SKFOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bachem Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Sika AG's net margin of --. Sika AG's return on equity of 18.94% beat Bachem Holding AG's return on equity of 9.99%.

Sika AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bachem Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sika AG has higher upside potential than Bachem Holding AG, analysts believe Sika AG is more attractive than Bachem Holding AG.

Sika AG has a beta of 1.183, which suggesting that the stock is 18.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bachem Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sika AG has a quarterly dividend of $2.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Bachem Holding AG offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Sika AG pays 46.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Bachem Holding AG pays out 35.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sika AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bachem Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. Sika AG's net income of -- is lower than Bachem Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, Sika AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.41x while Bachem Holding AG's PE ratio is 32.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sika AG is 2.47x versus 6.48x for Bachem Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clariant AG has a net margin of -- compared to Sika AG's net margin of --. Sika AG's return on equity of 18.94% beat Clariant AG's return on equity of 10.24%.

Sika AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Clariant AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sika AG has higher upside potential than Clariant AG, analysts believe Sika AG is more attractive than Clariant AG.

Sika AG has a beta of 1.183, which suggesting that the stock is 18.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clariant AG has a beta of 0.449, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.062%.

Sika AG has a quarterly dividend of $2.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Clariant AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Sika AG pays 46.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Clariant AG pays out 52.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sika AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Clariant AG quarterly revenues of --. Sika AG's net income of -- is lower than Clariant AG's net income of --. Notably, Sika AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.41x while Clariant AG's PE ratio is 22.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sika AG is 2.47x versus 0.63x for Clariant AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Givaudan SA has a net margin of -- compared to Sika AG's net margin of --. Sika AG's return on equity of 18.94% beat Givaudan SA's return on equity of 25.75%.

Sika AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Givaudan SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sika AG has higher upside potential than Givaudan SA, analysts believe Sika AG is more attractive than Givaudan SA.

Sika AG has a beta of 1.183, which suggesting that the stock is 18.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Givaudan SA has a beta of 0.787, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.261%.

Sika AG has a quarterly dividend of $2.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Givaudan SA offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.58 per share. Sika AG pays 46.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Givaudan SA pays out 35.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sika AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Givaudan SA quarterly revenues of --. Sika AG's net income of -- is lower than Givaudan SA's net income of --. Notably, Sika AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.41x while Givaudan SA's PE ratio is 28.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sika AG is 2.47x versus 4.19x for Givaudan SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Holcim Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sika AG's net margin of --. Sika AG's return on equity of 18.94% beat Holcim Ltd.'s return on equity of 69.32%.

Sika AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Holcim Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sika AG has higher upside potential than Holcim Ltd., analysts believe Sika AG is more attractive than Holcim Ltd..

Sika AG has a beta of 1.183, which suggesting that the stock is 18.293% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Holcim Ltd. has a beta of 1.029, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.9%.

Sika AG has a quarterly dividend of $2.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Holcim Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $10.63 per share. Sika AG pays 46.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Holcim Ltd. pays out 58.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sika AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Holcim Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sika AG's net income of -- is lower than Holcim Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sika AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.41x while Holcim Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sika AG is 2.47x versus 2.17x for Holcim Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.