Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
$1.4B | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EMSHF
EMS-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
$15.48 | -- | $42.6B | 46.13x | $10.63 | 0% | 2.26x |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
$7.71 | -- | $5.8B | 31.85x | $0.05 | 0.67% | 6.87x |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
$9.32 | -- | $3.1B | 114.99x | $0.44 | 0% | 0.65x |
|
EMSHF
EMS-Chemie Holding AG
|
$794.49 | -- | $18.6B | 63.97x | $21.40 | 2.18% | 7.92x |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
$70.69 | -- | $32.6B | 25.50x | $1.58 | 2.24% | 3.65x |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
$16.79 | -- | $26.9B | 21.48x | $0.36 | 1.21% | 2.00x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
-- | 0.815 | -- | 1.07x |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | 0.634 | -- | 0.78x |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
42.02% | -1.113 | -- | 1.01x |
|
EMSHF
EMS-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | 0.539 | -- | 2.39x |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
51.65% | -0.177 | -- | 0.75x |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
48.24% | -0.019 | -- | 1.14x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 58.83% | 69.32% | -- | -- |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | -- | 9.99% | 9.99% | -- | -- |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
-- | -- | 6.19% | 10.24% | -- | -- |
|
EMSHF
EMS-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -- | 23.16% | 23.25% | -- | -- |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
-- | -- | 12.56% | 25.75% | -- | -- |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
-- | -- | 10.13% | 18.94% | -- | -- |
Bachem Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Holcim Ltd.'s net margin of --. Holcim Ltd.'s return on equity of 69.32% beat Bachem Holding AG's return on equity of 9.99%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
-- | -- | $19.2B |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | -- | $1.7B |
Holcim Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bachem Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Holcim Ltd. has higher upside potential than Bachem Holding AG, analysts believe Holcim Ltd. is more attractive than Bachem Holding AG.
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Holcim Ltd. has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bachem Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
Holcim Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $10.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bachem Holding AG offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Holcim Ltd. pays 58.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Bachem Holding AG pays out 35.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Holcim Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bachem Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. Holcim Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Bachem Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, Holcim Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.13x while Bachem Holding AG's PE ratio is 31.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Holcim Ltd. is 2.26x versus 6.87x for Bachem Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
2.26x | 46.13x | -- | -- |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
6.87x | 31.85x | -- | -- |
Clariant AG has a net margin of -- compared to Holcim Ltd.'s net margin of --. Holcim Ltd.'s return on equity of 69.32% beat Clariant AG's return on equity of 10.24%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
-- | -- | $19.2B |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
-- | -- | $4.6B |
Holcim Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Clariant AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Holcim Ltd. has higher upside potential than Clariant AG, analysts believe Holcim Ltd. is more attractive than Clariant AG.
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Holcim Ltd. has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clariant AG has a beta of 0.408, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.152%.
Holcim Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $10.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Clariant AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Holcim Ltd. pays 58.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Clariant AG pays out 52.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Holcim Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Clariant AG quarterly revenues of --. Holcim Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Clariant AG's net income of --. Notably, Holcim Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.13x while Clariant AG's PE ratio is 114.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Holcim Ltd. is 2.26x versus 0.65x for Clariant AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
2.26x | 46.13x | -- | -- |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
0.65x | 114.99x | -- | -- |
EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Holcim Ltd.'s net margin of --. Holcim Ltd.'s return on equity of 69.32% beat EMS-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
-- | -- | $19.2B |
|
EMSHF
EMS-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -- | $2.3B |
Holcim Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EMS-Chemie Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Holcim Ltd. has higher upside potential than EMS-Chemie Holding AG, analysts believe Holcim Ltd. is more attractive than EMS-Chemie Holding AG.
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
EMSHF
EMS-Chemie Holding AG
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Holcim Ltd. has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.651, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.931%.
Holcim Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $10.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EMS-Chemie Holding AG offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $21.40 per share. Holcim Ltd. pays 58.67% of its earnings as a dividend. EMS-Chemie Holding AG pays out 87.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Holcim Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than EMS-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. Holcim Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than EMS-Chemie Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, Holcim Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.13x while EMS-Chemie Holding AG's PE ratio is 63.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Holcim Ltd. is 2.26x versus 7.92x for EMS-Chemie Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
2.26x | 46.13x | -- | -- |
|
EMSHF
EMS-Chemie Holding AG
|
7.92x | 63.97x | -- | -- |
Givaudan SA has a net margin of -- compared to Holcim Ltd.'s net margin of --. Holcim Ltd.'s return on equity of 69.32% beat Givaudan SA's return on equity of 25.75%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
-- | -- | $19.2B |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
-- | -- | $10.6B |
Holcim Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Givaudan SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Holcim Ltd. has higher upside potential than Givaudan SA, analysts believe Holcim Ltd. is more attractive than Givaudan SA.
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Holcim Ltd. has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Givaudan SA has a beta of 0.784, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.575%.
Holcim Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $10.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Givaudan SA offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.58 per share. Holcim Ltd. pays 58.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Givaudan SA pays out 35.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Holcim Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Givaudan SA quarterly revenues of --. Holcim Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Givaudan SA's net income of --. Notably, Holcim Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.13x while Givaudan SA's PE ratio is 25.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Holcim Ltd. is 2.26x versus 3.65x for Givaudan SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
2.26x | 46.13x | -- | -- |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
3.65x | 25.50x | -- | -- |
Sika AG has a net margin of -- compared to Holcim Ltd.'s net margin of --. Holcim Ltd.'s return on equity of 69.32% beat Sika AG's return on equity of 18.94%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
-- | -- | $19.2B |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
-- | -- | $15B |
Holcim Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sika AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Holcim Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sika AG, analysts believe Holcim Ltd. is more attractive than Sika AG.
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Holcim Ltd. has a beta of 1.049, which suggesting that the stock is 4.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sika AG has a beta of 1.284, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.433%.
Holcim Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $10.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sika AG offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Holcim Ltd. pays 58.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Sika AG pays out 28.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Holcim Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sika AG quarterly revenues of --. Holcim Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sika AG's net income of --. Notably, Holcim Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 46.13x while Sika AG's PE ratio is 21.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Holcim Ltd. is 2.26x versus 2.00x for Sika AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
2.26x | 46.13x | -- | -- |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
2.00x | 21.48x | -- | -- |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
American Public Education, Inc. [APEI] is up 26.24% over the past day.
Papa John's International, Inc. [PZZA] is down 5.25% over the past day.
Nebius Group NV [NBIS] is up 0.87% over the past day.