TCLAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Damon has a net margin of 5.67% compared to Transcontinental, Inc.'s net margin of -30909.14%. Transcontinental, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.28% beat Damon's return on equity of --.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Damon has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transcontinental, Inc. has higher upside potential than Damon, analysts believe Transcontinental, Inc. is more attractive than Damon.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a beta of 0.732, which suggesting that the stock is 26.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Damon has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. Damon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transcontinental, Inc. pays 63.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Damon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transcontinental, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcontinental, Inc. quarterly revenues are $498.1M, which are larger than Damon quarterly revenues of $81.4K. Transcontinental, Inc.'s net income of $28.2M is higher than Damon's net income of -$25.2M. Notably, Transcontinental, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.35x while Damon's PE ratio is 0.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcontinental, Inc. is 0.72x versus 518.40x for Damon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 5.67% compared to Transcontinental, Inc.'s net margin of -1757.18%. Transcontinental, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.28% beat Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -25.4%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 160.42%. Given that Hyliion Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Transcontinental, Inc., analysts believe Hyliion Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Transcontinental, Inc..

Transcontinental, Inc. has a beta of 0.732, which suggesting that the stock is 26.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.501, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.113%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. Hyliion Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transcontinental, Inc. pays 63.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transcontinental, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcontinental, Inc. quarterly revenues are $498.1M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $759K. Transcontinental, Inc.'s net income of $28.2M is higher than Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Transcontinental, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.35x while Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcontinental, Inc. is 0.72x versus 78.55x for Hyliion Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Summit Networks, Inc. has a net margin of 5.67% compared to Transcontinental, Inc.'s net margin of -866.67%. Transcontinental, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.28% beat Summit Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of -40.17%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Summit Networks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transcontinental, Inc. has higher upside potential than Summit Networks, Inc., analysts believe Transcontinental, Inc. is more attractive than Summit Networks, Inc..

Transcontinental, Inc. has a beta of 0.732, which suggesting that the stock is 26.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Summit Networks, Inc. has a beta of 10.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 920.639%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. Summit Networks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transcontinental, Inc. pays 63.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Summit Networks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transcontinental, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcontinental, Inc. quarterly revenues are $498.1M, which are larger than Summit Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.3K. Transcontinental, Inc.'s net income of $28.2M is higher than Summit Networks, Inc.'s net income of -$80.6K. Notably, Transcontinental, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.35x while Summit Networks, Inc.'s PE ratio is 301.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcontinental, Inc. is 0.72x versus 933.81x for Summit Networks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 5.67% compared to Transcontinental, Inc.'s net margin of -2502.32%. Transcontinental, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.28% beat Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -141.95%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.01 which suggests that it could grow by 1938.66%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Transcontinental, Inc., analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Transcontinental, Inc..

Transcontinental, Inc. has a beta of 0.732, which suggesting that the stock is 26.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.226, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.366%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.77%. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transcontinental, Inc. pays 63.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transcontinental, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcontinental, Inc. quarterly revenues are $498.1M, which are larger than Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $203K. Transcontinental, Inc.'s net income of $28.2M is higher than Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Transcontinental, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.35x while Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcontinental, Inc. is 0.72x versus 0.05x for Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.