ULPRF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comture Corp. has a net margin of 15.34% compared to ULS Group, Inc.'s net margin of 7.86%. ULS Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.75% beat Comture Corp.'s return on equity of 17.19%.

ULS Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Comture Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ULS Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Comture Corp., analysts believe ULS Group, Inc. is more attractive than Comture Corp..

ULS Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.980, which suggesting that the stock is 97.956% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comture Corp. has a beta of -0.102, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.217%.

ULS Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.15%. Comture Corp. offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. ULS Group, Inc. pays 20.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Comture Corp. pays out 48.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ULS Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $28.7M, which are smaller than Comture Corp. quarterly revenues of $60.9M. ULS Group, Inc.'s net income of $4.4M is lower than Comture Corp.'s net income of $4.8M. Notably, ULS Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 145.85x while Comture Corp.'s PE ratio is 22.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ULS Group, Inc. is 17.07x versus 1.88x for Comture Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fujitsu Ltd. has a net margin of 15.34% compared to ULS Group, Inc.'s net margin of 9.32%. ULS Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.75% beat Fujitsu Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.32%.

ULS Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fujitsu Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ULS Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fujitsu Ltd., analysts believe ULS Group, Inc. is more attractive than Fujitsu Ltd..

ULS Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.980, which suggesting that the stock is 97.956% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fujitsu Ltd. has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.752%.

ULS Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.15%. Fujitsu Ltd. offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. ULS Group, Inc. pays 20.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Fujitsu Ltd. pays out 15.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ULS Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $28.7M, which are smaller than Fujitsu Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5.7B. ULS Group, Inc.'s net income of $4.4M is lower than Fujitsu Ltd.'s net income of $535.1M. Notably, ULS Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 145.85x while Fujitsu Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ULS Group, Inc. is 17.07x versus 1.62x for Fujitsu Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Research Institute Ltd. has a net margin of 15.34% compared to ULS Group, Inc.'s net margin of 14.51%. ULS Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.75% beat Nomura Research Institute Ltd.'s return on equity of 23.24%.

ULS Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Research Institute Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ULS Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nomura Research Institute Ltd., analysts believe ULS Group, Inc. is more attractive than Nomura Research Institute Ltd..

ULS Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.980, which suggesting that the stock is 97.956% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Research Institute Ltd. has a beta of 0.707, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.321%.

ULS Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.15%. Nomura Research Institute Ltd. offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. ULS Group, Inc. pays 20.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Research Institute Ltd. pays out 27.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ULS Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $28.7M, which are smaller than Nomura Research Institute Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. ULS Group, Inc.'s net income of $4.4M is lower than Nomura Research Institute Ltd.'s net income of $193.4M. Notably, ULS Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 145.85x while Nomura Research Institute Ltd.'s PE ratio is 21.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ULS Group, Inc. is 17.07x versus 2.86x for Nomura Research Institute Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

transcosmos, Inc. has a net margin of 15.34% compared to ULS Group, Inc.'s net margin of 4.08%. ULS Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.75% beat transcosmos, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.87%.

ULS Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand transcosmos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ULS Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than transcosmos, Inc., analysts believe ULS Group, Inc. is more attractive than transcosmos, Inc..

ULS Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.980, which suggesting that the stock is 97.956% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison transcosmos, Inc. has a beta of 0.045, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.454%.

ULS Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.15%. transcosmos, Inc. offers a yield of 3.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. ULS Group, Inc. pays 20.18% of its earnings as a dividend. transcosmos, Inc. pays out 35.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ULS Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $28.7M, which are smaller than transcosmos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $654.2M. ULS Group, Inc.'s net income of $4.4M is lower than transcosmos, Inc.'s net income of $26.7M. Notably, ULS Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 145.85x while transcosmos, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ULS Group, Inc. is 17.07x versus 0.31x for transcosmos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.