Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
43
SKIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.10
Seasonality move
:
-5.01%
Day range:
$1.05 - $1.13
52-week range:
$0.78 - $2.69
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.46x
P/B ratio:
2.10x
Volume:
1.2M
Avg. volume:
671.3K
1-year change:
-15.29%
Market cap:
$137.7M
Revenue:
$334.3M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.22
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SKIN
The Beauty Health Co.
|
$78.1M | -$0.05 | -2.02% | -66.08% | $2.03 |
|
EWCZ
European Wax Center, Inc.
|
$46.2M | $0.06 | 1.82% | 234.75% | $7.64 |
|
FKST
Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLSN
Solesence, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNBH
Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WALD
Waldencast Plc
|
$72.8M | -$0.11 | 18.69% | -- | $3.08 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SKIN
The Beauty Health Co.
|
$1.08 | $2.03 | $137.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.46x |
|
EWCZ
European Wax Center, Inc.
|
$5.74 | $7.64 | $252.7M | 22.01x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.18x |
|
FKST
Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.
|
$5.04 | -- | $17.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SLSN
Solesence, Inc.
|
$1.18 | -- | $83.2M | 84.29x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.36x |
|
SNBH
Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.
|
$0.02 | -- | $74.3K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.63x |
|
WALD
Waldencast Plc
|
$1.58 | $3.08 | $201.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.65x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SKIN
The Beauty Health Co.
|
85.23% | 5.040 | 149.6% | 4.02x |
|
EWCZ
European Wax Center, Inc.
|
83.03% | 5.122 | 191.37% | 2.95x |
|
FKST
Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.
|
-- | -26.905 | -- | -- |
|
SLSN
Solesence, Inc.
|
59.38% | 2.823 | 11.09% | 0.66x |
|
SNBH
Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.
|
-108.09% | -2.273 | 9.33% | 0.10x |
|
WALD
Waldencast Plc
|
20.1% | 0.564 | 29.71% | 0.53x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SKIN
The Beauty Health Co.
|
$45.6M | -$6.2M | -2.13% | -19.76% | -8.84% | $8.6M |
|
EWCZ
European Wax Center, Inc.
|
$34.7M | $14.3M | 3.41% | 16.45% | 26.36% | $16.5M |
|
FKST
Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLSN
Solesence, Inc.
|
$3.4M | -$781K | 2.86% | 6.62% | -5.35% | -$2.9M |
|
SNBH
Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.
|
$236.3K | $31.4K | -- | -- | 8.4% | -$28.6K |
|
WALD
Waldencast Plc
|
-- | -- | -4.62% | -5.64% | -- | -- |
The Beauty Health Co. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SKIN or EWCZ?
European Wax Center, Inc. has a net margin of -15.61% compared to The Beauty Health Co.'s net margin of 9.91%. The Beauty Health Co.'s return on equity of -19.76% beat European Wax Center, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.45%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SKINThe Beauty Health Co.64.59% -$0.09 $444.6M EWCZEuropean Wax Center, Inc.63.98% $0.09 $487M -
What do Analysts Say About SKIN or EWCZ?
The Beauty Health Co. has a consensus price target of $2.03, signalling upside risk potential of 87.96%. On the other hand European Wax Center, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.64 which suggests that it could grow by 33.1%. Given that The Beauty Health Co. has higher upside potential than European Wax Center, Inc., analysts believe The Beauty Health Co. is more attractive than European Wax Center, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SKINThe Beauty Health Co.1 5 0 EWCZEuropean Wax Center, Inc.1 4 0 -
Is SKIN or EWCZ More Risky?
The Beauty Health Co. has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.782% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison European Wax Center, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SKIN or EWCZ?
The Beauty Health Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. European Wax Center, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Beauty Health Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. European Wax Center, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SKIN or EWCZ?
The Beauty Health Co. quarterly revenues are $70.7M, which are larger than European Wax Center, Inc. quarterly revenues of $54.2M. The Beauty Health Co.'s net income of -$11M is lower than European Wax Center, Inc.'s net income of $5.4M. Notably, The Beauty Health Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while European Wax Center, Inc.'s PE ratio is 22.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Beauty Health Co. is 0.46x versus 1.18x for European Wax Center, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SKINThe Beauty Health Co.0.46x -- $70.7M -$11M EWCZEuropean Wax Center, Inc.1.18x 22.01x $54.2M $5.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns SKIN or FKST?
Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc. has a net margin of -15.61% compared to The Beauty Health Co.'s net margin of --. The Beauty Health Co.'s return on equity of -19.76% beat Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SKINThe Beauty Health Co.64.59% -$0.09 $444.6M FKSTFlowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SKIN or FKST?
The Beauty Health Co. has a consensus price target of $2.03, signalling upside risk potential of 87.96%. On the other hand Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Beauty Health Co. has higher upside potential than Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc., analysts believe The Beauty Health Co. is more attractive than Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SKINThe Beauty Health Co.1 5 0 FKSTFlowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SKIN or FKST More Risky?
