Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
62
SREDF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$16.07
Seasonality move
:
8.07%
Day range:
$16.07 - $16.07
52-week range:
$10.75 - $16.07
Dividend yield:
2.72%
P/E ratio:
15.17x
P/S ratio:
0.82x
P/B ratio:
2.15x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
72
1-year change:
43.61%
Market cap:
$6.8B
Revenue:
$4.4B
EPS (TTM):
$1.06
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SREDF
Storebrand ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ABGSF
ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DNBBY
DNB Bank ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GJNSY
Gjensidige Forsikring ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPIZF
Sparebanken Norge
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SRMGF
SpareBank 1 SMN
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SREDF
Storebrand ASA
|
$16.07 | -- | $6.8B | 15.17x | $0.44 | 2.72% | 0.82x |
|
ABGSF
ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA
|
$0.7706 | -- | $394.9M | 15.44x | $0.04 | 5.76% | 2.38x |
|
DNBBY
DNB Bank ASA
|
$26.64 | -- | $39B | 9.75x | $1.61 | 6.05% | 1.98x |
|
GJNSY
Gjensidige Forsikring ASA
|
$27.45 | -- | $13.7B | 22.35x | $0.95 | 3.47% | 3.11x |
|
SPIZF
Sparebanken Norge
|
$17.44 | -- | $3B | 10.88x | $0.81 | 4.65% | 0.92x |
|
SRMGF
SpareBank 1 SMN
|
$12.43 | -- | $1.8B | 6.86x | $1.18 | 9.53% | 1.14x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SREDF
Storebrand ASA
|
66.13% | 0.856 | 94.56% | 0.00x |
|
ABGSF
ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA
|
31.67% | -0.073 | 11.06% | 0.13x |
|
DNBBY
DNB Bank ASA
|
84.02% | -0.347 | 344.88% | 0.00x |
|
GJNSY
Gjensidige Forsikring ASA
|
25.06% | -0.671 | 5.68% | 0.00x |
|
SPIZF
Sparebanken Norge
|
86.16% | -0.052 | 957.29% | 0.00x |
|
SRMGF
SpareBank 1 SMN
|
70.59% | -0.532 | 365.84% | 0.00x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SREDF
Storebrand ASA
|
-- | $248M | 5.4% | 15.09% | 5.5% | -$843M |
|
ABGSF
ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA
|
-- | $13M | 24.88% | 32.24% | 23.41% | $3.4M |
|
DNBBY
DNB Bank ASA
|
-- | $1.3B | 2.54% | 16.31% | 79.35% | -$1.4B |
|
GJNSY
Gjensidige Forsikring ASA
|
-- | $300.2M | 21.16% | 28.09% | 16.53% | $68M |
|
SPIZF
Sparebanken Norge
|
-- | $216.2M | 0.92% | 6.97% | 86.97% | $356M |
|
SRMGF
SpareBank 1 SMN
|
-- | $108.5M | 2.93% | 10.18% | 79.74% | $222.1M |
Storebrand ASA vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SREDF or ABGSF?
ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA has a net margin of 4.76% compared to Storebrand ASA's net margin of 17.46%. Storebrand ASA's return on equity of 15.09% beat ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA's return on equity of 32.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SREDFStorebrand ASA-- $0.31 $9.4B ABGSFABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA-- $0.02 $125.6M -
What do Analysts Say About SREDF or ABGSF?
Storebrand ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Storebrand ASA has higher upside potential than ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA, analysts believe Storebrand ASA is more attractive than ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SREDFStorebrand ASA0 0 0 ABGSFABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA0 0 0 -
Is SREDF or ABGSF More Risky?
Storebrand ASA has a beta of 0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 91.516% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA has a beta of 0.991, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.93%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SREDF or ABGSF?
Storebrand ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA offers a yield of 5.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Storebrand ASA pays 37.67% of its earnings as a dividend. ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA pays out 83.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SREDF or ABGSF?
Storebrand ASA quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA quarterly revenues of $55.4M. Storebrand ASA's net income of $130.3M is higher than ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA's net income of $9.7M. Notably, Storebrand ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.17x while ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA's PE ratio is 15.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Storebrand ASA is 0.82x versus 2.38x for ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SREDFStorebrand ASA0.82x 15.17x $2.7B $130.3M ABGSFABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA2.38x 15.44x $55.4M $9.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns SREDF or DNBBY?
DNB Bank ASA has a net margin of 4.76% compared to Storebrand ASA's net margin of 20.88%. Storebrand ASA's return on equity of 15.09% beat DNB Bank ASA's return on equity of 16.31%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SREDFStorebrand ASA-- $0.31 $9.4B DNBBYDNB Bank ASA-- $0.69 $164.1B -
What do Analysts Say About SREDF or DNBBY?
Storebrand ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DNB Bank ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Storebrand ASA has higher upside potential than DNB Bank ASA, analysts believe Storebrand ASA is more attractive than DNB Bank ASA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SREDFStorebrand ASA0 0 0 DNBBYDNB Bank ASA0 0 0 -
Is SREDF or DNBBY More Risky?
Storebrand ASA has a beta of 0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 91.516% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DNB Bank ASA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SREDF or DNBBY?
Storebrand ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. DNB Bank ASA offers a yield of 6.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.61 per share. Storebrand ASA pays 37.67% of its earnings as a dividend. DNB Bank ASA pays out 43.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SREDF or DNBBY?
