Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
16
WALD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.59
Seasonality move
:
-9.88%
Day range:
$1.57 - $1.63
52-week range:
$1.45 - $3.54
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.65x
P/B ratio:
0.31x
Volume:
124.4K
Avg. volume:
64K
1-year change:
-50.16%
Market cap:
$201.1M
Revenue:
$273.9M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.39
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WALD
Waldencast Plc
|
$72.8M | -$0.11 | 18.69% | -- | $3.08 |
|
EWCZ
European Wax Center, Inc.
|
$46.2M | $0.06 | 3.45% | 279.53% | $7.64 |
|
FKST
Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SKIN
The Beauty Health Co.
|
$78.1M | -$0.05 | -2.02% | -66.08% | $2.03 |
|
SLSN
Solesence, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNBH
Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WALD
Waldencast Plc
|
$1.58 | $3.08 | $201.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.65x |
|
EWCZ
European Wax Center, Inc.
|
$5.73 | $7.64 | $252.2M | 28.09x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.20x |
|
FKST
Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.
|
$5.04 | -- | $17.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SKIN
The Beauty Health Co.
|
$1.08 | $2.03 | $137.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.46x |
|
SLSN
Solesence, Inc.
|
$1.18 | -- | $83.2M | 84.29x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.36x |
|
SNBH
Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.
|
$0.02 | -- | $74.3K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.63x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WALD
Waldencast Plc
|
20.1% | 0.564 | 29.71% | 0.53x |
|
EWCZ
European Wax Center, Inc.
|
82.83% | 5.122 | 209.03% | 2.17x |
|
FKST
Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.
|
-- | -26.905 | -- | -- |
|
SKIN
The Beauty Health Co.
|
85.23% | 5.040 | 149.6% | 4.02x |
|
SLSN
Solesence, Inc.
|
59.38% | 2.823 | 11.09% | 0.66x |
|
SNBH
Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.
|
-108.09% | -2.273 | 9.33% | 0.10x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WALD
Waldencast Plc
|
-- | -- | -4.62% | -5.64% | -- | -- |
|
EWCZ
European Wax Center, Inc.
|
$27.8M | $4.5M | 2.46% | 11.74% | 9.88% | $7.1M |
|
FKST
Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SKIN
The Beauty Health Co.
|
$45.6M | -$6.2M | -2.13% | -19.76% | -8.84% | $8.6M |
|
SLSN
Solesence, Inc.
|
$3.4M | -$781K | 2.86% | 6.62% | -5.35% | -$2.9M |
|
SNBH
Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.
|
$236.3K | $31.4K | -- | -- | 8.4% | -$28.6K |
Waldencast Plc vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns WALD or EWCZ?
European Wax Center, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Waldencast Plc's net margin of -3.24%. Waldencast Plc's return on equity of -5.64% beat European Wax Center, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WALDWaldencast Plc-- -- $896.6M EWCZEuropean Wax Center, Inc.61.68% -$0.01 $487.2M -
What do Analysts Say About WALD or EWCZ?
Waldencast Plc has a consensus price target of $3.08, signalling upside risk potential of 94.62%. On the other hand European Wax Center, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.64 which suggests that it could grow by 33.33%. Given that Waldencast Plc has higher upside potential than European Wax Center, Inc., analysts believe Waldencast Plc is more attractive than European Wax Center, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WALDWaldencast Plc2 3 0 EWCZEuropean Wax Center, Inc.1 3 0 -
Is WALD or EWCZ More Risky?
Waldencast Plc has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison European Wax Center, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WALD or EWCZ?
Waldencast Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. European Wax Center, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waldencast Plc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. European Wax Center, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WALD or EWCZ?
Waldencast Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than European Wax Center, Inc. quarterly revenues of $45.1M. Waldencast Plc's net income of -- is lower than European Wax Center, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Waldencast Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while European Wax Center, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waldencast Plc is 0.65x versus 1.20x for European Wax Center, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WALDWaldencast Plc0.65x -- -- -- EWCZEuropean Wax Center, Inc.1.20x 28.09x $45.1M -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns WALD or FKST?
Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Waldencast Plc's net margin of --. Waldencast Plc's return on equity of -5.64% beat Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WALDWaldencast Plc-- -- $896.6M FKSTFlowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About WALD or FKST?
Waldencast Plc has a consensus price target of $3.08, signalling upside risk potential of 94.62%. On the other hand Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Waldencast Plc has higher upside potential than Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc., analysts believe Waldencast Plc is more attractive than Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WALDWaldencast Plc2 3 0 FKSTFlowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is WALD or FKST More Risky?
