SRUUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greenfire Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's net margin of 30.43%. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's return on equity of -- beat Greenfire Resources's return on equity of 5.36%.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Greenfire Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has higher upside potential than Greenfire Resources, analysts believe Sprott Physical Uranium Trust is more attractive than Greenfire Resources.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greenfire Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greenfire Resources pays out -43.77% of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Greenfire Resources quarterly revenues of $141.9M. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's net income of -- is lower than Greenfire Resources's net income of $43.2M. Notably, Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.31x while Greenfire Resources's PE ratio is 13.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust is -- versus 0.88x for Greenfire Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gran Tierra Energy has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's net margin of 0.75%. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's return on equity of -- beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity of 11.15%.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gran Tierra Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.84%. Given that Gran Tierra Energy has higher upside potential than Sprott Physical Uranium Trust, analysts believe Gran Tierra Energy is more attractive than Sprott Physical Uranium Trust.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 1.533, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.336%.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gran Tierra Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gran Tierra Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gran Tierra Energy quarterly revenues of $151.4M. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's net income of -- is lower than Gran Tierra Energy's net income of $1.1M. Notably, Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.31x while Gran Tierra Energy's PE ratio is 5.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust is -- versus 0.38x for Gran Tierra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strata Power has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's net margin of -48.93%. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's return on equity of -- beat Strata Power's return on equity of --.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Strata Power has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has higher upside potential than Strata Power, analysts believe Sprott Physical Uranium Trust is more attractive than Strata Power.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strata Power has a beta of 2.958, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 195.824%.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strata Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strata Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Strata Power quarterly revenues of $37.9K. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's net income of -- is lower than Strata Power's net income of -$18.5K. Notably, Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.31x while Strata Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust is -- versus -- for Strata Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Canadian Overseas Petroleum has a net margin of -- compared to Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's net margin of --. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's return on equity of -- beat Canadian Overseas Petroleum's return on equity of --.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Canadian Overseas Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has higher upside potential than Canadian Overseas Petroleum, analysts believe Sprott Physical Uranium Trust is more attractive than Canadian Overseas Petroleum.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Overseas Petroleum has a beta of -0.299, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.861%.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canadian Overseas Petroleum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Overseas Petroleum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Canadian Overseas Petroleum quarterly revenues of --. Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's net income of -- is lower than Canadian Overseas Petroleum's net income of --. Notably, Sprott Physical Uranium Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.31x while Canadian Overseas Petroleum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust is -- versus 0.01x for Canadian Overseas Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.