Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
49
EMSHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$703.72
Seasonality move
:
-2.01%
Day range:
$703.72 - $703.72
52-week range:
$681.11 - $855.98
Dividend yield:
2.09%
P/E ratio:
31.96x
P/S ratio:
7.04x
P/B ratio:
7.40x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-9.78%
Market cap:
$16.5B
Revenue:
$2.4B
EPS (TTM):
$22.02
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
$1.2B | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
$703.72 | -- | $16.5B | 31.96x | $18.49 | 2.09% | 7.04x |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
$6.47 | -- | $4.9B | 38.15x | $0.04 | 1.35% | 7.52x |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
$12.38 | -- | $4.1B | 45.64x | $0.47 | 3.8% | 0.88x |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
$88.08 | -- | $40.6B | 35.43x | $1.50 | 1.71% | 5.13x |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
$19.26 | -- | $54.1B | 16.15x | $0.62 | 3.21% | 1.82x |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
$23.80 | -- | $38.2B | 27.83x | $0.36 | 1.53% | 2.93x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | 0.259 | -- | 2.39x |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | 1.067 | -- | 1.57x |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
45.79% | -1.031 | 38.27% | 0.79x |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
53.25% | 1.034 | 12.51% | 0.84x |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
-- | 1.293 | -- | 0.79x |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
48.29% | 1.407 | 14.55% | 1.00x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
Ems-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -- | 23.16% | 23.25% | -- | -- |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | -- | 8.65% | 8.65% | -- | -- |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
-- | -- | 2.13% | 3.32% | -- | -- |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
-- | -- | 11.36% | 24.76% | -- | -- |
|
HCMLY
Holcim
|
-- | -- | 9.38% | 10.97% | -- | -- |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
-- | -- | 9.98% | 21.13% | -- | -- |
Ems-Chemie Holding AG vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or BCHMY?
Bachem Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Bachem Holding AG's return on equity of 8.65%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B BCHMYBachem Holding AG-- -- $1.5B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or BCHMY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bachem Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Bachem Holding AG, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Bachem Holding AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 BCHMYBachem Holding AG0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or BCHMY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.347% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bachem Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or BCHMY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.09%. Bachem Holding AG offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 102.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Bachem Holding AG pays out 50.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Bachem Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ems-Chemie Holding AG's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or BCHMY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bachem Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Bachem Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.96x while Bachem Holding AG's PE ratio is 38.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.04x versus 7.52x for Bachem Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.04x 31.96x -- -- BCHMYBachem Holding AG7.52x 38.15x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or CLZNY?
Clariant AG has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Clariant AG's return on equity of 3.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B CLZNYClariant AG-- -- $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or CLZNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Clariant AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Clariant AG, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Clariant AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 CLZNYClariant AG0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or CLZNY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.347% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clariant AG has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.441%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or CLZNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.09%. Clariant AG offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 102.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Clariant AG pays out 102.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or CLZNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Clariant AG quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Clariant AG's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.96x while Clariant AG's PE ratio is 45.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.04x versus 0.88x for Clariant AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.04x 31.96x -- -- CLZNYClariant AG0.88x 45.64x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or GVDNY?
Givaudan SA has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Givaudan SA's return on equity of 24.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B GVDNYGivaudan SA-- -- $10.3B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or GVDNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Givaudan SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Givaudan SA, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Givaudan SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 GVDNYGivaudan SA0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or GVDNY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.347% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Givaudan SA has a beta of 0.724, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.563%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or GVDNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.09%. Givaudan SA offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 102.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Givaudan SA pays out 69.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Givaudan SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ems-Chemie Holding AG's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or GVDNY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Givaudan SA quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Givaudan SA's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.96x while Givaudan SA's PE ratio is 35.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.04x versus 5.13x for Givaudan SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.04x 31.96x -- -- GVDNYGivaudan SA5.13x 35.43x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or HCMLY?
Holcim has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Holcim's return on equity of 10.97%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B HCMLYHolcim-- -- $30.1B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or HCMLY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Holcim has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Holcim, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Holcim.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 HCMLYHolcim0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or HCMLY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.347% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Holcim has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.507%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or HCMLY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.09%. Holcim offers a yield of 3.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 102.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Holcim pays out 46.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Holcim's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ems-Chemie Holding AG's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or HCMLY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Holcim quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Holcim's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.96x while Holcim's PE ratio is 16.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.04x versus 1.82x for Holcim. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.04x 31.96x -- -- HCMLYHolcim1.82x 16.15x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or SXYAY?
Sika AG has a net margin of -- compared to Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Sika AG's return on equity of 21.13%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B SXYAYSika AG-- -- $13.8B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or SXYAY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sika AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ems-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Sika AG, analysts believe Ems-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Sika AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 SXYAYSika AG0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or SXYAY More Risky?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.347% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sika AG has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.098%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or SXYAY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.09%. Sika AG offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays 102.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Sika AG pays out 46.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Sika AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ems-Chemie Holding AG's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or SXYAY?
Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sika AG quarterly revenues of --. Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Sika AG's net income of --. Notably, Ems-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.96x while Sika AG's PE ratio is 27.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ems-Chemie Holding AG is 7.04x versus 2.93x for Sika AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEms-Chemie Holding AG7.04x 31.96x -- -- SXYAYSika AG2.93x 27.83x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
