Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Sell
28
TRSNF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.00
Seasonality move
:
0%
Day range:
$1.00 - $1.00
52-week range:
$1.00 - $1.24
Dividend yield:
22.21%
P/E ratio:
3.50x
P/S ratio:
1.08x
P/B ratio:
0.82x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-19.03%
Market cap:
$444.7M
Revenue:
$371.4M
EPS (TTM):
$0.29
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRSNF
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CEPU
Central Puerto SA
|
$187.1M | -- | 34.62% | -- | $18.67 |
|
EDCFF
Enel Generación Costanera SA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EDN
Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA
|
$470.3M | -$0.08 | -62.64% | -98.78% | $38.00 |
|
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
|
$8.1B | $1.72 | 22.72% | -10.27% | $202.62 |
|
PAM
Pampa Energía SA
|
$487.1M | $1.83 | 11.03% | -10.98% | $108.89 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRSNF
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica
|
$1.00 | -- | $444.7M | 3.50x | $0.22 | 22.21% | 1.08x |
|
CEPU
Central Puerto SA
|
$15.55 | $18.67 | $2.3B | 10.10x | $0.31 | 0% | 2.77x |
|
EDCFF
Enel Generación Costanera SA
|
$0.2000 | -- | $140.4M | 9.57x | $0.02 | 0% | 1.22x |
|
EDN
Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA
|
$28.39 | $38.00 | $1.2B | 6.81x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.53x |
|
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
|
$172.35 | $202.62 | $37.2B | 25.19x | $0.48 | 1.04% | 1.15x |
|
PAM
Pampa Energía SA
|
$81.42 | $108.89 | $4.4B | 12.77x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.27x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRSNF
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica
|
0.43% | 0.207 | 0.42% | 1.25x |
|
CEPU
Central Puerto SA
|
20.67% | 1.865 | 36.15% | 1.03x |
|
EDCFF
Enel Generación Costanera SA
|
22.03% | -2.975 | 24.55% | 1.59x |
|
EDN
Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA
|
28.23% | 1.287 | 84.85% | 0.85x |
|
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
|
86.01% | 2.653 | 38.1% | 0.54x |
|
PAM
Pampa Energía SA
|
34.35% | 0.636 | 55.14% | 1.78x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TRSNF
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica
|
$60.8M | $55.6M | 20.85% | 20.89% | 53.42% | $36.4M |
|
CEPU
Central Puerto SA
|
$98.1M | $88.4M | 10.6% | 12.84% | 36.78% | -$9.4M |
|
EDCFF
Enel Generación Costanera SA
|
$8.6M | $6.1M | 8.86% | 11.28% | 19.28% | -$3.8M |
|
EDN
Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA
|
$141.2M | $40.3M | 9.66% | 12.65% | 7.24% | -$74.4M |
|
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
|
$568M | -$44M | 10.58% | 59.88% | -0.58% | $231M |
|
PAM
Pampa Energía SA
|
$245.8M | $150.7M | 6.69% | 10.22% | 25.16% | $112.6M |
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TRSNF or CEPU?
Central Puerto SA has a net margin of 35.96% compared to Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's net margin of 43.79%. Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's return on equity of 20.89% beat Central Puerto SA's return on equity of 12.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRSNFCia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica58.39% $0.08 $547.8M CEPUCentral Puerto SA40.85% $0.70 $2.2B -
What do Analysts Say About TRSNF or CEPU?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Central Puerto SA has an analysts' consensus of $18.67 which suggests that it could grow by 20.04%. Given that Central Puerto SA has higher upside potential than Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica, analysts believe Central Puerto SA is more attractive than Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRSNFCia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica0 0 0 CEPUCentral Puerto SA2 1 0 -
Is TRSNF or CEPU More Risky?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Central Puerto SA has a beta of 1.104, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.386%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRSNF or CEPU?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 22.21%. Central Puerto SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica pays 191.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Central Puerto SA pays out 98.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Central Puerto SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRSNF or CEPU?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are smaller than Central Puerto SA quarterly revenues of $240.2M. Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's net income of $37.5M is lower than Central Puerto SA's net income of $105.2M. Notably, Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.50x while Central Puerto SA's PE ratio is 10.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica is 1.08x versus 2.77x for Central Puerto SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRSNFCia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica1.08x 3.50x $104.2M $37.5M CEPUCentral Puerto SA2.77x 10.10x $240.2M $105.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns TRSNF or EDCFF?
