SHMDF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Linkage Global, Inc. has a net margin of 10.76% compared to Shimano, Inc.'s net margin of --. Shimano, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.95% beat Linkage Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -42.09%.

Shimano, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Linkage Global, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shimano, Inc. has higher upside potential than Linkage Global, Inc., analysts believe Shimano, Inc. is more attractive than Linkage Global, Inc..

Shimano, Inc. has a beta of 0.550, which suggesting that the stock is 45.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Linkage Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Shimano, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Linkage Global, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shimano, Inc. pays 36.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Linkage Global, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shimano, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shimano, Inc. quarterly revenues are $770.4M, which are larger than Linkage Global, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Shimano, Inc.'s net income of $82.9M is higher than Linkage Global, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Shimano, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.84x while Linkage Global, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimano, Inc. is 2.86x versus 2.85x for Linkage Global, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 10.76% compared to Shimano, Inc.'s net margin of --. Shimano, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.95% beat MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Shimano, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.98 which suggests that it could grow by 134.64%. Given that MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Shimano, Inc., analysts believe MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Shimano, Inc..

Shimano, Inc. has a beta of 0.550, which suggesting that the stock is 45.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Shimano, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shimano, Inc. pays 36.21% of its earnings as a dividend. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shimano, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shimano, Inc. quarterly revenues are $770.4M, which are larger than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Shimano, Inc.'s net income of $82.9M is higher than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Shimano, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.84x while MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimano, Inc. is 2.86x versus 0.26x for MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 10.76% compared to Shimano, Inc.'s net margin of --. Shimano, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.95% beat Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.49%.

Shimano, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shimano, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd., analysts believe Shimano, Inc. is more attractive than Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd..

Shimano, Inc. has a beta of 0.550, which suggesting that the stock is 45.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Shimano, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shimano, Inc. pays 36.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shimano, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shimano, Inc. quarterly revenues are $770.4M, which are larger than Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Shimano, Inc.'s net income of $82.9M is higher than Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Shimano, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.84x while Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 2.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimano, Inc. is 2.86x versus 0.05x for Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyota Motor Corp. has a net margin of 10.76% compared to Shimano, Inc.'s net margin of 7.86%. Shimano, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.95% beat Toyota Motor Corp.'s return on equity of 12.79%.

Shimano, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyota Motor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $230.64 which suggests that it could grow by 17.34%. Given that Toyota Motor Corp. has higher upside potential than Shimano, Inc., analysts believe Toyota Motor Corp. is more attractive than Shimano, Inc..

Shimano, Inc. has a beta of 0.550, which suggesting that the stock is 45.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyota Motor Corp. has a beta of 0.670, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.019%.

Shimano, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $1.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Toyota Motor Corp. offers a yield of 3.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.87 per share. Shimano, Inc. pays 36.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyota Motor Corp. pays out 22.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shimano, Inc. quarterly revenues are $770.4M, which are smaller than Toyota Motor Corp. quarterly revenues of $83.9B. Shimano, Inc.'s net income of $82.9M is lower than Toyota Motor Corp.'s net income of $6.6B. Notably, Shimano, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.84x while Toyota Motor Corp.'s PE ratio is 8.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimano, Inc. is 2.86x versus 0.77x for Toyota Motor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.