The Beauty Health Co. has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.782% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc. has a beta of -2.422, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 342.204%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SKIN or FKST?
The Beauty Health Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Beauty Health Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SKIN or FKST?
The Beauty Health Co. quarterly revenues are $70.7M, which are larger than Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. The Beauty Health Co.'s net income of -$11M is higher than Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, The Beauty Health Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Beauty Health Co. is 0.46x versus -- for Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SKINThe Beauty Health Co.0.46x -- $70.7M -$11M FKSTFlowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SKIN or SLSN?
Solesence, Inc. has a net margin of -15.61% compared to The Beauty Health Co.'s net margin of -7.67%. The Beauty Health Co.'s return on equity of -19.76% beat Solesence, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SKINThe Beauty Health Co.64.59% -$0.09 $444.6M SLSNSolesence, Inc.23.09% -$0.02 $42.4M -
What do Analysts Say About SKIN or SLSN?
The Beauty Health Co. has a consensus price target of $2.03, signalling upside risk potential of 87.96%. On the other hand Solesence, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Beauty Health Co. has higher upside potential than Solesence, Inc., analysts believe The Beauty Health Co. is more attractive than Solesence, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SKINThe Beauty Health Co.1 5 0 SLSNSolesence, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SKIN or SLSN More Risky?
The Beauty Health Co. has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.782% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solesence, Inc. has a beta of 1.099, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.887%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SKIN or SLSN?
The Beauty Health Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solesence, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Beauty Health Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solesence, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SKIN or SLSN?
The Beauty Health Co. quarterly revenues are $70.7M, which are larger than Solesence, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.6M. The Beauty Health Co.'s net income of -$11M is lower than Solesence, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, The Beauty Health Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solesence, Inc.'s PE ratio is 84.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Beauty Health Co. is 0.46x versus 1.36x for Solesence, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SKINThe Beauty Health Co.0.46x -- $70.7M -$11M SLSNSolesence, Inc.1.36x 84.29x $14.6M -$1.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns SKIN or SNBH?
Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -15.61% compared to The Beauty Health Co.'s net margin of -1.07%. The Beauty Health Co.'s return on equity of -19.76% beat Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SKINThe Beauty Health Co.64.59% -$0.09 $444.6M SNBHSentient Brands Holdings, Inc.63.22% -$0.00 -$713.7K -
What do Analysts Say About SKIN or SNBH?
The Beauty Health Co. has a consensus price target of $2.03, signalling upside risk potential of 87.96%. On the other hand Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Beauty Health Co. has higher upside potential than Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc., analysts believe The Beauty Health Co. is more attractive than Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SKINThe Beauty Health Co.1 5 0 SNBHSentient Brands Holdings, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SKIN or SNBH More Risky?
The Beauty Health Co. has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.782% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.096, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.641%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SKIN or SNBH?
The Beauty Health Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Beauty Health Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SKIN or SNBH?
The Beauty Health Co. quarterly revenues are $70.7M, which are larger than Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $373.8K. The Beauty Health Co.'s net income of -$11M is lower than Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$4K. Notably, The Beauty Health Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Beauty Health Co. is 0.46x versus 3.63x for Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SKINThe Beauty Health Co.0.46x -- $70.7M -$11M SNBHSentient Brands Holdings, Inc.3.63x -- $373.8K -$4K
-
Which has Higher Returns SKIN or WALD?
Waldencast Plc has a net margin of -15.61% compared to The Beauty Health Co.'s net margin of --. The Beauty Health Co.'s return on equity of -19.76% beat Waldencast Plc's return on equity of -5.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SKINThe Beauty Health Co.64.59% -$0.09 $444.6M WALDWaldencast Plc-- -- $896.6M -
What do Analysts Say About SKIN or WALD?
The Beauty Health Co. has a consensus price target of $2.03, signalling upside risk potential of 87.96%. On the other hand Waldencast Plc has an analysts' consensus of $3.08 which suggests that it could grow by 94.62%. Given that Waldencast Plc has higher upside potential than The Beauty Health Co., analysts believe Waldencast Plc is more attractive than The Beauty Health Co..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SKINThe Beauty Health Co.1 5 0 WALDWaldencast Plc2 3 0 -
Is SKIN or WALD More Risky?
The Beauty Health Co. has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.782% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Waldencast Plc has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SKIN or WALD?
The Beauty Health Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Waldencast Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Beauty Health Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waldencast Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SKIN or WALD?
The Beauty Health Co. quarterly revenues are $70.7M, which are larger than Waldencast Plc quarterly revenues of --. The Beauty Health Co.'s net income of -$11M is higher than Waldencast Plc's net income of --. Notably, The Beauty Health Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Waldencast Plc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Beauty Health Co. is 0.46x versus 0.65x for Waldencast Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SKINThe Beauty Health Co.0.46x -- $70.7M -$11M WALDWaldencast Plc0.65x -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 3.64% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 5.43% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 1.4% over the past day.
