TCLAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

E Automotive, Inc. has a net margin of 5.86% compared to Transcontinental, Inc.'s net margin of 7.61%. Transcontinental, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.97% beat E Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.96%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand E Automotive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transcontinental, Inc. has higher upside potential than E Automotive, Inc., analysts believe Transcontinental, Inc. is more attractive than E Automotive, Inc..

Transcontinental, Inc. has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.22% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison E Automotive, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. E Automotive, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transcontinental, Inc. pays 44.1% of its earnings as a dividend. E Automotive, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transcontinental, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcontinental, Inc. quarterly revenues are $527.8M, which are larger than E Automotive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $32.7M. Transcontinental, Inc.'s net income of $30.9M is higher than E Automotive, Inc.'s net income of $2.5M. Notably, Transcontinental, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.80x while E Automotive, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcontinental, Inc. is 0.73x versus 0.00x for E Automotive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd. has a net margin of 5.86% compared to Transcontinental, Inc.'s net margin of --. Transcontinental, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.97% beat The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transcontinental, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd., analysts believe Transcontinental, Inc. is more attractive than The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd..

Transcontinental, Inc. has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.22% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transcontinental, Inc. pays 44.1% of its earnings as a dividend. The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transcontinental, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcontinental, Inc. quarterly revenues are $527.8M, which are larger than The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Transcontinental, Inc.'s net income of $30.9M is higher than The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Transcontinental, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.80x while The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcontinental, Inc. is 0.73x versus 0.46x for The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Summit Networks, Inc. has a net margin of 5.86% compared to Transcontinental, Inc.'s net margin of -866.67%. Transcontinental, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.97% beat Summit Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of -40.17%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Summit Networks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transcontinental, Inc. has higher upside potential than Summit Networks, Inc., analysts believe Transcontinental, Inc. is more attractive than Summit Networks, Inc..

Transcontinental, Inc. has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.22% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Summit Networks, Inc. has a beta of 10.835, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 983.485%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. Summit Networks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transcontinental, Inc. pays 44.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Summit Networks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transcontinental, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcontinental, Inc. quarterly revenues are $527.8M, which are larger than Summit Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.3K. Transcontinental, Inc.'s net income of $30.9M is higher than Summit Networks, Inc.'s net income of -$80.6K. Notably, Transcontinental, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.80x while Summit Networks, Inc.'s PE ratio is 301.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcontinental, Inc. is 0.73x versus 963.60x for Summit Networks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 5.86% compared to Transcontinental, Inc.'s net margin of -27.48%. Transcontinental, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.97% beat Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -141.95%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.01 which suggests that it could grow by 18220.89%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Transcontinental, Inc., analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Transcontinental, Inc..

Transcontinental, Inc. has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.22% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.312, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.803%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transcontinental, Inc. pays 44.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transcontinental, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcontinental, Inc. quarterly revenues are $527.8M, which are larger than Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $15.7M. Transcontinental, Inc.'s net income of $30.9M is higher than Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Transcontinental, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.80x while Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcontinental, Inc. is 0.73x versus 0.08x for Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.