TPZEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EnLink Midstream LLC has a net margin of 25.42% compared to Topaz Energy's net margin of 0.88%. Topaz Energy's return on equity of 5.05% beat EnLink Midstream LLC's return on equity of 5.38%.

Topaz Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EnLink Midstream LLC has an analysts' consensus of $15.36 which suggests that it could grow by 7.29%. Given that EnLink Midstream LLC has higher upside potential than Topaz Energy, analysts believe EnLink Midstream LLC is more attractive than Topaz Energy.

Topaz Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EnLink Midstream LLC has a beta of 2.431, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 143.094%.

Topaz Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.79%. EnLink Midstream LLC offers a yield of 3.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Topaz Energy pays 370.07% of its earnings as a dividend. EnLink Midstream LLC pays out 114.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Topaz Energy quarterly revenues are $52M, which are smaller than EnLink Midstream LLC quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Topaz Energy's net income of $13.2M is lower than EnLink Midstream LLC's net income of $14M. Notably, Topaz Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.07x while EnLink Midstream LLC's PE ratio is 68.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Topaz Energy is 13.06x versus 0.98x for EnLink Midstream LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy Transfer LP has a net margin of 25.42% compared to Topaz Energy's net margin of 5.7%. Topaz Energy's return on equity of 5.05% beat Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 11.37%.

Topaz Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Energy Transfer LP has an analysts' consensus of $20.79 which suggests that it could grow by 9.09%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Topaz Energy, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Topaz Energy.

Topaz Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 1.702, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.246%.

Topaz Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.79%. Energy Transfer LP offers a yield of 6.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Topaz Energy pays 370.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP pays out 107.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Topaz Energy quarterly revenues are $52M, which are smaller than Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues of $20.8B. Topaz Energy's net income of $13.2M is lower than Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Topaz Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.07x while Energy Transfer LP's PE ratio is 14.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Topaz Energy is 13.06x versus 0.79x for Energy Transfer LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cheniere Energy has a net margin of 25.42% compared to Topaz Energy's net margin of 23.73%. Topaz Energy's return on equity of 5.05% beat Cheniere Energy's return on equity of 42.31%.

Topaz Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cheniere Energy has an analysts' consensus of $230.32 which suggests that it could grow by 3.05%. Given that Cheniere Energy has higher upside potential than Topaz Energy, analysts believe Cheniere Energy is more attractive than Topaz Energy.

Topaz Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheniere Energy has a beta of 0.986, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.439%.

Topaz Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.79%. Cheniere Energy offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Topaz Energy pays 370.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy pays out 3.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Topaz Energy's is not.

Topaz Energy quarterly revenues are $52M, which are smaller than Cheniere Energy quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Topaz Energy's net income of $13.2M is lower than Cheniere Energy's net income of $893M. Notably, Topaz Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.07x while Cheniere Energy's PE ratio is 14.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Topaz Energy is 13.06x versus 3.23x for Cheniere Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Williams Companies has a net margin of 25.42% compared to Topaz Energy's net margin of 26.61%. Topaz Energy's return on equity of 5.05% beat Williams Companies's return on equity of 19.5%.

Topaz Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Williams Companies has an analysts' consensus of $54.90 which suggests that it could grow by 0.06%. Given that Williams Companies has higher upside potential than Topaz Energy, analysts believe Williams Companies is more attractive than Topaz Energy.

Topaz Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams Companies has a beta of 1.058, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.828%.

Topaz Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.79%. Williams Companies offers a yield of 3.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Topaz Energy pays 370.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams Companies pays out 68.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Topaz Energy's is not.

Topaz Energy quarterly revenues are $52M, which are smaller than Williams Companies quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Topaz Energy's net income of $13.2M is lower than Williams Companies's net income of $706M. Notably, Topaz Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.07x while Williams Companies's PE ratio is 23.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Topaz Energy is 13.06x versus 6.44x for Williams Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.