Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
35
SRMGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$12.43
Seasonality move
:
-1.78%
Day range:
$12.43 - $12.43
52-week range:
$12.43 - $12.43
Dividend yield:
9.53%
P/E ratio:
6.86x
P/S ratio:
1.14x
P/B ratio:
0.63x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$1.8B
Revenue:
$1.5B
EPS (TTM):
$1.81
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SRMGF
SpareBank 1 SMN
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ABGSF
ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DNBBY
DNB Bank ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GJNSY
Gjensidige Forsikring ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPIZF
Sparebanken Norge
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SREDF
Storebrand ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SRMGF
SpareBank 1 SMN
|
$12.43 | -- | $1.8B | 6.86x | $1.18 | 9.53% | 1.14x |
|
ABGSF
ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA
|
$0.7706 | -- | $394.9M | 15.44x | $0.04 | 5.76% | 2.38x |
|
DNBBY
DNB Bank ASA
|
$27.88 | -- | $40.9B | 10.20x | $1.61 | 5.78% | 2.07x |
|
GJNSY
Gjensidige Forsikring ASA
|
$29.93 | -- | $15B | 24.37x | $0.95 | 3.18% | 3.39x |
|
SPIZF
Sparebanken Norge
|
$17.44 | -- | $3B | 10.88x | $0.81 | 4.65% | 0.92x |
|
SREDF
Storebrand ASA
|
$16.49 | -- | $7B | 15.57x | $0.44 | 2.65% | 0.84x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SRMGF
SpareBank 1 SMN
|
70.59% | -0.532 | 365.84% | 0.00x |
|
ABGSF
ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA
|
31.67% | -0.073 | 11.06% | 0.13x |
|
DNBBY
DNB Bank ASA
|
84.02% | -0.347 | 344.88% | 0.00x |
|
GJNSY
Gjensidige Forsikring ASA
|
25.06% | -0.671 | 5.68% | 0.00x |
|
SPIZF
Sparebanken Norge
|
86.16% | -0.052 | 957.29% | 0.00x |
|
SREDF
Storebrand ASA
|
66.13% | 0.856 | 94.56% | 0.00x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SRMGF
SpareBank 1 SMN
|
-- | $108.5M | 2.93% | 10.18% | 79.74% | $222.1M |
|
ABGSF
ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA
|
-- | $13M | 24.88% | 32.24% | 23.41% | $3.4M |
|
DNBBY
DNB Bank ASA
|
-- | $1.3B | 2.54% | 16.31% | 79.35% | -$1.4B |
|
GJNSY
Gjensidige Forsikring ASA
|
-- | $300.2M | 21.16% | 28.09% | 16.53% | $68M |
|
SPIZF
Sparebanken Norge
|
-- | $216.2M | 0.92% | 6.97% | 86.97% | $356M |
|
SREDF
Storebrand ASA
|
-- | $248M | 5.4% | 15.09% | 5.5% | -$843M |
SpareBank 1 SMN vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SRMGF or ABGSF?
ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA has a net margin of 18.84% compared to SpareBank 1 SMN's net margin of 17.46%. SpareBank 1 SMN's return on equity of 10.18% beat ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA's return on equity of 32.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SRMGFSpareBank 1 SMN-- $0.51 $9.7B ABGSFABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA-- $0.02 $125.6M -
What do Analysts Say About SRMGF or ABGSF?
SpareBank 1 SMN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SpareBank 1 SMN has higher upside potential than ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA, analysts believe SpareBank 1 SMN is more attractive than ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SRMGFSpareBank 1 SMN0 0 0 ABGSFABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA0 0 0 -
Is SRMGF or ABGSF More Risky?
SpareBank 1 SMN has a beta of 0.613, which suggesting that the stock is 38.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA has a beta of 0.991, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.93%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SRMGF or ABGSF?
SpareBank 1 SMN has a quarterly dividend of $1.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.53%. ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA offers a yield of 5.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. SpareBank 1 SMN pays -57.53% of its earnings as a dividend. ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA pays out 83.47% of its earnings as a dividend. ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SRMGF or ABGSF?
