Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
63
BCHMY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$8.44
Seasonality move
:
-5.56%
Day range:
$8.44 - $8.44
52-week range:
$5.50 - $9.40
Dividend yield:
0.63%
P/E ratio:
33.79x
P/S ratio:
7.29x
P/B ratio:
3.61x
Volume:
612
Avg. volume:
1.3K
1-year change:
28.66%
Market cap:
$6.1B
Revenue:
$836.9M
EPS (TTM):
$0.24
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
$1.2B | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EMSHF
EMS-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
$8.44 | -- | $6.1B | 33.79x | $0.05 | 0.63% | 7.29x |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
$9.85 | -- | $3.2B | 114.99x | $0.44 | 5.58% | 0.69x |
|
EMSHF
EMS-Chemie Holding AG
|
$794.49 | -- | $18.6B | 33.15x | $21.40 | 2.18% | 7.92x |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
$68.24 | -- | $31.5B | 24.62x | $1.82 | 2.67% | 3.52x |
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
$16.91 | -- | $46.3B | 50.12x | $10.63 | 2.62% | 2.46x |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
$16.32 | -- | $25.8B | 20.54x | $0.43 | 1.48% | 1.91x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | 0.610 | -- | 0.78x |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
42.02% | 0.006 | -- | 1.01x |
|
EMSHF
EMS-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | 1.471 | -- | 2.39x |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
51.65% | 0.491 | -- | 0.75x |
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
-- | 1.386 | -- | 1.07x |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
48.24% | 0.957 | -- | 1.14x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | -- | 9.99% | 9.99% | -- | -- |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
-- | -- | 6.19% | 10.24% | -- | -- |
|
EMSHF
EMS-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -- | 23.16% | 23.25% | -- | -- |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
-- | -- | 12.56% | 25.75% | -- | -- |
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 58.83% | 69.32% | -- | -- |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
-- | -- | 10.13% | 18.94% | -- | -- |
Bachem Holding AG vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BCHMY or CLZNY?
Clariant AG has a net margin of -- compared to Bachem Holding AG's net margin of --. Bachem Holding AG's return on equity of 9.99% beat Clariant AG's return on equity of 10.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BCHMYBachem Holding AG-- -- $1.7B CLZNYClariant AG-- -- $4.6B -
What do Analysts Say About BCHMY or CLZNY?
Bachem Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Clariant AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bachem Holding AG has higher upside potential than Clariant AG, analysts believe Bachem Holding AG is more attractive than Clariant AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BCHMYBachem Holding AG0 0 0 CLZNYClariant AG0 0 0 -
Is BCHMY or CLZNY More Risky?
Bachem Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clariant AG has a beta of 0.428, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.212%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BCHMY or CLZNY?
Bachem Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Clariant AG offers a yield of 5.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Bachem Holding AG pays 35.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Clariant AG pays out 52.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BCHMY or CLZNY?
Bachem Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Clariant AG quarterly revenues of --. Bachem Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Clariant AG's net income of --. Notably, Bachem Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.79x while Clariant AG's PE ratio is 114.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bachem Holding AG is 7.29x versus 0.69x for Clariant AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BCHMYBachem Holding AG7.29x 33.79x -- -- CLZNYClariant AG0.69x 114.99x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BCHMY or EMSHF?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Bachem Holding AG's net margin of --. Bachem Holding AG's return on equity of 9.99% beat EMS-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BCHMYBachem Holding AG-- -- $1.7B EMSHFEMS-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B -
What do Analysts Say About BCHMY or EMSHF?
Bachem Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EMS-Chemie Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bachem Holding AG has higher upside potential than EMS-Chemie Holding AG, analysts believe Bachem Holding AG is more attractive than EMS-Chemie Holding AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BCHMYBachem Holding AG0 0 0 EMSHFEMS-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 -
Is BCHMY or EMSHF More Risky?
Bachem Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.584%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BCHMY or EMSHF?
Bachem Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. EMS-Chemie Holding AG offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $21.40 per share. Bachem Holding AG pays 35.37% of its earnings as a dividend. EMS-Chemie Holding AG pays out 87.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BCHMY or EMSHF?
