Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
33
CLIR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.75
Seasonality move
:
-3.93%
Day range:
$0.75 - $0.77
52-week range:
$0.46 - $1.72
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
19.22x
P/B ratio:
4.49x
Volume:
25.7K
Avg. volume:
116K
1-year change:
-36.75%
Market cap:
$40.8M
Revenue:
$3.6M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.12
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLIR
ClearSign Technologies Corp.
|
$1.4M | -$0.04 | 311.02% | -29.31% | $2.00 |
|
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
|
$6.5M | -- | 29.06% | -- | $11.0000 |
|
IR
Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
|
$1.9B | $0.86 | 7.22% | 59.92% | $87.70 |
|
SAFS
Safer Shot, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TIKK
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
|
$605.8M | $2.59 | 12.7% | 15.59% | $292.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLIR
ClearSign Technologies Corp.
|
$0.77 | $2.00 | $40.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 19.22x |
|
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
|
$8.5900 | $11.0000 | $96.6M | 28.28x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.98x |
|
IR
Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
|
$79.86 | $87.70 | $31.6B | 59.24x | $0.02 | 0.1% | 4.32x |
|
SAFS
Safer Shot, Inc.
|
$0.0000 | -- | $1.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TIKK
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.
|
$3.85 | -- | $12.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.31x |
|
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
|
$272.66 | $292.50 | $9.1B | 28.14x | $0.52 | 0.73% | 3.88x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLIR
ClearSign Technologies Corp.
|
2% | 1.280 | 0.46% | 3.17x |
|
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
|
0.7% | 2.661 | 0.48% | 8.52x |
|
IR
Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
|
32.4% | 1.374 | 14.83% | 1.39x |
|
SAFS
Safer Shot, Inc.
|
-- | 127.871 | -- | -- |
|
TIKK
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.
|
16.57% | 2.111 | 7.01% | 0.47x |
|
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
|
9.17% | 1.179 | 2.12% | 1.71x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLIR
ClearSign Technologies Corp.
|
$368K | -$1.8M | -51.98% | -52.8% | -170.07% | -$1.9M |
|
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
|
$4.5M | $1.4M | 6.27% | 6.3% | 19.53% | $1.6M |
|
IR
Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
|
$760.3M | $398.6M | 3.64% | 5.36% | 20.39% | $325.5M |
|
SAFS
Safer Shot, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TIKK
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.
|
$634.4K | -$575K | -12.02% | -13.77% | -19.35% | -$84.6K |
|
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
|
$298.4M | $113.3M | 16.11% | 18% | 18.52% | $110.9M |
ClearSign Technologies Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CLIR or CODA?
Coda Octopus Group, Inc. has a net margin of -138.87% compared to ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s net margin of 18.16%. ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of -52.8% beat Coda Octopus Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.3%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLIRClearSign Technologies Corp.35.76% -$0.03 $9.3M CODACoda Octopus Group, Inc.63.07% $0.11 $57.7M -
What do Analysts Say About CLIR or CODA?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 161.34%. On the other hand Coda Octopus Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.0000 which suggests that it could grow by 28.06%. Given that ClearSign Technologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Coda Octopus Group, Inc., analysts believe ClearSign Technologies Corp. is more attractive than Coda Octopus Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLIRClearSign Technologies Corp.1 0 0 CODACoda Octopus Group, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is CLIR or CODA More Risky?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.647% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coda Octopus Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.614, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.611%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLIR or CODA?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coda Octopus Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ClearSign Technologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coda Octopus Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLIR or CODA?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $1M, which are smaller than Coda Octopus Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.1M. ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.4M is lower than Coda Octopus Group, Inc.'s net income of $1.3M. Notably, ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Coda Octopus Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ClearSign Technologies Corp. is 19.22x versus 3.98x for Coda Octopus Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLIRClearSign Technologies Corp.19.22x -- $1M -$1.4M CODACoda Octopus Group, Inc.3.98x 28.28x $7.1M $1.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns CLIR or IR?
Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has a net margin of -138.87% compared to ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s net margin of 12.57%. ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of -52.8% beat Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.36%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLIRClearSign Technologies Corp.35.76% -$0.03 $9.3M IRIngersoll Rand, Inc.38.89% $0.61 $15B -
What do Analysts Say About CLIR or IR?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 161.34%. On the other hand Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $87.70 which suggests that it could grow by 9.82%. Given that ClearSign Technologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Ingersoll Rand, Inc., analysts believe ClearSign Technologies Corp. is more attractive than Ingersoll Rand, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLIRClearSign Technologies Corp.1 0 0 IRIngersoll Rand, Inc.7 8 0 -
Is CLIR or IR More Risky?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.647% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has a beta of 1.326, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.648%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLIR or IR?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ingersoll Rand, Inc. offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. ClearSign Technologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand, Inc. pays out 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLIR or IR?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $1M, which are smaller than Ingersoll Rand, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2B. ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.4M is lower than Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s net income of $245.8M. Notably, ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s PE ratio is 59.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ClearSign Technologies Corp. is 19.22x versus 4.32x for Ingersoll Rand, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLIRClearSign Technologies Corp.19.22x -- $1M -$1.4M IRIngersoll Rand, Inc.4.32x 59.24x $2B $245.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns CLIR or SAFS?
Safer Shot, Inc. has a net margin of -138.87% compared to ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s net margin of --. ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of -52.8% beat Safer Shot, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLIRClearSign Technologies Corp.35.76% -$0.03 $9.3M SAFSSafer Shot, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CLIR or SAFS?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 161.34%. On the other hand Safer Shot, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ClearSign Technologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Safer Shot, Inc., analysts believe ClearSign Technologies Corp. is more attractive than Safer Shot, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLIRClearSign Technologies Corp.1 0 0 SAFSSafer Shot, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CLIR or SAFS More Risky?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.647% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safer Shot, Inc. has a beta of -17.215, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1821.521%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLIR or SAFS?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safer Shot, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ClearSign Technologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safer Shot, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLIR or SAFS?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $1M, which are larger than Safer Shot, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.4M is higher than Safer Shot, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Safer Shot, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ClearSign Technologies Corp. is 19.22x versus -- for Safer Shot, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLIRClearSign Technologies Corp.19.22x -- $1M -$1.4M SAFSSafer Shot, Inc.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLIR or TIKK?
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp. has a net margin of -138.87% compared to ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s net margin of -15.36%. ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of -52.8% beat Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.'s return on equity of -13.77%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLIRClearSign Technologies Corp.35.76% -$0.03 $9.3M TIKKTel-Instrument Electronics Corp.21.35% -$0.17 $6.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CLIR or TIKK?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 161.34%. On the other hand Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ClearSign Technologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp., analysts believe ClearSign Technologies Corp. is more attractive than Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLIRClearSign Technologies Corp.1 0 0 TIKKTel-Instrument Electronics Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CLIR or TIKK More Risky?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.647% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp. has a beta of 0.891, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.91%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLIR or TIKK?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ClearSign Technologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLIR or TIKK?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $1M, which are smaller than Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp. quarterly revenues of $3M. ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.4M is lower than Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.'s net income of -$456.5K. Notably, ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ClearSign Technologies Corp. is 19.22x versus 1.31x for Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLIRClearSign Technologies Corp.19.22x -- $1M -$1.4M TIKKTel-Instrument Electronics Corp.1.31x -- $3M -$456.5K
-
Which has Higher Returns CLIR or WTS?
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -138.87% compared to ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s net margin of 13.44%. ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of -52.8% beat Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 18%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLIRClearSign Technologies Corp.35.76% -$0.03 $9.3M WTSWatts Water Technologies, Inc.48.78% $2.45 $2.2B -
What do Analysts Say About CLIR or WTS?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 161.34%. On the other hand Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $292.50 which suggests that it could grow by 7.28%. Given that ClearSign Technologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, Inc., analysts believe ClearSign Technologies Corp. is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLIRClearSign Technologies Corp.1 0 0 WTSWatts Water Technologies, Inc.1 9 0 -
Is CLIR or WTS More Risky?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.647% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.233, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.343%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLIR or WTS?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Watts Water Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. ClearSign Technologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies, Inc. pays out 18.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLIR or WTS?
ClearSign Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $1M, which are smaller than Watts Water Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $611.7M. ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.4M is lower than Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $82.2M. Notably, ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ClearSign Technologies Corp. is 19.22x versus 3.88x for Watts Water Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLIRClearSign Technologies Corp.19.22x -- $1M -$1.4M WTSWatts Water Technologies, Inc.3.88x 28.14x $611.7M $82.2M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
50
TGL alert for Dec 8
Treasure Global, Inc. [TGL] is up 31.68% over the past day.
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 45.78% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 8.15% over the past day.
