5 Investors to Follow Other Than Warren Buffett
There is no doubt that Warren Buffett is one of…
Buy
58
SORHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.26
Seasonality move
:
-11.05%
Day range:
$0.26 - $0.26
52-week range:
$0.26 - $0.26
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
1,864.39x
P/B ratio:
39.95x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$121.9M
Revenue:
$85.2K
EPS (TTM):
-$0.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CDBT
Cycclone
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$149.3M | $0.14 | 207.79% | 92.73% | $17.93 |
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
$0.26 | -- | $121.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1,864.39x |
|
CDBT
Cycclone
|
$0.0440 | -- | $1.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare
|
$25.76 | -- | $15.1B | 28.56x | $0.45 | 1.75% | 5.08x |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$6.89 | $17.93 | $1.5B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.30x |
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group
|
$125.54 | -- | $47.8B | 19.06x | $1.71 | 3.4% | 11.07x |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries
|
$0.0027 | -- | $1.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 10.42x |
|
CDBT
Cycclone
|
-- | 4.503 | -- | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare
|
45.73% | 0.566 | 13.16% | 1.44x |
|
IREN
IREN
|
19.83% | 7.851 | 15.18% | 0.86x |
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group
|
80.78% | 1.880 | 153.8% | 0.57x |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries
|
-- | -14.944 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
-- | -- | -49.77% | -50.35% | -- | -- |
|
CDBT
Cycclone
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare
|
-- | -- | 13.84% | 26.84% | -- | -- |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$110.6M | $16.3M | -5.24% | -5.61% | 23.93% | -- |
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group
|
-- | -- | 2.02% | 11.18% | -- | -- |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Strategic Elements vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SORHF or CDBT?
Cycclone has a net margin of -- compared to Strategic Elements's net margin of --. Strategic Elements's return on equity of -50.35% beat Cycclone's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SORHFStrategic Elements-- -- $3.1M CDBTCycclone-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SORHF or CDBT?
Strategic Elements has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cycclone has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Strategic Elements has higher upside potential than Cycclone, analysts believe Strategic Elements is more attractive than Cycclone.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SORHFStrategic Elements0 0 0 CDBTCycclone0 0 0 -
Is SORHF or CDBT More Risky?
Strategic Elements has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cycclone has a beta of 2.247, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.697%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SORHF or CDBT?
Strategic Elements has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cycclone offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategic Elements pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cycclone pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SORHF or CDBT?
Strategic Elements quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cycclone quarterly revenues of --. Strategic Elements's net income of -- is lower than Cycclone's net income of --. Notably, Strategic Elements's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cycclone's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Elements is 1,864.39x versus -- for Cycclone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SORHFStrategic Elements1,864.39x -- -- -- CDBTCycclone-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SORHF or CMSQY?
Computershare has a net margin of -- compared to Strategic Elements's net margin of --. Strategic Elements's return on equity of -50.35% beat Computershare's return on equity of 26.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SORHFStrategic Elements-- -- $3.1M CMSQYComputershare-- -- $3.5B -
What do Analysts Say About SORHF or CMSQY?
Strategic Elements has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Computershare has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Strategic Elements has higher upside potential than Computershare, analysts believe Strategic Elements is more attractive than Computershare.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SORHFStrategic Elements0 0 0 CMSQYComputershare0 0 0 -
Is SORHF or CMSQY More Risky?
Strategic Elements has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Computershare has a beta of 0.563, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.73%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SORHF or CMSQY?
Strategic Elements has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Computershare offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Strategic Elements pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare pays out 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SORHF or CMSQY?
Strategic Elements quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Computershare quarterly revenues of --. Strategic Elements's net income of -- is lower than Computershare's net income of --. Notably, Strategic Elements's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Computershare's PE ratio is 28.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Elements is 1,864.39x versus 5.08x for Computershare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SORHFStrategic Elements1,864.39x -- -- -- CMSQYComputershare5.08x 28.56x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SORHF or IREN?
