SNBH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -1.07% compared to Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -6.77%. Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -151.59%.

Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 69.49%. Given that Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc..

Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.096, which suggesting that the stock is 109.641% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $373.8K, which are smaller than Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $43.7M. Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$4K is higher than Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$3M. Notably, Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. is 3.63x versus 0.25x for Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Beauty Health Co. has a net margin of -1.07% compared to Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -15.61%. Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat The Beauty Health Co.'s return on equity of -19.76%.

Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Beauty Health Co. has an analysts' consensus of $1.93 which suggests that it could grow by 34.26%. Given that The Beauty Health Co. has higher upside potential than Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc., analysts believe The Beauty Health Co. is more attractive than Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc..

Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.096, which suggesting that the stock is 109.641% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Beauty Health Co. has a beta of 1.162, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.231%.

Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Beauty Health Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Beauty Health Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $373.8K, which are smaller than The Beauty Health Co. quarterly revenues of $70.7M. Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$4K is higher than The Beauty Health Co.'s net income of -$11M. Notably, Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Beauty Health Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. is 3.63x versus 0.62x for The Beauty Health Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solesence, Inc. has a net margin of -1.07% compared to Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -7.67%. Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Solesence, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.62%.

Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solesence, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Solesence, Inc., analysts believe Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Solesence, Inc..

Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.096, which suggesting that the stock is 109.641% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solesence, Inc. has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.259%.

Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solesence, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solesence, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $373.8K, which are smaller than Solesence, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.6M. Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$4K is higher than Solesence, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solesence, Inc.'s PE ratio is 107.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. is 3.63x versus 1.72x for Solesence, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Waldencast Plc has a net margin of -1.07% compared to Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Waldencast Plc's return on equity of -5.64%.

Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Waldencast Plc has an analysts' consensus of $3.16 which suggests that it could grow by 110.67%. Given that Waldencast Plc has higher upside potential than Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Waldencast Plc is more attractive than Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc..

Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.096, which suggesting that the stock is 109.641% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Waldencast Plc has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Waldencast Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waldencast Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $373.8K, which are larger than Waldencast Plc quarterly revenues of --. Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$4K is higher than Waldencast Plc's net income of --. Notably, Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Waldencast Plc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. is 3.63x versus 0.61x for Waldencast Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.