SBFFY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fugro NV has a net margin of -- compared to SBM Offshore NV's net margin of --. SBM Offshore NV's return on equity of 6.06% beat Fugro NV's return on equity of --.

SBM Offshore NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fugro NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SBM Offshore NV has higher upside potential than Fugro NV, analysts believe SBM Offshore NV is more attractive than Fugro NV.

SBM Offshore NV has a beta of 0.234, which suggesting that the stock is 76.611% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fugro NV has a beta of -0.058, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.845%.

SBM Offshore NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.39%. Fugro NV offers a yield of 7.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. SBM Offshore NV pays 80.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Fugro NV pays out 30.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SBM Offshore NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fugro NV quarterly revenues of --. SBM Offshore NV's net income of -- is lower than Fugro NV's net income of --. Notably, SBM Offshore NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.19x while Fugro NV's PE ratio is 7.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBM Offshore NV is 0.94x versus 0.56x for Fugro NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

National Energy Services Reunited Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to SBM Offshore NV's net margin of 6.01%. SBM Offshore NV's return on equity of 6.06% beat National Energy Services Reunited Corp.'s return on equity of 7.63%.

SBM Offshore NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand National Energy Services Reunited Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $19.80 which suggests that it could grow by 22.83%. Given that National Energy Services Reunited Corp. has higher upside potential than SBM Offshore NV, analysts believe National Energy Services Reunited Corp. is more attractive than SBM Offshore NV.

SBM Offshore NV has a beta of 0.234, which suggesting that the stock is 76.611% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Energy Services Reunited Corp. has a beta of 0.231, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.895%.

SBM Offshore NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.39%. National Energy Services Reunited Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SBM Offshore NV pays 80.75% of its earnings as a dividend. National Energy Services Reunited Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SBM Offshore NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SBM Offshore NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than National Energy Services Reunited Corp. quarterly revenues of $295.3M. SBM Offshore NV's net income of -- is lower than National Energy Services Reunited Corp.'s net income of $17.7M. Notably, SBM Offshore NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.19x while National Energy Services Reunited Corp.'s PE ratio is 22.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBM Offshore NV is 0.94x versus 1.24x for National Energy Services Reunited Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to SBM Offshore NV's net margin of 14.53%. SBM Offshore NV's return on equity of 6.06% beat Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.69%.

SBM Offshore NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $64.22 which suggests that it could grow by 21.4%. Given that Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has higher upside potential than SBM Offshore NV, analysts believe Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. is more attractive than SBM Offshore NV.

SBM Offshore NV has a beta of 0.234, which suggesting that the stock is 76.611% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. has a beta of 1.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.05%.

SBM Offshore NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.39%. Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. SBM Offshore NV pays 80.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. pays out 95.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SBM Offshore NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. quarterly revenues of $166.8M. SBM Offshore NV's net income of -- is lower than Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.'s net income of $24.2M. Notably, SBM Offshore NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.19x while Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBM Offshore NV is 0.94x versus 3.80x for Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Royal Vopak NV has a net margin of -- compared to SBM Offshore NV's net margin of --. SBM Offshore NV's return on equity of 6.06% beat Royal Vopak NV's return on equity of 15.35%.

SBM Offshore NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Royal Vopak NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SBM Offshore NV has higher upside potential than Royal Vopak NV, analysts believe SBM Offshore NV is more attractive than Royal Vopak NV.

SBM Offshore NV has a beta of 0.234, which suggesting that the stock is 76.611% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Vopak NV has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.631%.

SBM Offshore NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.39%. Royal Vopak NV offers a yield of 4.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. SBM Offshore NV pays 80.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Vopak NV pays out 51.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SBM Offshore NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Royal Vopak NV quarterly revenues of --. SBM Offshore NV's net income of -- is lower than Royal Vopak NV's net income of --. Notably, SBM Offshore NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.19x while Royal Vopak NV's PE ratio is 9.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBM Offshore NV is 0.94x versus 3.58x for Royal Vopak NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.