Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
31
EMSHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$794.49
Seasonality move
:
4.08%
Day range:
$794.49 - $794.49
52-week range:
$619.19 - $833.96
Dividend yield:
2.18%
P/E ratio:
33.15x
P/S ratio:
7.92x
P/B ratio:
8.81x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
9
1-year change:
2.93%
Market cap:
$18.6B
Revenue:
$2.3B
EPS (TTM):
$23.97
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
EMS-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
$1.2B | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
EMS-Chemie Holding AG
|
$794.49 | -- | $18.6B | 33.15x | $21.40 | 2.18% | 7.92x |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
$8.44 | -- | $6.1B | 33.79x | $0.05 | 0.63% | 7.29x |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
$9.85 | -- | $3.2B | 114.99x | $0.44 | 5.58% | 0.69x |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
$68.24 | -- | $31.5B | 24.62x | $1.82 | 2.67% | 3.52x |
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
$16.91 | -- | $46.3B | 50.12x | $10.63 | 2.62% | 2.46x |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
$16.32 | -- | $25.8B | 20.54x | $0.43 | 1.48% | 1.91x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
EMS-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | 1.471 | -- | 2.39x |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | 0.610 | -- | 0.78x |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
42.02% | 0.006 | -- | 1.01x |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
51.65% | 0.491 | -- | 0.75x |
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
-- | 1.386 | -- | 1.07x |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
48.24% | 0.957 | -- | 1.14x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
EMSHF
EMS-Chemie Holding AG
|
-- | -- | 23.16% | 23.25% | -- | -- |
|
BCHMY
Bachem Holding AG
|
-- | -- | 9.99% | 9.99% | -- | -- |
|
CLZNY
Clariant AG
|
-- | -- | 6.19% | 10.24% | -- | -- |
|
GVDNY
Givaudan SA
|
-- | -- | 12.56% | 25.75% | -- | -- |
|
HCMLY
Holcim Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 58.83% | 69.32% | -- | -- |
|
SXYAY
Sika AG
|
-- | -- | 10.13% | 18.94% | -- | -- |
EMS-Chemie Holding AG vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or BCHMY?
Bachem Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to EMS-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. EMS-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Bachem Holding AG's return on equity of 9.99%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEMS-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B BCHMYBachem Holding AG-- -- $1.7B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or BCHMY?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bachem Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EMS-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Bachem Holding AG, analysts believe EMS-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Bachem Holding AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEMS-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 BCHMYBachem Holding AG0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or BCHMY More Risky?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.584% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bachem Holding AG has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or BCHMY?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $21.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Bachem Holding AG offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. EMS-Chemie Holding AG pays 87.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Bachem Holding AG pays out 35.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or BCHMY?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bachem Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. EMS-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Bachem Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, EMS-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.15x while Bachem Holding AG's PE ratio is 33.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EMS-Chemie Holding AG is 7.92x versus 7.29x for Bachem Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEMS-Chemie Holding AG7.92x 33.15x -- -- BCHMYBachem Holding AG7.29x 33.79x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or CLZNY?
Clariant AG has a net margin of -- compared to EMS-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. EMS-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Clariant AG's return on equity of 10.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEMS-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B CLZNYClariant AG-- -- $4.6B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or CLZNY?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Clariant AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EMS-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Clariant AG, analysts believe EMS-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Clariant AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEMS-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 CLZNYClariant AG0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or CLZNY More Risky?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.584% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clariant AG has a beta of 0.428, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.212%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or CLZNY?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $21.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Clariant AG offers a yield of 5.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. EMS-Chemie Holding AG pays 87.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Clariant AG pays out 52.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or CLZNY?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Clariant AG quarterly revenues of --. EMS-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Clariant AG's net income of --. Notably, EMS-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.15x while Clariant AG's PE ratio is 114.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EMS-Chemie Holding AG is 7.92x versus 0.69x for Clariant AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEMS-Chemie Holding AG7.92x 33.15x -- -- CLZNYClariant AG0.69x 114.99x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or GVDNY?
Givaudan SA has a net margin of -- compared to EMS-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. EMS-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Givaudan SA's return on equity of 25.75%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEMS-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B GVDNYGivaudan SA-- -- $10.6B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or GVDNY?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Givaudan SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EMS-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Givaudan SA, analysts believe EMS-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Givaudan SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEMS-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 GVDNYGivaudan SA0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or GVDNY More Risky?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.584% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Givaudan SA has a beta of 0.831, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.945%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or GVDNY?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $21.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Givaudan SA offers a yield of 2.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. EMS-Chemie Holding AG pays 87.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Givaudan SA pays out 39.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or GVDNY?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Givaudan SA quarterly revenues of --. EMS-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Givaudan SA's net income of --. Notably, EMS-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.15x while Givaudan SA's PE ratio is 24.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EMS-Chemie Holding AG is 7.92x versus 3.52x for Givaudan SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEMS-Chemie Holding AG7.92x 33.15x -- -- GVDNYGivaudan SA3.52x 24.62x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or HCMLY?
Holcim Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to EMS-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. EMS-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Holcim Ltd.'s return on equity of 69.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEMS-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B HCMLYHolcim Ltd.-- -- $19.2B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or HCMLY?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Holcim Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EMS-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Holcim Ltd., analysts believe EMS-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Holcim Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEMS-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 HCMLYHolcim Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or HCMLY More Risky?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.584% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Holcim Ltd. has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.483%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or HCMLY?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $21.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Holcim Ltd. offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $10.63 per share. EMS-Chemie Holding AG pays 87.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Holcim Ltd. pays out 58.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or HCMLY?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Holcim Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. EMS-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Holcim Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, EMS-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.15x while Holcim Ltd.'s PE ratio is 50.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EMS-Chemie Holding AG is 7.92x versus 2.46x for Holcim Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEMS-Chemie Holding AG7.92x 33.15x -- -- HCMLYHolcim Ltd.2.46x 50.12x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns EMSHF or SXYAY?
Sika AG has a net margin of -- compared to EMS-Chemie Holding AG's net margin of --. EMS-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25% beat Sika AG's return on equity of 18.94%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital EMSHFEMS-Chemie Holding AG-- -- $2.3B SXYAYSika AG-- -- $15B -
What do Analysts Say About EMSHF or SXYAY?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sika AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EMS-Chemie Holding AG has higher upside potential than Sika AG, analysts believe EMS-Chemie Holding AG is more attractive than Sika AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings EMSHFEMS-Chemie Holding AG0 0 0 SXYAYSika AG0 0 0 -
Is EMSHF or SXYAY More Risky?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.584% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sika AG has a beta of 1.329, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.94%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMSHF or SXYAY?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $21.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Sika AG offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. EMS-Chemie Holding AG pays 87.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Sika AG pays out 37.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios EMSHF or SXYAY?
EMS-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sika AG quarterly revenues of --. EMS-Chemie Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Sika AG's net income of --. Notably, EMS-Chemie Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.15x while Sika AG's PE ratio is 20.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EMS-Chemie Holding AG is 7.92x versus 1.91x for Sika AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income EMSHFEMS-Chemie Holding AG7.92x 33.15x -- -- SXYAYSika AG1.91x 20.54x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
49
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 5
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 5
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 5
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
