GFR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FEC Resources has a net margin of 37.61% compared to Greenfire Resources's net margin of --. Greenfire Resources's return on equity of 16.57% beat FEC Resources's return on equity of --.

Greenfire Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FEC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Greenfire Resources has higher upside potential than FEC Resources, analysts believe Greenfire Resources is more attractive than FEC Resources.

Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FEC Resources has a beta of 1.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.235%.

Greenfire Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FEC Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenfire Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FEC Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenfire Resources quarterly revenues are $148.8M, which are larger than FEC Resources quarterly revenues of --. Greenfire Resources's net income of $56M is higher than FEC Resources's net income of -$57K. Notably, Greenfire Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.88x while FEC Resources's PE ratio is 0.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenfire Resources is 0.55x versus -- for FEC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gran Tierra Energy has a net margin of 37.61% compared to Greenfire Resources's net margin of -11.31%. Greenfire Resources's return on equity of 16.57% beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity of -3.92%.

Greenfire Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gran Tierra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $6.52 which suggests that it could grow by 59.07%. Given that Gran Tierra Energy has higher upside potential than Greenfire Resources, analysts believe Gran Tierra Energy is more attractive than Greenfire Resources.

Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 0.709, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.147%.

Greenfire Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gran Tierra Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenfire Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gran Tierra Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenfire Resources quarterly revenues are $148.8M, which are smaller than Gran Tierra Energy quarterly revenues of $170.5M. Greenfire Resources's net income of $56M is higher than Gran Tierra Energy's net income of -$19.3M. Notably, Greenfire Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.88x while Gran Tierra Energy's PE ratio is 44.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenfire Resources is 0.55x versus 0.21x for Gran Tierra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunshine Oilsands has a net margin of 37.61% compared to Greenfire Resources's net margin of -9.69%. Greenfire Resources's return on equity of 16.57% beat Sunshine Oilsands's return on equity of -43.12%.

Greenfire Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sunshine Oilsands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Greenfire Resources has higher upside potential than Sunshine Oilsands, analysts believe Greenfire Resources is more attractive than Sunshine Oilsands.

Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunshine Oilsands has a beta of -4,504.479, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 450547.875%.

Greenfire Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sunshine Oilsands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenfire Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sunshine Oilsands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenfire Resources quarterly revenues are $148.8M, which are larger than Sunshine Oilsands quarterly revenues of $3.8M. Greenfire Resources's net income of $56M is higher than Sunshine Oilsands's net income of -$370.1K. Notably, Greenfire Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.88x while Sunshine Oilsands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenfire Resources is 0.55x versus 0.47x for Sunshine Oilsands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zenith Energy has a net margin of 37.61% compared to Greenfire Resources's net margin of --. Greenfire Resources's return on equity of 16.57% beat Zenith Energy's return on equity of -44.35%.

Greenfire Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Zenith Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Greenfire Resources has higher upside potential than Zenith Energy, analysts believe Greenfire Resources is more attractive than Zenith Energy.

Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zenith Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenfire Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zenith Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenfire Resources pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zenith Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenfire Resources quarterly revenues are $148.8M, which are larger than Zenith Energy quarterly revenues of --. Greenfire Resources's net income of $56M is higher than Zenith Energy's net income of --. Notably, Greenfire Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.88x while Zenith Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenfire Resources is 0.55x versus 16.23x for Zenith Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.