Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
86
SIELF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.50
Seasonality move
:
0.62%
Day range:
$0.50 - $0.50
52-week range:
$0.32 - $0.50
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
53.70x
P/S ratio:
0.47x
P/B ratio:
1.03x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
135
1-year change:
40.95%
Market cap:
$7.8B
Revenue:
$16.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.01
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SIELF
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
$64.6M | -- | 154.52% | -- | $1.50 |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SIELF
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.
|
$0.50 | -- | $7.8B | 53.70x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.47x |
|
AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.
|
$1.77 | -- | $9.2M | 0.09x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.07x |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
$1.07 | -- | $4.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.06x |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
|
$0.39 | -- | $4.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.68x |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
$0.84 | $1.50 | $74M | 5,082.14x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.46x |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
$1.07 | -- | $5.1M | 2.83x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.02x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SIELF
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.
|
56.45% | -0.677 | 107.23% | 0.52x |
|
AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.
|
26.7% | 1.168 | 18.7% | 2.59x |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
-3.29% | -2.212 | 1.23% | 0.14x |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
|
2.43% | 0.591 | 5.49% | 16.39x |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
23.84% | 2.204 | 51.39% | 0.50x |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
1.33% | -0.008 | 15.23% | 2.08x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SIELF
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.
|
$699.1M | $20.6M | 1.87% | 3.5% | 0.53% | -$148.4M |
|
AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -15.63% | -28.71% | -- | -- |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
$274.1K | -$755.1K | -211.34% | -263.14% | -80.65% | -$73.4K |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
|
$225.1K | -$449.8K | -10.36% | -18.03% | -54.81% | -$700K |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
$4.9M | -$4M | -5.52% | -7.17% | -6.62% | $6M |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 8.14% | 8.22% | -- | -- |
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SIELF or AEHL?
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 2.07% compared to Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.5% beat Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -28.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SIELFShanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.17.89% $0.00 $21B AEHLAntelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.-- -- $24.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SIELF or AEHL?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SIELFShanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 AEHLAntelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SIELF or AEHL More Risky?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.127, which suggesting that the stock is 87.304% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.527%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SIELF or AEHL?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SIELF or AEHL?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of $80.7M is higher than Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.70x while Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. is 0.47x versus 0.07x for Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SIELFShanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.0.47x 53.70x $3.9B $80.7M AEHLAntelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.0.07x 0.09x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SIELF or AIHS?
Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a net margin of 2.07% compared to Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s net margin of -77.29%. Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.5% beat Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -263.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SIELFShanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.17.89% $0.00 $21B AIHSSenmiao Technology Ltd.29.28% -$0.43 $9.9K -
What do Analysts Say About SIELF or AIHS?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Senmiao Technology Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Senmiao Technology Ltd., analysts believe Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Senmiao Technology Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SIELFShanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 AIHSSenmiao Technology Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SIELF or AIHS More Risky?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.127, which suggesting that the stock is 87.304% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a beta of 0.968, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.189%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SIELF or AIHS?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Senmiao Technology Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Senmiao Technology Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SIELF or AIHS?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Senmiao Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues of $936.3K. Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of $80.7M is higher than Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s net income of -$723.7K. Notably, Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.70x while Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. is 0.47x versus 1.06x for Senmiao Technology Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SIELFShanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.0.47x 53.70x $3.9B $80.7M AIHSSenmiao Technology Ltd.1.06x -- $936.3K -$723.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns SIELF or ATXG?
Addentax Group Corp. has a net margin of 2.07% compared to Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s net margin of -101.37%. Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.5% beat Addentax Group Corp.'s return on equity of -18.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SIELFShanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.17.89% $0.00 $21B ATXGAddentax Group Corp.27.43% -$0.01 $26.5M -
What do Analysts Say About SIELF or ATXG?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Addentax Group Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Addentax Group Corp., analysts believe Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Addentax Group Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SIELFShanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 ATXGAddentax Group Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SIELF or ATXG More Risky?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.127, which suggesting that the stock is 87.304% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Addentax Group Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SIELF or ATXG?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Addentax Group Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Addentax Group Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SIELF or ATXG?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Addentax Group Corp. quarterly revenues of $820.7K. Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of $80.7M is higher than Addentax Group Corp.'s net income of -$831.9K. Notably, Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.70x while Addentax Group Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. is 0.47x versus 0.68x for Addentax Group Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SIELFShanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.0.47x 53.70x $3.9B $80.7M ATXGAddentax Group Corp.0.68x -- $820.7K -$831.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns SIELF or CBAT?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 2.07% compared to Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 3.42%. Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.5% beat CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SIELFShanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.17.89% $0.00 $21B CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.8% $0.03 $156.5M -
What do Analysts Say About SIELF or CBAT?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 79.62%. Given that CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd., analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is more attractive than Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SIELFShanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SIELF or CBAT More Risky?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.127, which suggesting that the stock is 87.304% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.197, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.654%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SIELF or CBAT?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SIELF or CBAT?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $60.9M. Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of $80.7M is higher than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M. Notably, Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.70x while CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5,082.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. is 0.47x versus 0.46x for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SIELFShanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.0.47x 53.70x $3.9B $80.7M CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0.46x 5,082.14x $60.9M $2.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns SIELF or NISN?
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 2.07% compared to Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.5% beat Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SIELFShanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.17.89% $0.00 $21B NISNNisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.-- -- $211.6M -
What do Analysts Say About SIELF or NISN?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8404.67%. Given that Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd., analysts believe Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SIELFShanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 NISNNisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SIELF or NISN More Risky?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.127, which suggesting that the stock is 87.304% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 1.591, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.131%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SIELF or NISN?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SIELF or NISN?
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of $80.7M is higher than Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.70x while Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 2.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd. is 0.47x versus 0.02x for Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SIELFShanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd.0.47x 53.70x $3.9B $80.7M NISNNisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.0.02x 2.83x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
30
CORT alert for Jan 1
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc. [CORT] is down 50.44% over the past day.
Buy
75
AXSM alert for Jan 1
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. [AXSM] is up 22.82% over the past day.
Buy
81
ZIJMY alert for Jan 1
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd. [ZIJMY] is up 1.86% over the past day.
