SRUUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greenfire Resources Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's net margin of -6.41%. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's return on equity of -- beat Greenfire Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.13%.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Greenfire Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $5.71 which suggests that it could grow by 11.37%. Given that Greenfire Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sprott Physical Uranium Trust, analysts believe Greenfire Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Sprott Physical Uranium Trust.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a beta of 0.389, which suggesting that the stock is 61.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenfire Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greenfire Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greenfire Resources Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Greenfire Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of $99.2M. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's net income of -- is lower than Greenfire Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$6.4M. Notably, Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.31x while Greenfire Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust is 1,355.33x versus 0.92x for Greenfire Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's net margin of -13.37%. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's return on equity of -- beat Gran Tierra Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.72%.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.14 which suggests that it could grow by 37.83%. Given that Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sprott Physical Uranium Trust, analysts believe Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Sprott Physical Uranium Trust.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a beta of 0.389, which suggesting that the stock is 61.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.348, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.178%.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $149.3M. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's net income of -- is lower than Gran Tierra Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$20M. Notably, Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.31x while Gran Tierra Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust is 1,355.33x versus 0.27x for Gran Tierra Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nuclear Fuels, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's net margin of --. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's return on equity of -- beat Nuclear Fuels, Inc.'s return on equity of -71.56%.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nuclear Fuels, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has higher upside potential than Nuclear Fuels, Inc., analysts believe Sprott Physical Uranium Trust is more attractive than Nuclear Fuels, Inc..

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a beta of 0.389, which suggesting that the stock is 61.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuclear Fuels, Inc. has a beta of 2.740, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 174.036%.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nuclear Fuels, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuclear Fuels, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nuclear Fuels, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's net income of -- is lower than Nuclear Fuels, Inc.'s net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.31x while Nuclear Fuels, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust is 1,355.33x versus -- for Nuclear Fuels, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strata Power Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's net margin of -48.93%. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's return on equity of -- beat Strata Power Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Strata Power Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has higher upside potential than Strata Power Corp., analysts believe Sprott Physical Uranium Trust is more attractive than Strata Power Corp..

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a beta of 0.389, which suggesting that the stock is 61.114% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strata Power Corp. has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.987%.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strata Power Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strata Power Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Strata Power Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's net income of -- is lower than Strata Power Corp.'s net income of $6.3K. Notably, Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.31x while Strata Power Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust is 1,355.33x versus -- for Strata Power Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.