Waldencast Plc has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc. has a beta of -2.422, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 342.204%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WALD or FKST?
Waldencast Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waldencast Plc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WALD or FKST?
Waldencast Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Waldencast Plc's net income of -- is lower than Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Waldencast Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waldencast Plc is 0.65x versus -- for Flowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WALDWaldencast Plc0.65x -- -- -- FKSTFlowerkist Skin Care & Cosmetics, Inc.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns WALD or SKIN?
The Beauty Health Co. has a net margin of -- compared to Waldencast Plc's net margin of -15.61%. Waldencast Plc's return on equity of -5.64% beat The Beauty Health Co.'s return on equity of -19.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WALDWaldencast Plc-- -- $896.6M SKINThe Beauty Health Co.64.59% -$0.09 $444.6M -
What do Analysts Say About WALD or SKIN?
Waldencast Plc has a consensus price target of $3.08, signalling upside risk potential of 94.62%. On the other hand The Beauty Health Co. has an analysts' consensus of $2.03 which suggests that it could grow by 87.96%. Given that Waldencast Plc has higher upside potential than The Beauty Health Co., analysts believe Waldencast Plc is more attractive than The Beauty Health Co..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WALDWaldencast Plc2 3 0 SKINThe Beauty Health Co.1 5 0 -
Is WALD or SKIN More Risky?
Waldencast Plc has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Beauty Health Co. has a beta of 1.198, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.782%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WALD or SKIN?
Waldencast Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Beauty Health Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waldencast Plc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Beauty Health Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WALD or SKIN?
Waldencast Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Beauty Health Co. quarterly revenues of $70.7M. Waldencast Plc's net income of -- is lower than The Beauty Health Co.'s net income of -$11M. Notably, Waldencast Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Beauty Health Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waldencast Plc is 0.65x versus 0.46x for The Beauty Health Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WALDWaldencast Plc0.65x -- -- -- SKINThe Beauty Health Co.0.46x -- $70.7M -$11M
-
Which has Higher Returns WALD or SLSN?
Solesence, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Waldencast Plc's net margin of -7.67%. Waldencast Plc's return on equity of -5.64% beat Solesence, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WALDWaldencast Plc-- -- $896.6M SLSNSolesence, Inc.23.09% -$0.02 $42.4M -
What do Analysts Say About WALD or SLSN?
Waldencast Plc has a consensus price target of $3.08, signalling upside risk potential of 94.62%. On the other hand Solesence, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Waldencast Plc has higher upside potential than Solesence, Inc., analysts believe Waldencast Plc is more attractive than Solesence, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WALDWaldencast Plc2 3 0 SLSNSolesence, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is WALD or SLSN More Risky?
Waldencast Plc has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solesence, Inc. has a beta of 1.099, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.887%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WALD or SLSN?
Waldencast Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solesence, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waldencast Plc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solesence, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WALD or SLSN?
Waldencast Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Solesence, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.6M. Waldencast Plc's net income of -- is lower than Solesence, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Waldencast Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solesence, Inc.'s PE ratio is 84.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waldencast Plc is 0.65x versus 1.36x for Solesence, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WALDWaldencast Plc0.65x -- -- -- SLSNSolesence, Inc.1.36x 84.29x $14.6M -$1.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns WALD or SNBH?
Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Waldencast Plc's net margin of -1.07%. Waldencast Plc's return on equity of -5.64% beat Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WALDWaldencast Plc-- -- $896.6M SNBHSentient Brands Holdings, Inc.63.22% -$0.00 -$713.7K -
What do Analysts Say About WALD or SNBH?
Waldencast Plc has a consensus price target of $3.08, signalling upside risk potential of 94.62%. On the other hand Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Waldencast Plc has higher upside potential than Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Waldencast Plc is more attractive than Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WALDWaldencast Plc2 3 0 SNBHSentient Brands Holdings, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is WALD or SNBH More Risky?
Waldencast Plc has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -0.096, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.641%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WALD or SNBH?
Waldencast Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Waldencast Plc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WALD or SNBH?
Waldencast Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $373.8K. Waldencast Plc's net income of -- is lower than Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$4K. Notably, Waldencast Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Waldencast Plc is 0.65x versus 3.63x for Sentient Brands Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WALDWaldencast Plc0.65x -- -- -- SNBHSentient Brands Holdings, Inc.3.63x -- $373.8K -$4K
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 3.64% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 5
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 1.4% over the past day.
Sell
49
TREE alert for Mar 4
LendingTree, Inc. [TREE] is up 1.11% over the past day.
