SREDF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DNB Bank ASA has a net margin of 4.76% compared to Storebrand ASA's net margin of 20.88%. Storebrand ASA's return on equity of 15.09% beat DNB Bank ASA's return on equity of 16.31%.

Storebrand ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DNB Bank ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Storebrand ASA has higher upside potential than DNB Bank ASA, analysts believe Storebrand ASA is more attractive than DNB Bank ASA.

Storebrand ASA has a beta of 0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 91.516% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DNB Bank ASA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Storebrand ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. DNB Bank ASA offers a yield of 5.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.61 per share. Storebrand ASA pays 37.67% of its earnings as a dividend. DNB Bank ASA pays out 43.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Storebrand ASA quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than DNB Bank ASA quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Storebrand ASA's net income of $130.3M is lower than DNB Bank ASA's net income of $1B. Notably, Storebrand ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.57x while DNB Bank ASA's PE ratio is 10.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Storebrand ASA is 0.84x versus 2.07x for DNB Bank ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gjensidige Forsikring ASA has a net margin of 4.76% compared to Storebrand ASA's net margin of 12.52%. Storebrand ASA's return on equity of 15.09% beat Gjensidige Forsikring ASA's return on equity of 28.09%.

Storebrand ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gjensidige Forsikring ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Storebrand ASA has higher upside potential than Gjensidige Forsikring ASA, analysts believe Storebrand ASA is more attractive than Gjensidige Forsikring ASA.

Storebrand ASA has a beta of 0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 91.516% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gjensidige Forsikring ASA has a beta of 0.443, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.703%.

Storebrand ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Gjensidige Forsikring ASA offers a yield of 3.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share. Storebrand ASA pays 37.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Gjensidige Forsikring ASA pays out 67.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Storebrand ASA quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Gjensidige Forsikring ASA quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Storebrand ASA's net income of $130.3M is lower than Gjensidige Forsikring ASA's net income of $154.9M. Notably, Storebrand ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.57x while Gjensidige Forsikring ASA's PE ratio is 24.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Storebrand ASA is 0.84x versus 3.39x for Gjensidige Forsikring ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sparebanken Norge has a net margin of 4.76% compared to Storebrand ASA's net margin of 8.24%. Storebrand ASA's return on equity of 15.09% beat Sparebanken Norge's return on equity of 6.97%.

Storebrand ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sparebanken Norge has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Storebrand ASA has higher upside potential than Sparebanken Norge, analysts believe Storebrand ASA is more attractive than Sparebanken Norge.

Storebrand ASA has a beta of 0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 91.516% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sparebanken Norge has a beta of 0.124, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.633%.

Storebrand ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Sparebanken Norge offers a yield of 4.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Storebrand ASA pays 37.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Sparebanken Norge pays out 50.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Storebrand ASA quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Sparebanken Norge quarterly revenues of $854.2M. Storebrand ASA's net income of $130.3M is higher than Sparebanken Norge's net income of $70.4M. Notably, Storebrand ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.57x while Sparebanken Norge's PE ratio is 10.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Storebrand ASA is 0.84x versus 0.92x for Sparebanken Norge. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SpareBank 1 SMN has a net margin of 4.76% compared to Storebrand ASA's net margin of 18.84%. Storebrand ASA's return on equity of 15.09% beat SpareBank 1 SMN's return on equity of 10.18%.

Storebrand ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SpareBank 1 SMN has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Storebrand ASA has higher upside potential than SpareBank 1 SMN, analysts believe Storebrand ASA is more attractive than SpareBank 1 SMN.

Storebrand ASA has a beta of 0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 91.516% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SpareBank 1 SMN has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.727%.

Storebrand ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. SpareBank 1 SMN offers a yield of 9.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.18 per share. Storebrand ASA pays 37.67% of its earnings as a dividend. SpareBank 1 SMN pays out -57.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Storebrand ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Storebrand ASA quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than SpareBank 1 SMN quarterly revenues of $403.7M. Storebrand ASA's net income of $130.3M is higher than SpareBank 1 SMN's net income of $76.1M. Notably, Storebrand ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.57x while SpareBank 1 SMN's PE ratio is 6.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Storebrand ASA is 0.84x versus 1.14x for SpareBank 1 SMN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.