TNTFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ferrovial SE has a net margin of -3.18% compared to PostNL NV's net margin of --. PostNL NV's return on equity of -11.88% beat Ferrovial SE's return on equity of --.

PostNL NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ferrovial SE has an analysts' consensus of $69.88 which suggests that it could grow by 5.83%. Given that Ferrovial SE has higher upside potential than PostNL NV, analysts believe Ferrovial SE is more attractive than PostNL NV.

PostNL NV has a beta of 0.329, which suggesting that the stock is 67.067% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferrovial SE has a beta of -2.255, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 325.498%.

PostNL NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.72%. Ferrovial SE offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. PostNL NV pays 193.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrovial SE pays out 14.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrovial SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but PostNL NV's is not.

PostNL NV quarterly revenues are $883.4M, which are smaller than Ferrovial SE quarterly revenues of $2.6B. PostNL NV's net income of -$28M is higher than Ferrovial SE's net income of --. Notably, PostNL NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.36x while Ferrovial SE's PE ratio is 13.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PostNL NV is 0.16x versus 4.69x for Ferrovial SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICTS International NV has a net margin of -3.18% compared to PostNL NV's net margin of --. PostNL NV's return on equity of -11.88% beat ICTS International NV's return on equity of 5.54%.

PostNL NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ICTS International NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PostNL NV has higher upside potential than ICTS International NV, analysts believe PostNL NV is more attractive than ICTS International NV.

PostNL NV has a beta of 0.329, which suggesting that the stock is 67.067% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICTS International NV has a beta of 0.731, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.895%.

PostNL NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.72%. ICTS International NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PostNL NV pays 193.65% of its earnings as a dividend. ICTS International NV pays out 83.26% of its earnings as a dividend. ICTS International NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but PostNL NV's is not.

PostNL NV quarterly revenues are $883.4M, which are larger than ICTS International NV quarterly revenues of --. PostNL NV's net income of -$28M is higher than ICTS International NV's net income of --. Notably, PostNL NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.36x while ICTS International NV's PE ratio is 43.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PostNL NV is 0.16x versus 0.28x for ICTS International NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolters Kluwer NV has a net margin of -3.18% compared to PostNL NV's net margin of --. PostNL NV's return on equity of -11.88% beat Wolters Kluwer NV's return on equity of 86.21%.

PostNL NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wolters Kluwer NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PostNL NV has higher upside potential than Wolters Kluwer NV, analysts believe PostNL NV is more attractive than Wolters Kluwer NV.

PostNL NV has a beta of 0.329, which suggesting that the stock is 67.067% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolters Kluwer NV has a beta of 0.666, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.42%.

PostNL NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.72%. Wolters Kluwer NV offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. PostNL NV pays 193.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolters Kluwer NV pays out 45.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolters Kluwer NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but PostNL NV's is not.

PostNL NV quarterly revenues are $883.4M, which are larger than Wolters Kluwer NV quarterly revenues of --. PostNL NV's net income of -$28M is higher than Wolters Kluwer NV's net income of --. Notably, PostNL NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.36x while Wolters Kluwer NV's PE ratio is 20.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PostNL NV is 0.16x versus 3.73x for Wolters Kluwer NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.