HCMLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Clariant AG has a net margin of -- compared to Holcim's net margin of --. Holcim's return on equity of 10.97% beat Clariant AG's return on equity of 3.32%.

Holcim has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Clariant AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Holcim has higher upside potential than Clariant AG, analysts believe Holcim is more attractive than Clariant AG.

Holcim has a beta of 1.205, which suggesting that the stock is 20.507% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clariant AG has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.441%.

Holcim has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. Clariant AG offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Holcim pays 46.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Clariant AG pays out 102.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Holcim's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clariant AG's is not.

Holcim quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Clariant AG quarterly revenues of --. Holcim's net income of -- is lower than Clariant AG's net income of --. Notably, Holcim's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.15x while Clariant AG's PE ratio is 45.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Holcim is 1.82x versus 0.88x for Clariant AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Holcim's net margin of --. Holcim's return on equity of 10.97% beat Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25%.

Holcim has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ems-Chemie Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Holcim has higher upside potential than Ems-Chemie Holding AG, analysts believe Holcim is more attractive than Ems-Chemie Holding AG.

Holcim has a beta of 1.205, which suggesting that the stock is 20.507% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.547, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.347%.

Holcim has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. Ems-Chemie Holding AG offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share. Holcim pays 46.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays out 102.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Holcim's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ems-Chemie Holding AG's is not.

Holcim quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. Holcim's net income of -- is lower than Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, Holcim's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.15x while Ems-Chemie Holding AG's PE ratio is 31.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Holcim is 1.82x versus 7.04x for Ems-Chemie Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Givaudan SA has a net margin of -- compared to Holcim's net margin of --. Holcim's return on equity of 10.97% beat Givaudan SA's return on equity of 24.76%.

Holcim has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Givaudan SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Holcim has higher upside potential than Givaudan SA, analysts believe Holcim is more attractive than Givaudan SA.

Holcim has a beta of 1.205, which suggesting that the stock is 20.507% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Givaudan SA has a beta of 0.724, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.563%.

Holcim has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. Givaudan SA offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Holcim pays 46.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Givaudan SA pays out 69.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Holcim quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Givaudan SA quarterly revenues of --. Holcim's net income of -- is lower than Givaudan SA's net income of --. Notably, Holcim's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.15x while Givaudan SA's PE ratio is 35.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Holcim is 1.82x versus 5.13x for Givaudan SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sika AG has a net margin of -- compared to Holcim's net margin of --. Holcim's return on equity of 10.97% beat Sika AG's return on equity of 21.13%.

Holcim has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sika AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Holcim has higher upside potential than Sika AG, analysts believe Holcim is more attractive than Sika AG.

Holcim has a beta of 1.205, which suggesting that the stock is 20.507% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sika AG has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.098%.

Holcim has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. Sika AG offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Holcim pays 46.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Sika AG pays out 46.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Holcim quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sika AG quarterly revenues of --. Holcim's net income of -- is lower than Sika AG's net income of --. Notably, Holcim's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.15x while Sika AG's PE ratio is 27.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Holcim is 1.82x versus 2.93x for Sika AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.