Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Buy
57
KLYCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.04
Seasonality move
:
34.36%
Day range:
$10.04 - $10.04
52-week range:
$8.10 - $11.87
Dividend yield:
6.14%
P/E ratio:
11.74x
P/S ratio:
0.34x
P/B ratio:
0.99x
Volume:
203
Avg. volume:
219
1-year change:
10.69%
Market cap:
$8.7B
Revenue:
$25.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.93
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KLYCY
Kunlun Energy
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHNTF
China HK Power Smart Energy Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLSZF
China Oil And Gas Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CPIHF
Champion Technology Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPKOY
Sinopec Kantons Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UNEGF
United Energy Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KLYCY
Kunlun Energy
|
$10.04 | -- | $8.7B | 11.74x | $0.23 | 6.14% | 0.34x |
|
CHNTF
China HK Power Smart Energy Group
|
$0.02 | -- | $100.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.22x |
|
CLSZF
China Oil And Gas Group
|
$0.0175 | -- | $98.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.04x |
|
CPIHF
Champion Technology Holdings
|
$0.0160 | -- | $10.9M | 1.93x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.41x |
|
SPKOY
Sinopec Kantons Holdings
|
$19.46 | -- | $1.2B | 7.62x | $0.51 | 6.59% | 14.95x |
|
UNEGF
United Energy Group
|
$0.04 | -- | $1B | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 0.52x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KLYCY
Kunlun Energy
|
27.41% | -1.443 | 29.82% | 1.38x |
|
CHNTF
China HK Power Smart Energy Group
|
68.56% | 0.000 | 79.39% | 0.42x |
|
CLSZF
China Oil And Gas Group
|
67.18% | 11.992 | 184.94% | 0.92x |
|
CPIHF
Champion Technology Holdings
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 1.35x |
|
SPKOY
Sinopec Kantons Holdings
|
-- | 0.311 | -- | 43.52x |
|
UNEGF
United Energy Group
|
2.22% | 0.122 | 2.14% | 1.16x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KLYCY
Kunlun Energy
|
-- | -- | 5.28% | 6.8% | -- | -- |
|
CHNTF
China HK Power Smart Energy Group
|
-- | -- | -17.34% | -91.27% | -- | -- |
|
CLSZF
China Oil And Gas Group
|
-- | -- | -1.89% | -3.72% | -- | -- |
|
CPIHF
Champion Technology Holdings
|
-- | -- | -9.3% | -10.91% | -- | -- |
|
SPKOY
Sinopec Kantons Holdings
|
-- | -- | 8.02% | 8.02% | -- | -- |
|
UNEGF
United Energy Group
|
-- | -- | -14.41% | -16.46% | -- | -- |
Kunlun Energy vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KLYCY or CHNTF?
China HK Power Smart Energy Group has a net margin of -- compared to Kunlun Energy's net margin of --. Kunlun Energy's return on equity of 6.8% beat China HK Power Smart Energy Group's return on equity of -91.27%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KLYCYKunlun Energy-- -- $15.2B CHNTFChina HK Power Smart Energy Group-- -- $123.4M -
What do Analysts Say About KLYCY or CHNTF?
Kunlun Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China HK Power Smart Energy Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kunlun Energy has higher upside potential than China HK Power Smart Energy Group, analysts believe Kunlun Energy is more attractive than China HK Power Smart Energy Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KLYCYKunlun Energy0 0 0 CHNTFChina HK Power Smart Energy Group0 0 0 -
Is KLYCY or CHNTF More Risky?
Kunlun Energy has a beta of 0.628, which suggesting that the stock is 37.186% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China HK Power Smart Energy Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KLYCY or CHNTF?
Kunlun Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.14%. China HK Power Smart Energy Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kunlun Energy pays 38.68% of its earnings as a dividend. China HK Power Smart Energy Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kunlun Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KLYCY or CHNTF?
Kunlun Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China HK Power Smart Energy Group quarterly revenues of --. Kunlun Energy's net income of -- is lower than China HK Power Smart Energy Group's net income of --. Notably, Kunlun Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.74x while China HK Power Smart Energy Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kunlun Energy is 0.34x versus 1.22x for China HK Power Smart Energy Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KLYCYKunlun Energy0.34x 11.74x -- -- CHNTFChina HK Power Smart Energy Group1.22x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KLYCY or CLSZF?
China Oil And Gas Group has a net margin of -- compared to Kunlun Energy's net margin of --. Kunlun Energy's return on equity of 6.8% beat China Oil And Gas Group's return on equity of -3.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KLYCYKunlun Energy-- -- $15.2B CLSZFChina Oil And Gas Group-- -- $2B -
What do Analysts Say About KLYCY or CLSZF?
Kunlun Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Oil And Gas Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kunlun Energy has higher upside potential than China Oil And Gas Group, analysts believe Kunlun Energy is more attractive than China Oil And Gas Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KLYCYKunlun Energy0 0 0 CLSZFChina Oil And Gas Group0 0 0 -
Is KLYCY or CLSZF More Risky?