Storebrand ASA quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than DNB Bank ASA quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Storebrand ASA's net income of $130.3M is lower than DNB Bank ASA's net income of $1B. Notably, Storebrand ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.17x while DNB Bank ASA's PE ratio is 9.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Storebrand ASA is 0.82x versus 1.98x for DNB Bank ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SREDFStorebrand ASA0.82x 15.17x $2.7B $130.3M DNBBYDNB Bank ASA1.98x 9.75x $4.9B $1B
-
Which has Higher Returns SREDF or GJNSY?
Gjensidige Forsikring ASA has a net margin of 4.76% compared to Storebrand ASA's net margin of 12.52%. Storebrand ASA's return on equity of 15.09% beat Gjensidige Forsikring ASA's return on equity of 28.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SREDFStorebrand ASA-- $0.31 $9.4B GJNSYGjensidige Forsikring ASA-- $0.32 $3.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SREDF or GJNSY?
Storebrand ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gjensidige Forsikring ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Storebrand ASA has higher upside potential than Gjensidige Forsikring ASA, analysts believe Storebrand ASA is more attractive than Gjensidige Forsikring ASA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SREDFStorebrand ASA0 0 0 GJNSYGjensidige Forsikring ASA0 0 0 -
Is SREDF or GJNSY More Risky?
Storebrand ASA has a beta of 0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 91.516% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gjensidige Forsikring ASA has a beta of 0.443, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.703%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SREDF or GJNSY?
Storebrand ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. Gjensidige Forsikring ASA offers a yield of 3.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share. Storebrand ASA pays 37.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Gjensidige Forsikring ASA pays out 67.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SREDF or GJNSY?
Storebrand ASA quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Gjensidige Forsikring ASA quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Storebrand ASA's net income of $130.3M is lower than Gjensidige Forsikring ASA's net income of $154.9M. Notably, Storebrand ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.17x while Gjensidige Forsikring ASA's PE ratio is 22.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Storebrand ASA is 0.82x versus 3.11x for Gjensidige Forsikring ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SREDFStorebrand ASA0.82x 15.17x $2.7B $130.3M GJNSYGjensidige Forsikring ASA3.11x 22.35x $1.2B $154.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns SREDF or SPIZF?
Sparebanken Norge has a net margin of 4.76% compared to Storebrand ASA's net margin of 8.24%. Storebrand ASA's return on equity of 15.09% beat Sparebanken Norge's return on equity of 6.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SREDFStorebrand ASA-- $0.31 $9.4B SPIZFSparebanken Norge-- $0.40 $34.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SREDF or SPIZF?
Storebrand ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sparebanken Norge has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Storebrand ASA has higher upside potential than Sparebanken Norge, analysts believe Storebrand ASA is more attractive than Sparebanken Norge.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SREDFStorebrand ASA0 0 0 SPIZFSparebanken Norge0 0 0 -
Is SREDF or SPIZF More Risky?
Storebrand ASA has a beta of 0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 91.516% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sparebanken Norge has a beta of 0.124, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.633%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SREDF or SPIZF?
Storebrand ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. Sparebanken Norge offers a yield of 4.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Storebrand ASA pays 37.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Sparebanken Norge pays out 50.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SREDF or SPIZF?
Storebrand ASA quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Sparebanken Norge quarterly revenues of $854.2M. Storebrand ASA's net income of $130.3M is higher than Sparebanken Norge's net income of $70.4M. Notably, Storebrand ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.17x while Sparebanken Norge's PE ratio is 10.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Storebrand ASA is 0.82x versus 0.92x for Sparebanken Norge. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SREDFStorebrand ASA0.82x 15.17x $2.7B $130.3M SPIZFSparebanken Norge0.92x 10.88x $854.2M $70.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns SREDF or SRMGF?
SpareBank 1 SMN has a net margin of 4.76% compared to Storebrand ASA's net margin of 18.84%. Storebrand ASA's return on equity of 15.09% beat SpareBank 1 SMN's return on equity of 10.18%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SREDFStorebrand ASA-- $0.31 $9.4B SRMGFSpareBank 1 SMN-- $0.51 $9.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SREDF or SRMGF?
Storebrand ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SpareBank 1 SMN has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Storebrand ASA has higher upside potential than SpareBank 1 SMN, analysts believe Storebrand ASA is more attractive than SpareBank 1 SMN.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SREDFStorebrand ASA0 0 0 SRMGFSpareBank 1 SMN0 0 0 -
Is SREDF or SRMGF More Risky?
Storebrand ASA has a beta of 0.085, which suggesting that the stock is 91.516% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SpareBank 1 SMN has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.727%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SREDF or SRMGF?
Storebrand ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. SpareBank 1 SMN offers a yield of 9.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.18 per share. Storebrand ASA pays 37.67% of its earnings as a dividend. SpareBank 1 SMN pays out -57.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Storebrand ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SREDF or SRMGF?
Storebrand ASA quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than SpareBank 1 SMN quarterly revenues of $403.7M. Storebrand ASA's net income of $130.3M is higher than SpareBank 1 SMN's net income of $76.1M. Notably, Storebrand ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.17x while SpareBank 1 SMN's PE ratio is 6.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Storebrand ASA is 0.82x versus 1.14x for SpareBank 1 SMN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SREDFStorebrand ASA0.82x 15.17x $2.7B $130.3M SRMGFSpareBank 1 SMN1.14x 6.86x $403.7M $76.1M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