SpareBank 1 SMN quarterly revenues are $403.7M, which are larger than ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA quarterly revenues of $55.4M. SpareBank 1 SMN's net income of $76.1M is higher than ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA's net income of $9.7M. Notably, SpareBank 1 SMN's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.86x while ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA's PE ratio is 15.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SpareBank 1 SMN is 1.14x versus 2.38x for ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SRMGFSpareBank 1 SMN1.14x 6.86x $403.7M $76.1M ABGSFABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA2.38x 15.44x $55.4M $9.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns SRMGF or DNBBY?
DNB Bank ASA has a net margin of 18.84% compared to SpareBank 1 SMN's net margin of 20.88%. SpareBank 1 SMN's return on equity of 10.18% beat DNB Bank ASA's return on equity of 16.31%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SRMGFSpareBank 1 SMN-- $0.51 $9.7B DNBBYDNB Bank ASA-- $0.69 $164.1B -
What do Analysts Say About SRMGF or DNBBY?
SpareBank 1 SMN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DNB Bank ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SpareBank 1 SMN has higher upside potential than DNB Bank ASA, analysts believe SpareBank 1 SMN is more attractive than DNB Bank ASA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SRMGFSpareBank 1 SMN0 0 0 DNBBYDNB Bank ASA0 0 0 -
Is SRMGF or DNBBY More Risky?
SpareBank 1 SMN has a beta of 0.613, which suggesting that the stock is 38.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DNB Bank ASA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SRMGF or DNBBY?
SpareBank 1 SMN has a quarterly dividend of $1.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.53%. DNB Bank ASA offers a yield of 5.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.61 per share. SpareBank 1 SMN pays -57.53% of its earnings as a dividend. DNB Bank ASA pays out 43.23% of its earnings as a dividend. DNB Bank ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SRMGF or DNBBY?
SpareBank 1 SMN quarterly revenues are $403.7M, which are smaller than DNB Bank ASA quarterly revenues of $4.9B. SpareBank 1 SMN's net income of $76.1M is lower than DNB Bank ASA's net income of $1B. Notably, SpareBank 1 SMN's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.86x while DNB Bank ASA's PE ratio is 10.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SpareBank 1 SMN is 1.14x versus 2.07x for DNB Bank ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SRMGFSpareBank 1 SMN1.14x 6.86x $403.7M $76.1M DNBBYDNB Bank ASA2.07x 10.20x $4.9B $1B
-
Which has Higher Returns SRMGF or GJNSY?
Gjensidige Forsikring ASA has a net margin of 18.84% compared to SpareBank 1 SMN's net margin of 12.52%. SpareBank 1 SMN's return on equity of 10.18% beat Gjensidige Forsikring ASA's return on equity of 28.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SRMGFSpareBank 1 SMN-- $0.51 $9.7B GJNSYGjensidige Forsikring ASA-- $0.32 $3.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SRMGF or GJNSY?
SpareBank 1 SMN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gjensidige Forsikring ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SpareBank 1 SMN has higher upside potential than Gjensidige Forsikring ASA, analysts believe SpareBank 1 SMN is more attractive than Gjensidige Forsikring ASA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SRMGFSpareBank 1 SMN0 0 0 GJNSYGjensidige Forsikring ASA0 0 0 -
Is SRMGF or GJNSY More Risky?
SpareBank 1 SMN has a beta of 0.613, which suggesting that the stock is 38.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gjensidige Forsikring ASA has a beta of 0.443, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.703%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SRMGF or GJNSY?
SpareBank 1 SMN has a quarterly dividend of $1.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.53%. Gjensidige Forsikring ASA offers a yield of 3.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share. SpareBank 1 SMN pays -57.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Gjensidige Forsikring ASA pays out 67.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Gjensidige Forsikring ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SRMGF or GJNSY?
