SDWL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of -- compared to Shengda Network Technology's net margin of 3.35%. Shengda Network Technology's return on equity of -- beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

Shengda Network Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 86.1%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Shengda Network Technology, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Shengda Network Technology.

Shengda Network Technology has a beta of 0.502, which suggesting that the stock is 49.818% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 135.155%.

Shengda Network Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Shengda Network Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shengda Network Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Shengda Network Technology's net income of -- is lower than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Shengda Network Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shengda Network Technology is 17.64x versus 0.20x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H World Group has a net margin of -- compared to Shengda Network Technology's net margin of 19.76%. Shengda Network Technology's return on equity of -- beat H World Group's return on equity of 29.15%.

Shengda Network Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand H World Group has an analysts' consensus of $44.55 which suggests that it could grow by 45.07%. Given that H World Group has higher upside potential than Shengda Network Technology, analysts believe H World Group is more attractive than Shengda Network Technology.

Shengda Network Technology has a beta of 0.502, which suggesting that the stock is 49.818% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group has a beta of 0.712, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.788%.

Shengda Network Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H World Group offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Shengda Network Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shengda Network Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than H World Group quarterly revenues of $899.7M. Shengda Network Technology's net income of -- is lower than H World Group's net income of $177.8M. Notably, Shengda Network Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while H World Group's PE ratio is 18.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shengda Network Technology is 17.64x versus 3.10x for H World Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kandi Technologies Group has a net margin of -- compared to Shengda Network Technology's net margin of -13.73%. Shengda Network Technology's return on equity of -- beat Kandi Technologies Group's return on equity of -1.54%.

Shengda Network Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 346.43%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group has higher upside potential than Shengda Network Technology, analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group is more attractive than Shengda Network Technology.

Shengda Network Technology has a beta of 0.502, which suggesting that the stock is 49.818% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group has a beta of 1.373, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.293%.

Shengda Network Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kandi Technologies Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shengda Network Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shengda Network Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kandi Technologies Group quarterly revenues of $29.9M. Shengda Network Technology's net income of -- is lower than Kandi Technologies Group's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Shengda Network Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kandi Technologies Group's PE ratio is 58.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shengda Network Technology is 17.64x versus 0.71x for Kandi Technologies Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trip.com Group has a net margin of -- compared to Shengda Network Technology's net margin of 42.62%. Shengda Network Technology's return on equity of -- beat Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.5%.

Shengda Network Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Trip.com Group has an analysts' consensus of $76.04 which suggests that it could grow by 16.7%. Given that Trip.com Group has higher upside potential than Shengda Network Technology, analysts believe Trip.com Group is more attractive than Shengda Network Technology.

Shengda Network Technology has a beta of 0.502, which suggesting that the stock is 49.818% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.373, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.678%.

Shengda Network Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trip.com Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shengda Network Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trip.com Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shengda Network Technology quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Trip.com Group quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Shengda Network Technology's net income of -- is lower than Trip.com Group's net income of $944.8M. Notably, Shengda Network Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trip.com Group's PE ratio is 19.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shengda Network Technology is 17.64x versus 6.25x for Trip.com Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.