Bachem Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than EMS-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. Bachem Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than EMS-Chemie Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, Bachem Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.79x while EMS-Chemie Holding AG's PE ratio is 33.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bachem Holding AG is 7.29x versus 7.92x for EMS-Chemie Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BCHMYBachem Holding AG7.29x 33.79x -- -- EMSHFEMS-Chemie Holding AG7.92x 33.15x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BCHMY or GVDNY?
Givaudan SA has a net margin of -- compared to Bachem Holding AG's net margin of --. Bachem Holding AG's return on equity of 9.99% beat Givaudan SA's return on equity of 25.75%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BCHMYBachem Holding AG-- -- $1.7B GVDNYGivaudan SA-- -- $10.6B -
What do Analysts Say About BCHMY or GVDNY?
Bachem Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Givaudan SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bachem Holding AG has higher upside potential than Givaudan SA, analysts believe Bachem Holding AG is more attractive than Givaudan SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BCHMYBachem Holding AG0 0 0 GVDNYGivaudan SA0 0 0 -
Is BCHMY or GVDNY More Risky?
Bachem Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Givaudan SA has a beta of 0.831, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.945%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BCHMY or GVDNY?
Bachem Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Givaudan SA offers a yield of 2.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. Bachem Holding AG pays 35.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Givaudan SA pays out 39.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BCHMY or GVDNY?
Bachem Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Givaudan SA quarterly revenues of --. Bachem Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Givaudan SA's net income of --. Notably, Bachem Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.79x while Givaudan SA's PE ratio is 24.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bachem Holding AG is 7.29x versus 3.52x for Givaudan SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BCHMYBachem Holding AG7.29x 33.79x -- -- GVDNYGivaudan SA3.52x 24.62x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BCHMY or HCMLY?
Holcim Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Bachem Holding AG's net margin of --. Bachem Holding AG's return on equity of 9.99% beat Holcim Ltd.'s return on equity of 69.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BCHMYBachem Holding AG-- -- $1.7B HCMLYHolcim Ltd.-- -- $19.2B -
What do Analysts Say About BCHMY or HCMLY?
Bachem Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Holcim Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bachem Holding AG has higher upside potential than Holcim Ltd., analysts believe Bachem Holding AG is more attractive than Holcim Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BCHMYBachem Holding AG0 0 0 HCMLYHolcim Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BCHMY or HCMLY More Risky?
Bachem Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Holcim Ltd. has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.483%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BCHMY or HCMLY?
Bachem Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Holcim Ltd. offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $10.63 per share. Bachem Holding AG pays 35.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Holcim Ltd. pays out 58.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BCHMY or HCMLY?
Bachem Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Holcim Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Bachem Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Holcim Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Bachem Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.79x while Holcim Ltd.'s PE ratio is 50.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bachem Holding AG is 7.29x versus 2.46x for Holcim Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BCHMYBachem Holding AG7.29x 33.79x -- -- HCMLYHolcim Ltd.2.46x 50.12x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BCHMY or SXYAY?
Sika AG has a net margin of -- compared to Bachem Holding AG's net margin of --. Bachem Holding AG's return on equity of 9.99% beat Sika AG's return on equity of 18.94%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BCHMYBachem Holding AG-- -- $1.7B SXYAYSika AG-- -- $15B -
What do Analysts Say About BCHMY or SXYAY?
Bachem Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sika AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bachem Holding AG has higher upside potential than Sika AG, analysts believe Bachem Holding AG is more attractive than Sika AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BCHMYBachem Holding AG0 0 0 SXYAYSika AG0 0 0 -
Is BCHMY or SXYAY More Risky?
Bachem Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sika AG has a beta of 1.329, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.94%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BCHMY or SXYAY?
Bachem Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Sika AG offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Bachem Holding AG pays 35.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Sika AG pays out 37.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BCHMY or SXYAY?
Bachem Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sika AG quarterly revenues of --. Bachem Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Sika AG's net income of --. Notably, Bachem Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.79x while Sika AG's PE ratio is 20.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bachem Holding AG is 7.29x versus 1.91x for Sika AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BCHMYBachem Holding AG7.29x 33.79x -- -- SXYAYSika AG1.91x 20.54x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
49
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 5
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 5
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 5
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
