -
Is SBFFY or FUGRF More Risky?
SBM Offshore NV has a beta of 0.229, which suggesting that the stock is 77.14% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fugro NV has a beta of 0.145, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.535%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SBFFY or FUGRF?
SBM Offshore NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. Fugro NV offers a yield of 8.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. SBM Offshore NV pays 80.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Fugro NV pays out 30.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SBFFY or FUGRF?
SBM Offshore NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fugro NV quarterly revenues of --. SBM Offshore NV's net income of -- is lower than Fugro NV's net income of --. Notably, SBM Offshore NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.10x while Fugro NV's PE ratio is 7.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBM Offshore NV is 0.94x versus 0.50x for Fugro NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SBFFYSBM Offshore NV0.94x 14.10x -- -- FUGRFFugro NV0.50x 7.49x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SBFFY or VOPKF?
Royal Vopak NV has a net margin of -- compared to SBM Offshore NV's net margin of --. SBM Offshore NV's return on equity of 6.06% beat Royal Vopak NV's return on equity of 15.35%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SBFFYSBM Offshore NV-- -- $15.1B VOPKFRoyal Vopak NV-- -- $6.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SBFFY or VOPKF?
SBM Offshore NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Royal Vopak NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SBM Offshore NV has higher upside potential than Royal Vopak NV, analysts believe SBM Offshore NV is more attractive than Royal Vopak NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SBFFYSBM Offshore NV0 0 0 VOPKFRoyal Vopak NV0 0 0 -
Is SBFFY or VOPKF More Risky?
SBM Offshore NV has a beta of 0.229, which suggesting that the stock is 77.14% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Vopak NV has a beta of 0.661, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.918%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SBFFY or VOPKF?
SBM Offshore NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. Royal Vopak NV offers a yield of 4.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. SBM Offshore NV pays 80.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Vopak NV pays out 51.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SBFFY or VOPKF?
SBM Offshore NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Royal Vopak NV quarterly revenues of --. SBM Offshore NV's net income of -- is lower than Royal Vopak NV's net income of --. Notably, SBM Offshore NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.10x while Royal Vopak NV's PE ratio is 9.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBM Offshore NV is 0.94x versus 3.61x for Royal Vopak NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SBFFYSBM Offshore NV0.94x 14.10x -- -- VOPKFRoyal Vopak NV3.61x 9.81x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Is JetBlue The Best Airline Stock?
Following a general trend of improvement among airline stocks, shares…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
73
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
FEIM alert for Dec 15
Frequency Electronics, Inc. [FEIM] is down 7.6% over the past day.
Buy
57
MOD alert for Dec 15
Modine Manufacturing Co. [MOD] is up 1.4% over the past day.
Sell
42
OKLO alert for Dec 15
Oklo, Inc. [OKLO] is down 4.82% over the past day.