SpareBank 1 SMN quarterly revenues are $403.7M, which are smaller than Gjensidige Forsikring ASA quarterly revenues of $1.2B. SpareBank 1 SMN's net income of $76.1M is lower than Gjensidige Forsikring ASA's net income of $154.9M. Notably, SpareBank 1 SMN's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.86x while Gjensidige Forsikring ASA's PE ratio is 24.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SpareBank 1 SMN is 1.14x versus 3.39x for Gjensidige Forsikring ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SRMGFSpareBank 1 SMN1.14x 6.86x $403.7M $76.1M GJNSYGjensidige Forsikring ASA3.39x 24.37x $1.2B $154.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns SRMGF or SPIZF?
Sparebanken Norge has a net margin of 18.84% compared to SpareBank 1 SMN's net margin of 8.24%. SpareBank 1 SMN's return on equity of 10.18% beat Sparebanken Norge's return on equity of 6.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SRMGFSpareBank 1 SMN-- $0.51 $9.7B SPIZFSparebanken Norge-- $0.40 $34.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SRMGF or SPIZF?
SpareBank 1 SMN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sparebanken Norge has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SpareBank 1 SMN has higher upside potential than Sparebanken Norge, analysts believe SpareBank 1 SMN is more attractive than Sparebanken Norge.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SRMGFSpareBank 1 SMN0 0 0 SPIZFSparebanken Norge0 0 0 -
Is SRMGF or SPIZF More Risky?
SpareBank 1 SMN has a beta of 0.613, which suggesting that the stock is 38.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sparebanken Norge has a beta of 0.124, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.633%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SRMGF or SPIZF?
SpareBank 1 SMN has a quarterly dividend of $1.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.53%. Sparebanken Norge offers a yield of 4.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. SpareBank 1 SMN pays -57.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Sparebanken Norge pays out 50.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Sparebanken Norge's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SRMGF or SPIZF?
SpareBank 1 SMN quarterly revenues are $403.7M, which are smaller than Sparebanken Norge quarterly revenues of $854.2M. SpareBank 1 SMN's net income of $76.1M is higher than Sparebanken Norge's net income of $70.4M. Notably, SpareBank 1 SMN's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.86x while Sparebanken Norge's PE ratio is 10.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SpareBank 1 SMN is 1.14x versus 0.92x for Sparebanken Norge. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SRMGFSpareBank 1 SMN1.14x 6.86x $403.7M $76.1M SPIZFSparebanken Norge0.92x 10.88x $854.2M $70.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns SRMGF or SREDF?
Storebrand ASA has a net margin of 18.84% compared to SpareBank 1 SMN's net margin of 4.76%. SpareBank 1 SMN's return on equity of 10.18% beat Storebrand ASA's return on equity of 15.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SRMGFSpareBank 1 SMN-- $0.51 $9.7B SREDFStorebrand ASA-- $0.31 $9.4B -
What do Analysts Say About SRMGF or SREDF?
SpareBank 1 SMN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Storebrand ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SpareBank 1 SMN has higher upside potential than Storebrand ASA, analysts believe SpareBank 1 SMN is more attractive than Storebrand ASA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SRMGFSpareBank 1 SMN0 0 0 SREDFStorebrand ASA0 0 0 -
Is SRMGF or SREDF More Risky?
SpareBank 1 SMN has a beta of 0.613, which suggesting that the stock is 38.727% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Storebrand ASA has a beta of 0.085, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.516%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SRMGF or SREDF?
SpareBank 1 SMN has a quarterly dividend of $1.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.53%. Storebrand ASA offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. SpareBank 1 SMN pays -57.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Storebrand ASA pays out 37.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Storebrand ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SRMGF or SREDF?
SpareBank 1 SMN quarterly revenues are $403.7M, which are smaller than Storebrand ASA quarterly revenues of $2.7B. SpareBank 1 SMN's net income of $76.1M is lower than Storebrand ASA's net income of $130.3M. Notably, SpareBank 1 SMN's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.86x while Storebrand ASA's PE ratio is 15.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SpareBank 1 SMN is 1.14x versus 0.84x for Storebrand ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SRMGFSpareBank 1 SMN1.14x 6.86x $403.7M $76.1M SREDFStorebrand ASA0.84x 15.57x $2.7B $130.3M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 30
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 40.26% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 30
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 4.56% over the past day.
Buy
69
GDXU alert for Dec 30
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 3.19% over the past day.
