SIELF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CBAK Energy Technology has a net margin of 0.59% compared to Shanghai Electric Group's net margin of 0.04%. Shanghai Electric Group's return on equity of 0.28% beat CBAK Energy Technology's return on equity of 9.43%.

Shanghai Electric Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CBAK Energy Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 92.31%. Given that CBAK Energy Technology has higher upside potential than Shanghai Electric Group, analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology is more attractive than Shanghai Electric Group.

Shanghai Electric Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 1.742, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.216%.

Shanghai Electric Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CBAK Energy Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shanghai Electric Group pays 602.77% of its earnings as a dividend. CBAK Energy Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shanghai Electric Group quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than CBAK Energy Technology quarterly revenues of $44.6M. Shanghai Electric Group's net income of $21.9M is higher than CBAK Energy Technology's net income of $17.7K. Notably, Shanghai Electric Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 182.98x while CBAK Energy Technology's PE ratio is 8.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shanghai Electric Group is 0.36x versus 0.45x for CBAK Energy Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EHang Holdings has a net margin of 0.59% compared to Shanghai Electric Group's net margin of -37.51%. Shanghai Electric Group's return on equity of 0.28% beat EHang Holdings's return on equity of -61.77%.

Shanghai Electric Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EHang Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $24.29 which suggests that it could grow by 51.89%. Given that EHang Holdings has higher upside potential than Shanghai Electric Group, analysts believe EHang Holdings is more attractive than Shanghai Electric Group.

Shanghai Electric Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EHang Holdings has a beta of 0.940, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.982%.

Shanghai Electric Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EHang Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shanghai Electric Group pays 602.77% of its earnings as a dividend. EHang Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shanghai Electric Group quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than EHang Holdings quarterly revenues of $17.9M. Shanghai Electric Group's net income of $21.9M is higher than EHang Holdings's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Shanghai Electric Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 182.98x while EHang Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shanghai Electric Group is 0.36x versus 21.46x for EHang Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a net margin of 0.59% compared to Shanghai Electric Group's net margin of --. Shanghai Electric Group's return on equity of 0.28% beat NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's return on equity of 8.22%.

Shanghai Electric Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1365.38%. Given that NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has higher upside potential than Shanghai Electric Group, analysts believe NiSun International Enterprise Development Group is more attractive than Shanghai Electric Group.

Shanghai Electric Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.603%.

Shanghai Electric Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shanghai Electric Group pays 602.77% of its earnings as a dividend. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shanghai Electric Group quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group quarterly revenues of --. Shanghai Electric Group's net income of $21.9M is higher than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's net income of --. Notably, Shanghai Electric Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 182.98x while NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's PE ratio is 1.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shanghai Electric Group is 0.36x versus 0.05x for NiSun International Enterprise Development Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a net margin of 0.59% compared to Shanghai Electric Group's net margin of --. Shanghai Electric Group's return on equity of 0.28% beat MingZhu Logistics Holdings's return on equity of --.

Shanghai Electric Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MingZhu Logistics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shanghai Electric Group has higher upside potential than MingZhu Logistics Holdings, analysts believe Shanghai Electric Group is more attractive than MingZhu Logistics Holdings.

Shanghai Electric Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Shanghai Electric Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MingZhu Logistics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shanghai Electric Group pays 602.77% of its earnings as a dividend. MingZhu Logistics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shanghai Electric Group quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than MingZhu Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Shanghai Electric Group's net income of $21.9M is higher than MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Shanghai Electric Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 182.98x while MingZhu Logistics Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shanghai Electric Group is 0.36x versus 0.06x for MingZhu Logistics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.