CEJOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fujitsu Ltd. has a net margin of 9.41% compared to Cresco Ltd.'s net margin of 9.32%. Cresco Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.31% beat Fujitsu Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.32%.

Cresco Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fujitsu Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cresco Ltd. has higher upside potential than Fujitsu Ltd., analysts believe Cresco Ltd. is more attractive than Fujitsu Ltd..

Cresco Ltd. has a beta of 0.407, which suggesting that the stock is 59.277% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fujitsu Ltd. has a beta of 0.842, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.827%.

Cresco Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Fujitsu Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Cresco Ltd. pays 39.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Fujitsu Ltd. pays out 15.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cresco Ltd. quarterly revenues are $105.5M, which are smaller than Fujitsu Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Cresco Ltd.'s net income of $9.9M is lower than Fujitsu Ltd.'s net income of $535.1M. Notably, Cresco Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.43x while Fujitsu Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cresco Ltd. is 0.92x versus 2.10x for Fujitsu Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fronteo has a net margin of 9.41% compared to Cresco Ltd.'s net margin of --. Cresco Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.31% beat Fronteo's return on equity of --.

Cresco Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fronteo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cresco Ltd. has higher upside potential than Fronteo, analysts believe Cresco Ltd. is more attractive than Fronteo.

Cresco Ltd. has a beta of 0.407, which suggesting that the stock is 59.277% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fronteo has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cresco Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Fronteo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cresco Ltd. pays 39.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Fronteo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cresco Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cresco Ltd. quarterly revenues are $105.5M, which are larger than Fronteo quarterly revenues of --. Cresco Ltd.'s net income of $9.9M is higher than Fronteo's net income of --. Notably, Cresco Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.43x while Fronteo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cresco Ltd. is 0.92x versus -- for Fronteo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Research Institute Ltd. has a net margin of 9.41% compared to Cresco Ltd.'s net margin of 14.51%. Cresco Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.31% beat Nomura Research Institute Ltd.'s return on equity of 23.24%.

Cresco Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Research Institute Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cresco Ltd. has higher upside potential than Nomura Research Institute Ltd., analysts believe Cresco Ltd. is more attractive than Nomura Research Institute Ltd..

Cresco Ltd. has a beta of 0.407, which suggesting that the stock is 59.277% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Research Institute Ltd. has a beta of 0.703, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.738%.

Cresco Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Nomura Research Institute Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Cresco Ltd. pays 39.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Research Institute Ltd. pays out 27.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cresco Ltd. quarterly revenues are $105.5M, which are smaller than Nomura Research Institute Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Cresco Ltd.'s net income of $9.9M is lower than Nomura Research Institute Ltd.'s net income of $193.4M. Notably, Cresco Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.43x while Nomura Research Institute Ltd.'s PE ratio is 22.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cresco Ltd. is 0.92x versus 3.00x for Nomura Research Institute Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

transcosmos, Inc. has a net margin of 9.41% compared to Cresco Ltd.'s net margin of 4.08%. Cresco Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.31% beat transcosmos, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.87%.

Cresco Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand transcosmos, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cresco Ltd. has higher upside potential than transcosmos, Inc., analysts believe Cresco Ltd. is more attractive than transcosmos, Inc..

Cresco Ltd. has a beta of 0.407, which suggesting that the stock is 59.277% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison transcosmos, Inc. has a beta of 0.073, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.676%.

Cresco Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. transcosmos, Inc. offers a yield of 3.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Cresco Ltd. pays 39.3% of its earnings as a dividend. transcosmos, Inc. pays out 35.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cresco Ltd. quarterly revenues are $105.5M, which are smaller than transcosmos, Inc. quarterly revenues of $654.2M. Cresco Ltd.'s net income of $9.9M is lower than transcosmos, Inc.'s net income of $26.7M. Notably, Cresco Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.43x while transcosmos, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cresco Ltd. is 0.92x versus 0.31x for transcosmos, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.