CLIR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ingersoll Rand has a net margin of -62.13% compared to ClearSign Technologies's net margin of 11.91%. ClearSign Technologies's return on equity of -54.96% beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.43%.

ClearSign Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 354.55%. On the other hand Ingersoll Rand has an analysts' consensus of $107.19 which suggests that it could grow by 17.44%. Given that ClearSign Technologies has higher upside potential than Ingersoll Rand, analysts believe ClearSign Technologies is more attractive than Ingersoll Rand.

ClearSign Technologies has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.039% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.438, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.804%.

ClearSign Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ingersoll Rand offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. ClearSign Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand pays out 4.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ClearSign Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues of $1.9B. ClearSign Technologies's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Ingersoll Rand's net income of $221.6M. Notably, ClearSign Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ingersoll Rand's PE ratio is 44.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ClearSign Technologies is 13.84x versus 5.20x for Ingersoll Rand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safer Shot has a net margin of -62.13% compared to ClearSign Technologies's net margin of --. ClearSign Technologies's return on equity of -54.96% beat Safer Shot's return on equity of --.

ClearSign Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 354.55%. On the other hand Safer Shot has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ClearSign Technologies has higher upside potential than Safer Shot, analysts believe ClearSign Technologies is more attractive than Safer Shot.

ClearSign Technologies has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.039% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safer Shot has a beta of -88.091, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8909.061%.

ClearSign Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safer Shot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ClearSign Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safer Shot pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ClearSign Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are larger than Safer Shot quarterly revenues of --. ClearSign Technologies's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Safer Shot's net income of --. Notably, ClearSign Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Safer Shot's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ClearSign Technologies is 13.84x versus -- for Safer Shot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tel Instrument Electronics has a net margin of -62.13% compared to ClearSign Technologies's net margin of -45.83%. ClearSign Technologies's return on equity of -54.96% beat Tel Instrument Electronics's return on equity of -4.44%.

ClearSign Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 354.55%. On the other hand Tel Instrument Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ClearSign Technologies has higher upside potential than Tel Instrument Electronics, analysts believe ClearSign Technologies is more attractive than Tel Instrument Electronics.

ClearSign Technologies has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.039% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tel Instrument Electronics has a beta of 0.499, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.061%.

ClearSign Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tel Instrument Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ClearSign Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tel Instrument Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ClearSign Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are larger than Tel Instrument Electronics quarterly revenues of $1.8M. ClearSign Technologies's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Tel Instrument Electronics's net income of -$814.6K. Notably, ClearSign Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tel Instrument Electronics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ClearSign Technologies is 13.84x versus 1.25x for Tel Instrument Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of -62.13% compared to ClearSign Technologies's net margin of 12.71%. ClearSign Technologies's return on equity of -54.96% beat Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 17.85%.

ClearSign Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 354.55%. On the other hand Watts Water Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $210.33 which suggests that it could grow by 4.13%. Given that ClearSign Technologies has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe ClearSign Technologies is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

ClearSign Technologies has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.039% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 0.934, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.626%.

ClearSign Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Watts Water Technologies offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. ClearSign Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 17.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ClearSign Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues of $543.6M. ClearSign Technologies's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Watts Water Technologies's net income of $69.1M. Notably, ClearSign Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Watts Water Technologies's PE ratio is 24.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ClearSign Technologies is 13.84x versus 3.00x for Watts Water Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.