UBAAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a net margin of -858.29% compared to Urbana Corp.'s net margin of 32.75%. Urbana Corp.'s return on equity of 20.49% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.16%.

Urbana Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Urbana Corp. has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc., analysts believe Urbana Corp. is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc..

Urbana Corp. has a beta of 0.502, which suggesting that the stock is 49.808% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.839, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.053%.

Urbana Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share. Urbana Corp. pays 5.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays out 38.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Urbana Corp. quarterly revenues are -$3.4M, which are smaller than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.4M. Urbana Corp.'s net income of $28.9M is higher than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $13.6M. Notably, Urbana Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.92x while Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urbana Corp. is 22.86x versus 2.94x for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of -858.29% compared to Urbana Corp.'s net margin of 43.19%. Urbana Corp.'s return on equity of 20.49% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 7.18%.

Urbana Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $12.91 which suggests that it could grow by 12.92%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Urbana Corp., analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Urbana Corp..

Urbana Corp. has a beta of 0.502, which suggesting that the stock is 49.808% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.737, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.339%.

Urbana Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 13.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Urbana Corp. pays 5.29% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 119.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Urbana Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

Urbana Corp. quarterly revenues are -$3.4M, which are smaller than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $63.6M. Urbana Corp.'s net income of $28.9M is higher than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $27.5M. Notably, Urbana Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.92x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urbana Corp. is 22.86x versus 4.50x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a net margin of -858.29% compared to Urbana Corp.'s net margin of 29.17%. Urbana Corp.'s return on equity of 20.49% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s return on equity of 2.31%.

Urbana Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.71 which suggests that it could grow by 7.94%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has higher upside potential than Urbana Corp., analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. is more attractive than Urbana Corp..

Urbana Corp. has a beta of 0.502, which suggesting that the stock is 49.808% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.325%.

Urbana Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. offers a yield of 12.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Urbana Corp. pays 5.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. pays out 444.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Urbana Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s is not.

Urbana Corp. quarterly revenues are -$3.4M, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. quarterly revenues of $84.3M. Urbana Corp.'s net income of $28.9M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s net income of $24.6M. Notably, Urbana Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.92x while Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urbana Corp. is 22.86x versus 3.65x for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pineapple Financial has a net margin of -858.29% compared to Urbana Corp.'s net margin of -13.04%. Urbana Corp.'s return on equity of 20.49% beat Pineapple Financial's return on equity of -232.14%.

Urbana Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pineapple Financial has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5747.95%. Given that Pineapple Financial has higher upside potential than Urbana Corp., analysts believe Pineapple Financial is more attractive than Urbana Corp..

Urbana Corp. has a beta of 0.502, which suggesting that the stock is 49.808% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pineapple Financial has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Urbana Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Pineapple Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Urbana Corp. pays 5.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Pineapple Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urbana Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Urbana Corp. quarterly revenues are -$3.4M, which are smaller than Pineapple Financial quarterly revenues of $4.6M. Urbana Corp.'s net income of $28.9M is higher than Pineapple Financial's net income of -$595.5K. Notably, Urbana Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.92x while Pineapple Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urbana Corp. is 22.86x versus 0.03x for Pineapple Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.