Enel Generación Costanera SA has a net margin of 35.96% compared to Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's net margin of 1.5%. Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's return on equity of 20.89% beat Enel Generación Costanera SA's return on equity of 11.28%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRSNFCia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica58.39% $0.08 $547.8M EDCFFEnel Generación Costanera SA27.25% $0.00 $156.5M -
What do Analysts Say About TRSNF or EDCFF?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Enel Generación Costanera SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica has higher upside potential than Enel Generación Costanera SA, analysts believe Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica is more attractive than Enel Generación Costanera SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRSNFCia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica0 0 0 EDCFFEnel Generación Costanera SA0 0 0 -
Is TRSNF or EDCFF More Risky?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enel Generación Costanera SA has a beta of -3.278, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 427.813%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRSNF or EDCFF?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 22.21%. Enel Generación Costanera SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica pays 191.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Enel Generación Costanera SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRSNF or EDCFF?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are larger than Enel Generación Costanera SA quarterly revenues of $31.6M. Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's net income of $37.5M is higher than Enel Generación Costanera SA's net income of $473.6K. Notably, Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.50x while Enel Generación Costanera SA's PE ratio is 9.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica is 1.08x versus 1.22x for Enel Generación Costanera SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRSNFCia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica1.08x 3.50x $104.2M $37.5M EDCFFEnel Generación Costanera SA1.22x 9.57x $31.6M $473.6K
-
Which has Higher Returns TRSNF or EDN?
Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA has a net margin of 35.96% compared to Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's net margin of 5.49%. Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's return on equity of 20.89% beat Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA's return on equity of 12.65%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRSNFCia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica58.39% $0.08 $547.8M EDNEmpresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA25.35% $0.70 $2B -
What do Analysts Say About TRSNF or EDN?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 33.85%. Given that Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA has higher upside potential than Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica, analysts believe Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA is more attractive than Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRSNFCia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica0 0 0 EDNEmpresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA1 1 0 -
Is TRSNF or EDN More Risky?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA has a beta of 1.749, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.903%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRSNF or EDN?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 22.21%. Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica pays 191.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRSNF or EDN?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are smaller than Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA quarterly revenues of $556.8M. Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's net income of $37.5M is higher than Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA's net income of $30.5M. Notably, Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.50x while Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA's PE ratio is 6.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica is 1.08x versus 0.53x for Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRSNFCia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica1.08x 3.50x $104.2M $37.5M EDNEmpresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA0.53x 6.81x $556.8M $30.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns TRSNF or NRG?
NRG Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 35.96% compared to Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's net margin of 2.01%. Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's return on equity of 20.89% beat NRG Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 59.88%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRSNFCia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica58.39% $0.08 $547.8M NRGNRG Energy, Inc.7.49% $0.69 $14.1B -
What do Analysts Say About TRSNF or NRG?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NRG Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $202.62 which suggests that it could grow by 17.56%. Given that NRG Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica, analysts believe NRG Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRSNFCia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica0 0 0 NRGNRG Energy, Inc.8 3 1 -
Is TRSNF or NRG More Risky?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NRG Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.272, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.222%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRSNF or NRG?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 22.21%. NRG Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica pays 191.07% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy, Inc. pays out 32.66% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRSNF or NRG?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are smaller than NRG Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's net income of $37.5M is lower than NRG Energy, Inc.'s net income of $152M. Notably, Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.50x while NRG Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica is 1.08x versus 1.15x for NRG Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRSNFCia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica1.08x 3.50x $104.2M $37.5M NRGNRG Energy, Inc.1.15x 25.19x $7.6B $152M
-
Which has Higher Returns TRSNF or PAM?
Pampa Energía SA has a net margin of 35.96% compared to Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's net margin of 5.06%. Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's return on equity of 20.89% beat Pampa Energía SA's return on equity of 10.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TRSNFCia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica58.39% $0.08 $547.8M PAMPampa Energía SA41.05% $0.56 $5.3B -
What do Analysts Say About TRSNF or PAM?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pampa Energía SA has an analysts' consensus of $108.89 which suggests that it could grow by 33.74%. Given that Pampa Energía SA has higher upside potential than Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica, analysts believe Pampa Energía SA is more attractive than Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TRSNFCia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica0 0 0 PAMPampa Energía SA5 3 0 -
Is TRSNF or PAM More Risky?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pampa Energía SA has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.177%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TRSNF or PAM?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 22.21%. Pampa Energía SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica pays 191.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Pampa Energía SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TRSNF or PAM?
Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are smaller than Pampa Energía SA quarterly revenues of $598.7M. Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's net income of $37.5M is higher than Pampa Energía SA's net income of $30.3M. Notably, Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.50x while Pampa Energía SA's PE ratio is 12.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica is 1.08x versus 2.27x for Pampa Energía SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TRSNFCia de Transporte de Energía Eléctrica1.08x 3.50x $104.2M $37.5M PAMPampa Energía SA2.27x 12.77x $598.7M $30.3M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Is Sandisk The Next Big Memory Stock?
Computer memory manufacturer Sandisk (NASDAQ:SNDK) has quietly been one of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Sell
43
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
44
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
77
CPS alert for Feb 14
Cooper-Standard Holdings, Inc. [CPS] is up 32.06% over the past day.
Buy
58
TPH alert for Feb 14
Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. [TPH] is up 26.83% over the past day.
Sell
20
IRON alert for Feb 14
Disc Medicine, Inc. [IRON] is down 21.88% over the past day.
