SAFS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coda Octopus Group has a net margin of -- compared to Safer Shot's net margin of 23.28%. Safer Shot's return on equity of -- beat Coda Octopus Group's return on equity of 5.94%.

Safer Shot has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Coda Octopus Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.18%. Given that Coda Octopus Group has higher upside potential than Safer Shot, analysts believe Coda Octopus Group is more attractive than Safer Shot.

Safer Shot has a beta of -88.091, which suggesting that the stock is 8909.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coda Octopus Group has a beta of 0.573, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.691%.

Safer Shot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coda Octopus Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Safer Shot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coda Octopus Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Safer Shot quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Coda Octopus Group quarterly revenues of $5.5M. Safer Shot's net income of -- is lower than Coda Octopus Group's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Safer Shot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Coda Octopus Group's PE ratio is 31.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safer Shot is -- versus 5.10x for Coda Octopus Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingersoll Rand has a net margin of -- compared to Safer Shot's net margin of 11.91%. Safer Shot's return on equity of -- beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.43%.

Safer Shot has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ingersoll Rand has an analysts' consensus of $106.89 which suggests that it could grow by 19.89%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Safer Shot, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Safer Shot.

Safer Shot has a beta of -88.091, which suggesting that the stock is 8909.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.438, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.804%.

Safer Shot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ingersoll Rand offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Safer Shot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand pays out 4.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Safer Shot quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Safer Shot's net income of -- is lower than Ingersoll Rand's net income of $221.6M. Notably, Safer Shot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ingersoll Rand's PE ratio is 43.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safer Shot is -- versus 5.08x for Ingersoll Rand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tel Instrument Electronics has a net margin of -- compared to Safer Shot's net margin of -45.83%. Safer Shot's return on equity of -- beat Tel Instrument Electronics's return on equity of -4.44%.

Safer Shot has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tel Instrument Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Safer Shot has higher upside potential than Tel Instrument Electronics, analysts believe Safer Shot is more attractive than Tel Instrument Electronics.

Safer Shot has a beta of -88.091, which suggesting that the stock is 8909.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tel Instrument Electronics has a beta of 0.499, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.061%.

Safer Shot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tel Instrument Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Safer Shot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tel Instrument Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Safer Shot quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tel Instrument Electronics quarterly revenues of $1.8M. Safer Shot's net income of -- is lower than Tel Instrument Electronics's net income of -$814.6K. Notably, Safer Shot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tel Instrument Electronics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safer Shot is -- versus 1.25x for Tel Instrument Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Safer Shot's net margin of 12.71%. Safer Shot's return on equity of -- beat Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 17.85%.

Safer Shot has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Watts Water Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $210.33 which suggests that it could grow by 5.13%. Given that Watts Water Technologies has higher upside potential than Safer Shot, analysts believe Watts Water Technologies is more attractive than Safer Shot.

Safer Shot has a beta of -88.091, which suggesting that the stock is 8909.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 0.934, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.626%.

Safer Shot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Watts Water Technologies offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Safer Shot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 17.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Safer Shot quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues of $543.6M. Safer Shot's net income of -- is lower than Watts Water Technologies's net income of $69.1M. Notably, Safer Shot's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Watts Water Technologies's PE ratio is 23.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safer Shot is -- versus 2.97x for Watts Water Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.