Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Buy
65
SPKOY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$19.46
Seasonality move
:
-4.08%
Day range:
$19.46 - $19.46
52-week range:
$16.92 - $19.46
Dividend yield:
6.59%
P/E ratio:
7.62x
P/S ratio:
14.95x
P/B ratio:
0.60x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
14.67%
Market cap:
$1.2B
Revenue:
$77.9M
EPS (TTM):
$2.55
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPKOY
Sinopec Kantons Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHNTF
China HK Power Smart Energy Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLSZF
China Oil And Gas Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CPIHF
Champion Technology Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KLYCY
Kunlun Energy
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UNEGF
United Energy Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPKOY
Sinopec Kantons Holdings
|
$19.46 | -- | $1.2B | 7.62x | $0.51 | 6.59% | 14.95x |
|
CHNTF
China HK Power Smart Energy Group
|
$0.02 | -- | $100.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.22x |
|
CLSZF
China Oil And Gas Group
|
$0.0175 | -- | $98.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.04x |
|
CPIHF
Champion Technology Holdings
|
$0.0160 | -- | $10.9M | 1.93x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.41x |
|
KLYCY
Kunlun Energy
|
$10.04 | -- | $8.7B | 11.74x | $0.23 | 6.14% | 0.34x |
|
UNEGF
United Energy Group
|
$0.04 | -- | $1B | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 0.52x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPKOY
Sinopec Kantons Holdings
|
-- | 0.311 | -- | 43.52x |
|
CHNTF
China HK Power Smart Energy Group
|
68.56% | 0.000 | 79.39% | 0.42x |
|
CLSZF
China Oil And Gas Group
|
67.18% | 11.992 | 184.94% | 0.92x |
|
CPIHF
Champion Technology Holdings
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 1.35x |
|
KLYCY
Kunlun Energy
|
27.41% | -1.443 | 29.82% | 1.38x |
|
UNEGF
United Energy Group
|
2.22% | 0.122 | 2.14% | 1.16x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SPKOY
Sinopec Kantons Holdings
|
-- | -- | 8.02% | 8.02% | -- | -- |
|
CHNTF
China HK Power Smart Energy Group
|
-- | -- | -17.34% | -91.27% | -- | -- |
|
CLSZF
China Oil And Gas Group
|
-- | -- | -1.89% | -3.72% | -- | -- |
|
CPIHF
Champion Technology Holdings
|
-- | -- | -9.3% | -10.91% | -- | -- |
|
KLYCY
Kunlun Energy
|
-- | -- | 5.28% | 6.8% | -- | -- |
|
UNEGF
United Energy Group
|
-- | -- | -14.41% | -16.46% | -- | -- |
Sinopec Kantons Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SPKOY or CHNTF?
China HK Power Smart Energy Group has a net margin of -- compared to Sinopec Kantons Holdings's net margin of --. Sinopec Kantons Holdings's return on equity of 8.02% beat China HK Power Smart Energy Group's return on equity of -91.27%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPKOYSinopec Kantons Holdings-- -- $2B CHNTFChina HK Power Smart Energy Group-- -- $123.4M -
What do Analysts Say About SPKOY or CHNTF?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China HK Power Smart Energy Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Kantons Holdings has higher upside potential than China HK Power Smart Energy Group, analysts believe Sinopec Kantons Holdings is more attractive than China HK Power Smart Energy Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPKOYSinopec Kantons Holdings0 0 0 CHNTFChina HK Power Smart Energy Group0 0 0 -
Is SPKOY or CHNTF More Risky?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings has a beta of 0.095, which suggesting that the stock is 90.539% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China HK Power Smart Energy Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPKOY or CHNTF?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.59%. China HK Power Smart Energy Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Kantons Holdings pays 42.12% of its earnings as a dividend. China HK Power Smart Energy Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Kantons Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPKOY or CHNTF?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China HK Power Smart Energy Group quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Kantons Holdings's net income of -- is lower than China HK Power Smart Energy Group's net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Kantons Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.62x while China HK Power Smart Energy Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Kantons Holdings is 14.95x versus 1.22x for China HK Power Smart Energy Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPKOYSinopec Kantons Holdings14.95x 7.62x -- -- CHNTFChina HK Power Smart Energy Group1.22x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SPKOY or CLSZF?
