TRCLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comture Corp. has a net margin of 4.08% compared to transcosmos, Inc.'s net margin of 7.86%. transcosmos, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.87% beat Comture Corp.'s return on equity of 17.19%.

transcosmos, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Comture Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that transcosmos, Inc. has higher upside potential than Comture Corp., analysts believe transcosmos, Inc. is more attractive than Comture Corp..

transcosmos, Inc. has a beta of 0.074, which suggesting that the stock is 92.6% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comture Corp. has a beta of -0.097, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.651%.

transcosmos, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.47%. Comture Corp. offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. transcosmos, Inc. pays 35.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Comture Corp. pays out 48.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

transcosmos, Inc. quarterly revenues are $654.2M, which are larger than Comture Corp. quarterly revenues of $60.9M. transcosmos, Inc.'s net income of $26.7M is higher than Comture Corp.'s net income of $4.8M. Notably, transcosmos, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.62x while Comture Corp.'s PE ratio is 22.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for transcosmos, Inc. is 0.31x versus 1.88x for Comture Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fujitsu Ltd. has a net margin of 4.08% compared to transcosmos, Inc.'s net margin of 9.32%. transcosmos, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.87% beat Fujitsu Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.32%.

transcosmos, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fujitsu Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that transcosmos, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fujitsu Ltd., analysts believe transcosmos, Inc. is more attractive than Fujitsu Ltd..

transcosmos, Inc. has a beta of 0.074, which suggesting that the stock is 92.6% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fujitsu Ltd. has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.248%.

transcosmos, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.47%. Fujitsu Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. transcosmos, Inc. pays 35.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Fujitsu Ltd. pays out 15.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

transcosmos, Inc. quarterly revenues are $654.2M, which are smaller than Fujitsu Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5.7B. transcosmos, Inc.'s net income of $26.7M is lower than Fujitsu Ltd.'s net income of $535.1M. Notably, transcosmos, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.62x while Fujitsu Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for transcosmos, Inc. is 0.31x versus 1.70x for Fujitsu Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fronteo has a net margin of 4.08% compared to transcosmos, Inc.'s net margin of --. transcosmos, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.87% beat Fronteo's return on equity of --.

transcosmos, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fronteo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that transcosmos, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fronteo, analysts believe transcosmos, Inc. is more attractive than Fronteo.

transcosmos, Inc. has a beta of 0.074, which suggesting that the stock is 92.6% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fronteo has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

transcosmos, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.47%. Fronteo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. transcosmos, Inc. pays 35.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Fronteo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. transcosmos, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

transcosmos, Inc. quarterly revenues are $654.2M, which are larger than Fronteo quarterly revenues of --. transcosmos, Inc.'s net income of $26.7M is higher than Fronteo's net income of --. Notably, transcosmos, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.62x while Fronteo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for transcosmos, Inc. is 0.31x versus -- for Fronteo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Research Institute Ltd. has a net margin of 4.08% compared to transcosmos, Inc.'s net margin of 14.51%. transcosmos, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.87% beat Nomura Research Institute Ltd.'s return on equity of 23.24%.

transcosmos, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Research Institute Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that transcosmos, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nomura Research Institute Ltd., analysts believe transcosmos, Inc. is more attractive than Nomura Research Institute Ltd..

transcosmos, Inc. has a beta of 0.074, which suggesting that the stock is 92.6% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Research Institute Ltd. has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.182%.

transcosmos, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.47%. Nomura Research Institute Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. transcosmos, Inc. pays 35.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Research Institute Ltd. pays out 27.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

transcosmos, Inc. quarterly revenues are $654.2M, which are smaller than Nomura Research Institute Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. transcosmos, Inc.'s net income of $26.7M is lower than Nomura Research Institute Ltd.'s net income of $193.4M. Notably, transcosmos, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.62x while Nomura Research Institute Ltd.'s PE ratio is 20.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for transcosmos, Inc. is 0.31x versus 2.76x for Nomura Research Institute Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.