TCLAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Damon has a net margin of 5.86% compared to Transcontinental, Inc.'s net margin of -30909.14%. Transcontinental, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.97% beat Damon's return on equity of --.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Damon has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transcontinental, Inc. has higher upside potential than Damon, analysts believe Transcontinental, Inc. is more attractive than Damon.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a beta of 0.732, which suggesting that the stock is 26.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Damon has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. Damon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transcontinental, Inc. pays 44.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Damon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transcontinental, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcontinental, Inc. quarterly revenues are $527.8M, which are larger than Damon quarterly revenues of $81.4K. Transcontinental, Inc.'s net income of $30.9M is higher than Damon's net income of -$25.2M. Notably, Transcontinental, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.48x while Damon's PE ratio is 0.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcontinental, Inc. is 0.71x versus 518.40x for Damon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd. has a net margin of 5.86% compared to Transcontinental, Inc.'s net margin of --. Transcontinental, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.97% beat The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transcontinental, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd., analysts believe Transcontinental, Inc. is more attractive than The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd..

Transcontinental, Inc. has a beta of 0.732, which suggesting that the stock is 26.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transcontinental, Inc. pays 44.11% of its earnings as a dividend. The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transcontinental, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcontinental, Inc. quarterly revenues are $527.8M, which are larger than The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Transcontinental, Inc.'s net income of $30.9M is higher than The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Transcontinental, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.48x while The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcontinental, Inc. is 0.71x versus 0.46x for The Limestone Boat Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Summit Networks, Inc. has a net margin of 5.86% compared to Transcontinental, Inc.'s net margin of -866.67%. Transcontinental, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.97% beat Summit Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of -40.17%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Summit Networks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transcontinental, Inc. has higher upside potential than Summit Networks, Inc., analysts believe Transcontinental, Inc. is more attractive than Summit Networks, Inc..

Transcontinental, Inc. has a beta of 0.732, which suggesting that the stock is 26.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Summit Networks, Inc. has a beta of 10.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 920.639%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. Summit Networks, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transcontinental, Inc. pays 44.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Summit Networks, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transcontinental, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcontinental, Inc. quarterly revenues are $527.8M, which are larger than Summit Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.3K. Transcontinental, Inc.'s net income of $30.9M is higher than Summit Networks, Inc.'s net income of -$80.6K. Notably, Transcontinental, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.48x while Summit Networks, Inc.'s PE ratio is 301.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcontinental, Inc. is 0.71x versus 1,051.14x for Summit Networks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 5.86% compared to Transcontinental, Inc.'s net margin of -2502.32%. Transcontinental, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.97% beat Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -141.95%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.01 which suggests that it could grow by 5863.76%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Transcontinental, Inc., analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Transcontinental, Inc..

Transcontinental, Inc. has a beta of 0.732, which suggesting that the stock is 26.826% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.226, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.366%.

Transcontinental, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.84%. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transcontinental, Inc. pays 44.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transcontinental, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transcontinental, Inc. quarterly revenues are $527.8M, which are larger than Vision Marine Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $203K. Transcontinental, Inc.'s net income of $30.9M is higher than Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Transcontinental, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.48x while Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transcontinental, Inc. is 0.71x versus 0.11x for Vision Marine Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.