China Oil And Gas Group has a net margin of -- compared to Sinopec Kantons Holdings's net margin of --. Sinopec Kantons Holdings's return on equity of 8.02% beat China Oil And Gas Group's return on equity of -3.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPKOYSinopec Kantons Holdings-- -- $2B CLSZFChina Oil And Gas Group-- -- $2B -
What do Analysts Say About SPKOY or CLSZF?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Oil And Gas Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Kantons Holdings has higher upside potential than China Oil And Gas Group, analysts believe Sinopec Kantons Holdings is more attractive than China Oil And Gas Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPKOYSinopec Kantons Holdings0 0 0 CLSZFChina Oil And Gas Group0 0 0 -
Is SPKOY or CLSZF More Risky?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings has a beta of 0.095, which suggesting that the stock is 90.539% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Oil And Gas Group has a beta of 0.992, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.83%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPKOY or CLSZF?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.59%. China Oil And Gas Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Kantons Holdings pays 42.12% of its earnings as a dividend. China Oil And Gas Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Kantons Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPKOY or CLSZF?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Oil And Gas Group quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Kantons Holdings's net income of -- is lower than China Oil And Gas Group's net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Kantons Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.62x while China Oil And Gas Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Kantons Holdings is 14.95x versus 0.04x for China Oil And Gas Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPKOYSinopec Kantons Holdings14.95x 7.62x -- -- CLSZFChina Oil And Gas Group0.04x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SPKOY or CPIHF?
Champion Technology Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Sinopec Kantons Holdings's net margin of --. Sinopec Kantons Holdings's return on equity of 8.02% beat Champion Technology Holdings's return on equity of -10.91%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPKOYSinopec Kantons Holdings-- -- $2B CPIHFChampion Technology Holdings-- -- $12.4M -
What do Analysts Say About SPKOY or CPIHF?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Champion Technology Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Kantons Holdings has higher upside potential than Champion Technology Holdings, analysts believe Sinopec Kantons Holdings is more attractive than Champion Technology Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPKOYSinopec Kantons Holdings0 0 0 CPIHFChampion Technology Holdings0 0 0 -
Is SPKOY or CPIHF More Risky?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings has a beta of 0.095, which suggesting that the stock is 90.539% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Champion Technology Holdings has a beta of 6.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 515.379%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPKOY or CPIHF?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.59%. Champion Technology Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sinopec Kantons Holdings pays 42.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Champion Technology Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Kantons Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPKOY or CPIHF?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Champion Technology Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Kantons Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Champion Technology Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Kantons Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.62x while Champion Technology Holdings's PE ratio is 1.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Kantons Holdings is 14.95x versus 0.41x for Champion Technology Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPKOYSinopec Kantons Holdings14.95x 7.62x -- -- CPIHFChampion Technology Holdings0.41x 1.93x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SPKOY or KLYCY?
Kunlun Energy has a net margin of -- compared to Sinopec Kantons Holdings's net margin of --. Sinopec Kantons Holdings's return on equity of 8.02% beat Kunlun Energy's return on equity of 6.8%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPKOYSinopec Kantons Holdings-- -- $2B KLYCYKunlun Energy-- -- $15.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SPKOY or KLYCY?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kunlun Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Kantons Holdings has higher upside potential than Kunlun Energy, analysts believe Sinopec Kantons Holdings is more attractive than Kunlun Energy.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPKOYSinopec Kantons Holdings0 0 0 KLYCYKunlun Energy0 0 0 -
Is SPKOY or KLYCY More Risky?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings has a beta of 0.095, which suggesting that the stock is 90.539% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kunlun Energy has a beta of 0.628, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.186%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPKOY or KLYCY?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.59%. Kunlun Energy offers a yield of 6.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Sinopec Kantons Holdings pays 42.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Kunlun Energy pays out 38.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPKOY or KLYCY?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kunlun Energy quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Kantons Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Kunlun Energy's net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Kantons Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.62x while Kunlun Energy's PE ratio is 11.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Kantons Holdings is 14.95x versus 0.34x for Kunlun Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPKOYSinopec Kantons Holdings14.95x 7.62x -- -- KLYCYKunlun Energy0.34x 11.74x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SPKOY or UNEGF?
United Energy Group has a net margin of -- compared to Sinopec Kantons Holdings's net margin of --. Sinopec Kantons Holdings's return on equity of 8.02% beat United Energy Group's return on equity of -16.46%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SPKOYSinopec Kantons Holdings-- -- $2B UNEGFUnited Energy Group-- -- $1.8B -
What do Analysts Say About SPKOY or UNEGF?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand United Energy Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sinopec Kantons Holdings has higher upside potential than United Energy Group, analysts believe Sinopec Kantons Holdings is more attractive than United Energy Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SPKOYSinopec Kantons Holdings0 0 0 UNEGFUnited Energy Group0 0 0 -
Is SPKOY or UNEGF More Risky?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings has a beta of 0.095, which suggesting that the stock is 90.539% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Energy Group has a beta of 0.177, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.254%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SPKOY or UNEGF?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.59%. United Energy Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Sinopec Kantons Holdings pays 42.12% of its earnings as a dividend. United Energy Group pays out -61.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Kantons Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SPKOY or UNEGF?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than United Energy Group quarterly revenues of --. Sinopec Kantons Holdings's net income of -- is lower than United Energy Group's net income of --. Notably, Sinopec Kantons Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.62x while United Energy Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sinopec Kantons Holdings is 14.95x versus 0.52x for United Energy Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SPKOYSinopec Kantons Holdings14.95x 7.62x -- -- UNEGFUnited Energy Group0.52x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 0.21% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 4.69% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 8.42% over the past day.