IREN has a net margin of -- compared to Strategic Elements's net margin of 16.06%. Strategic Elements's return on equity of -50.35% beat IREN's return on equity of -5.61%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SORHFStrategic Elements-- -- $3.1M IRENIREN94.06% $0.09 $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About SORHF or IREN?
Strategic Elements has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IREN has an analysts' consensus of $17.93 which suggests that it could grow by 160.26%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Strategic Elements, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Strategic Elements.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SORHFStrategic Elements0 0 0 IRENIREN8 1 0 -
Is SORHF or IREN More Risky?
Strategic Elements has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IREN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SORHF or IREN?
Strategic Elements has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IREN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategic Elements pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IREN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SORHF or IREN?
Strategic Elements quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IREN quarterly revenues of $117.5M. Strategic Elements's net income of -- is lower than IREN's net income of $18.9M. Notably, Strategic Elements's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IREN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Elements is 1,864.39x versus 4.30x for IREN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SORHFStrategic Elements1,864.39x -- -- -- IRENIREN4.30x -- $117.5M $18.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns SORHF or MQBKY?
Macquarie Group has a net margin of -- compared to Strategic Elements's net margin of --. Strategic Elements's return on equity of -50.35% beat Macquarie Group's return on equity of 11.18%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SORHFStrategic Elements-- -- $3.1M MQBKYMacquarie Group-- -- $116.6B -
What do Analysts Say About SORHF or MQBKY?
Strategic Elements has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Macquarie Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Strategic Elements has higher upside potential than Macquarie Group, analysts believe Strategic Elements is more attractive than Macquarie Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SORHFStrategic Elements0 0 0 MQBKYMacquarie Group0 0 0 -
Is SORHF or MQBKY More Risky?
Strategic Elements has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Macquarie Group has a beta of 1.441, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.114%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SORHF or MQBKY?
Strategic Elements has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Macquarie Group offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Strategic Elements pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group pays out 75.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SORHF or MQBKY?
Strategic Elements quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Macquarie Group quarterly revenues of --. Strategic Elements's net income of -- is lower than Macquarie Group's net income of --. Notably, Strategic Elements's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Macquarie Group's PE ratio is 19.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Elements is 1,864.39x versus 11.07x for Macquarie Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SORHFStrategic Elements1,864.39x -- -- -- MQBKYMacquarie Group11.07x 19.06x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SORHF or SIPN?
SIPP International Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Strategic Elements's net margin of --. Strategic Elements's return on equity of -50.35% beat SIPP International Industries's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SORHFStrategic Elements-- -- $3.1M SIPNSIPP International Industries-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SORHF or SIPN?
Strategic Elements has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SIPP International Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Strategic Elements has higher upside potential than SIPP International Industries, analysts believe Strategic Elements is more attractive than SIPP International Industries.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SORHFStrategic Elements0 0 0 SIPNSIPP International Industries0 0 0 -
Is SORHF or SIPN More Risky?
Strategic Elements has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIPP International Industries has a beta of 0.191, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.853%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SORHF or SIPN?
Strategic Elements has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIPP International Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategic Elements pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIPP International Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SORHF or SIPN?
Strategic Elements quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SIPP International Industries quarterly revenues of --. Strategic Elements's net income of -- is lower than SIPP International Industries's net income of --. Notably, Strategic Elements's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SIPP International Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Elements is 1,864.39x versus -- for SIPP International Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SORHFStrategic Elements1,864.39x -- -- -- SIPNSIPP International Industries-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is BYD a Threat To Tesla Shareholders?
BYD (OTC:BYDDY) has rocketed to the top of China’s booming…
CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?
Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) are two of the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Buy
63
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
99
DAVE alert for May 9
Dave [DAVE] is up 41.65% over the past day.
Buy
62
RGC alert for May 9
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 10.54% over the past day.
Buy
85
TPB alert for May 9
Turning Point Brands [TPB] is down 6.67% over the past day.