Kunlun Energy has a beta of 0.628, which suggesting that the stock is 37.186% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Oil And Gas Group has a beta of 0.992, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.83%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KLYCY or CLSZF?
Kunlun Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.14%. China Oil And Gas Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kunlun Energy pays 38.68% of its earnings as a dividend. China Oil And Gas Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kunlun Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KLYCY or CLSZF?
Kunlun Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Oil And Gas Group quarterly revenues of --. Kunlun Energy's net income of -- is lower than China Oil And Gas Group's net income of --. Notably, Kunlun Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.74x while China Oil And Gas Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kunlun Energy is 0.34x versus 0.04x for China Oil And Gas Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KLYCYKunlun Energy0.34x 11.74x -- -- CLSZFChina Oil And Gas Group0.04x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KLYCY or CPIHF?
Champion Technology Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Kunlun Energy's net margin of --. Kunlun Energy's return on equity of 6.8% beat Champion Technology Holdings's return on equity of -10.91%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KLYCYKunlun Energy-- -- $15.2B CPIHFChampion Technology Holdings-- -- $12.4M -
What do Analysts Say About KLYCY or CPIHF?
Kunlun Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Champion Technology Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kunlun Energy has higher upside potential than Champion Technology Holdings, analysts believe Kunlun Energy is more attractive than Champion Technology Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KLYCYKunlun Energy0 0 0 CPIHFChampion Technology Holdings0 0 0 -
Is KLYCY or CPIHF More Risky?
Kunlun Energy has a beta of 0.628, which suggesting that the stock is 37.186% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Champion Technology Holdings has a beta of 6.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 515.379%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KLYCY or CPIHF?
Kunlun Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.14%. Champion Technology Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kunlun Energy pays 38.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Champion Technology Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kunlun Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KLYCY or CPIHF?
Kunlun Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Champion Technology Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Kunlun Energy's net income of -- is lower than Champion Technology Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Kunlun Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.74x while Champion Technology Holdings's PE ratio is 1.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kunlun Energy is 0.34x versus 0.41x for Champion Technology Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KLYCYKunlun Energy0.34x 11.74x -- -- CPIHFChampion Technology Holdings0.41x 1.93x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KLYCY or SPKOY?
Sinopec Kantons Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Kunlun Energy's net margin of --. Kunlun Energy's return on equity of 6.8% beat Sinopec Kantons Holdings's return on equity of 8.02%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KLYCYKunlun Energy-- -- $15.2B SPKOYSinopec Kantons Holdings-- -- $2B -
What do Analysts Say About KLYCY or SPKOY?
Kunlun Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sinopec Kantons Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kunlun Energy has higher upside potential than Sinopec Kantons Holdings, analysts believe Kunlun Energy is more attractive than Sinopec Kantons Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KLYCYKunlun Energy0 0 0 SPKOYSinopec Kantons Holdings0 0 0 -
Is KLYCY or SPKOY More Risky?
Kunlun Energy has a beta of 0.628, which suggesting that the stock is 37.186% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sinopec Kantons Holdings has a beta of 0.095, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.539%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KLYCY or SPKOY?
Kunlun Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.14%. Sinopec Kantons Holdings offers a yield of 6.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Kunlun Energy pays 38.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Sinopec Kantons Holdings pays out 42.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KLYCY or SPKOY?
Kunlun Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sinopec Kantons Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Kunlun Energy's net income of -- is lower than Sinopec Kantons Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Kunlun Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.74x while Sinopec Kantons Holdings's PE ratio is 7.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kunlun Energy is 0.34x versus 14.95x for Sinopec Kantons Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KLYCYKunlun Energy0.34x 11.74x -- -- SPKOYSinopec Kantons Holdings14.95x 7.62x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KLYCY or UNEGF?
United Energy Group has a net margin of -- compared to Kunlun Energy's net margin of --. Kunlun Energy's return on equity of 6.8% beat United Energy Group's return on equity of -16.46%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KLYCYKunlun Energy-- -- $15.2B UNEGFUnited Energy Group-- -- $1.8B -
What do Analysts Say About KLYCY or UNEGF?
Kunlun Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand United Energy Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kunlun Energy has higher upside potential than United Energy Group, analysts believe Kunlun Energy is more attractive than United Energy Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KLYCYKunlun Energy0 0 0 UNEGFUnited Energy Group0 0 0 -
Is KLYCY or UNEGF More Risky?
Kunlun Energy has a beta of 0.628, which suggesting that the stock is 37.186% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Energy Group has a beta of 0.177, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.254%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KLYCY or UNEGF?
Kunlun Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.14%. United Energy Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Kunlun Energy pays 38.68% of its earnings as a dividend. United Energy Group pays out -61.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Kunlun Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KLYCY or UNEGF?
Kunlun Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than United Energy Group quarterly revenues of --. Kunlun Energy's net income of -- is lower than United Energy Group's net income of --. Notably, Kunlun Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.74x while United Energy Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kunlun Energy is 0.34x versus 0.52x for United Energy Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KLYCYKunlun Energy0.34x 11.74x -- -- UNEGFUnited Energy Group0.52x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 0.14% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 5.03% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 6.74% over the past day.
