NFE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Energy Transfer LP has a net margin of -89.61% compared to New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 4.89%. New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -77.36% beat Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 12.13%.

New Fortress Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling upside risk potential of 186.89%. On the other hand Energy Transfer LP has an analysts' consensus of $21.74 which suggests that it could grow by 14.53%. Given that New Fortress Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Energy Transfer LP, analysts believe New Fortress Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Energy Transfer LP.

New Fortress Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.042, which suggesting that the stock is 4.165% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 0.665, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.461%.

New Fortress Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Energy Transfer LP offers a yield of 6.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. New Fortress Energy, Inc. pays 26.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP pays out 108.73% of its earnings as a dividend. New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Energy Transfer LP's is not.

New Fortress Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $327.4M, which are smaller than Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues of $25.3B. New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$293.4M is lower than Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.2B. Notably, New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Energy Transfer LP's PE ratio is 15.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy, Inc. is 0.18x versus 0.77x for Energy Transfer LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cheniere Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -89.61% compared to New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 29.78%. New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -77.36% beat Cheniere Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 49.17%.

New Fortress Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling upside risk potential of 186.89%. On the other hand Cheniere Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $264.29 which suggests that it could grow by 16.74%. Given that New Fortress Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cheniere Energy, Inc., analysts believe New Fortress Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Cheniere Energy, Inc..

New Fortress Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.042, which suggesting that the stock is 4.165% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheniere Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.273, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.729%.

New Fortress Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cheniere Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. New Fortress Energy, Inc. pays 26.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy, Inc. pays out 12.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New Fortress Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $327.4M, which are smaller than Cheniere Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.3B. New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$293.4M is lower than Cheniere Energy, Inc.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Cheniere Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy, Inc. is 0.18x versus 2.69x for Cheniere Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vonage Holdings has a net margin of -89.61% compared to New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s net margin of --. New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -77.36% beat Vonage Holdings's return on equity of --.

New Fortress Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling upside risk potential of 186.89%. On the other hand Vonage Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that New Fortress Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Vonage Holdings, analysts believe New Fortress Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Vonage Holdings.

New Fortress Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.042, which suggesting that the stock is 4.165% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vonage Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

New Fortress Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vonage Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New Fortress Energy, Inc. pays 26.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Vonage Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New Fortress Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $327.4M, which are larger than Vonage Holdings quarterly revenues of --. New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$293.4M is higher than Vonage Holdings's net income of --. Notably, New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Vonage Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy, Inc. is 0.18x versus -- for Vonage Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Williams Cos., Inc. has a net margin of -89.61% compared to New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 24.17%. New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -77.36% beat The Williams Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 18.61%.

New Fortress Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling upside risk potential of 186.89%. On the other hand The Williams Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $75.51 which suggests that it could grow by 3.47%. Given that New Fortress Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Williams Cos., Inc., analysts believe New Fortress Energy, Inc. is more attractive than The Williams Cos., Inc..

New Fortress Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.042, which suggesting that the stock is 4.165% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Williams Cos., Inc. has a beta of 0.657, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.349%.

New Fortress Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Williams Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. New Fortress Energy, Inc. pays 26.95% of its earnings as a dividend. The Williams Cos., Inc. pays out 93.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New Fortress Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $327.4M, which are smaller than The Williams Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$293.4M is lower than The Williams Cos., Inc.'s net income of $773M. Notably, New Fortress Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while The Williams Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 47.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy, Inc. is 0.18x versus 7.51x for The Williams Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.