Financhill
Buy
66

IR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$81.26
Seasonality move :
0.92%
Day range:
$80.88 - $81.72
52-week range:
$65.61 - $95.85
Dividend yield:
0.1%
P/E ratio:
60.30x
P/S ratio:
4.39x
P/B ratio:
3.17x
Volume:
900.4K
Avg. volume:
2.7M
1-year change:
-11.92%
Market cap:
$32.1B
Revenue:
$7.2B
EPS (TTM):
$1.35

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
IR
Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
$1.9B $0.78 7.28% 59.8% $88.30
CLIR
ClearSign Technologies Corp.
$1.4M -$0.04 311.02% -29.31% $2.00
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
$6.2M -- 29.06% -- $11.0000
FLS
Flowserve Corp.
$1.2B $0.87 6.94% 62.11% $78.20
TIKK
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.
-- -- -- -- --
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
$609.5M $2.62 12.77% 15.26% $293.57
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
IR
Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
$81.28 $88.30 $32.1B 60.30x $0.02 0.1% 4.39x
CLIR
ClearSign Technologies Corp.
$0.61 $2.00 $32.4M -- $0.00 0% 15.29x
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
$9.3600 $11.0000 $105.3M 30.82x $0.00 0% 4.34x
FLS
Flowserve Corp.
$71.03 $78.20 $9B 20.67x $0.21 1.18% 2.00x
TIKK
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.
$1.50 -- $4.9M -- $0.00 0% 0.51x
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
$284.26 $293.57 $9.5B 29.34x $0.52 0.7% 4.05x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
IR
Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
32.4% 1.374 14.83% 1.39x
CLIR
ClearSign Technologies Corp.
2% 1.280 0.46% 3.17x
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
0.7% 2.661 0.48% 8.52x
FLS
Flowserve Corp.
42.47% 2.077 24.36% 1.54x
TIKK
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.
16.57% 2.111 7.01% 0.47x
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
9.17% 1.179 2.12% 1.71x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
IR
Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
$760.3M $398.6M 3.64% 5.36% 20.39% $325.5M
CLIR
ClearSign Technologies Corp.
$368K -$1.8M -51.98% -52.8% -170.07% -$1.9M
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
$4.5M $1.4M 6.27% 6.3% 19.53% $1.6M
FLS
Flowserve Corp.
$405.8M $105.2M 12.48% 21.81% 8.96% $384.7M
TIKK
Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.
$634.4K -$575K -12.02% -13.77% -19.35% -$84.6K
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
$298.4M $113.3M 16.11% 18% 18.52% $110.9M

Ingersoll Rand, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns IR or CLIR?

    ClearSign Technologies Corp. has a net margin of 12.57% compared to Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s net margin of -138.87%. Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.36% beat ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of -52.8%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IR
    Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
    38.89% $0.61 $15B
    CLIR
    ClearSign Technologies Corp.
    35.76% -$0.03 $9.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About IR or CLIR?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $88.30, signalling upside risk potential of 8.64%. On the other hand ClearSign Technologies Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 228.52%. Given that ClearSign Technologies Corp. has higher upside potential than Ingersoll Rand, Inc., analysts believe ClearSign Technologies Corp. is more attractive than Ingersoll Rand, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IR
    Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
    7 8 0
    CLIR
    ClearSign Technologies Corp.
    1 0 0
  • Is IR or CLIR More Risky?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has a beta of 1.326, which suggesting that the stock is 32.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ClearSign Technologies Corp. has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.647%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IR or CLIR?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. ClearSign Technologies Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ingersoll Rand, Inc. pays 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. ClearSign Technologies Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IR or CLIR?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than ClearSign Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues of $1M. Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s net income of $245.8M is higher than ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 60.30x while ClearSign Technologies Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingersoll Rand, Inc. is 4.39x versus 15.29x for ClearSign Technologies Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IR
    Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
    4.39x 60.30x $2B $245.8M
    CLIR
    ClearSign Technologies Corp.
    15.29x -- $1M -$1.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns IR or CODA?

    Coda Octopus Group, Inc. has a net margin of 12.57% compared to Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s net margin of 18.16%. Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.36% beat Coda Octopus Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.3%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IR
    Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
    38.89% $0.61 $15B
    CODA
    Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
    63.07% $0.11 $57.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About IR or CODA?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $88.30, signalling upside risk potential of 8.64%. On the other hand Coda Octopus Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.0000 which suggests that it could grow by 17.52%. Given that Coda Octopus Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ingersoll Rand, Inc., analysts believe Coda Octopus Group, Inc. is more attractive than Ingersoll Rand, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IR
    Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
    7 8 0
    CODA
    Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
    1 0 0
  • Is IR or CODA More Risky?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has a beta of 1.326, which suggesting that the stock is 32.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coda Octopus Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.614, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.611%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IR or CODA?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Coda Octopus Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ingersoll Rand, Inc. pays 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Coda Octopus Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IR or CODA?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Coda Octopus Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.1M. Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s net income of $245.8M is higher than Coda Octopus Group, Inc.'s net income of $1.3M. Notably, Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 60.30x while Coda Octopus Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingersoll Rand, Inc. is 4.39x versus 4.34x for Coda Octopus Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IR
    Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
    4.39x 60.30x $2B $245.8M
    CODA
    Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
    4.34x 30.82x $7.1M $1.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns IR or FLS?

    Flowserve Corp. has a net margin of 12.57% compared to Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s net margin of 19.06%. Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.36% beat Flowserve Corp.'s return on equity of 21.81%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IR
    Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
    38.89% $0.61 $15B
    FLS
    Flowserve Corp.
    34.55% $1.67 $4B
  • What do Analysts Say About IR or FLS?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $88.30, signalling upside risk potential of 8.64%. On the other hand Flowserve Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $78.20 which suggests that it could grow by 10.09%. Given that Flowserve Corp. has higher upside potential than Ingersoll Rand, Inc., analysts believe Flowserve Corp. is more attractive than Ingersoll Rand, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IR
    Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
    7 8 0
    FLS
    Flowserve Corp.
    7 3 0
  • Is IR or FLS More Risky?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has a beta of 1.326, which suggesting that the stock is 32.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowserve Corp. has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.016%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IR or FLS?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Flowserve Corp. offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Ingersoll Rand, Inc. pays 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve Corp. pays out 39.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IR or FLS?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Flowserve Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s net income of $245.8M is higher than Flowserve Corp.'s net income of $223.9M. Notably, Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 60.30x while Flowserve Corp.'s PE ratio is 20.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingersoll Rand, Inc. is 4.39x versus 2.00x for Flowserve Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IR
    Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
    4.39x 60.30x $2B $245.8M
    FLS
    Flowserve Corp.
    2.00x 20.67x $1.2B $223.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns IR or TIKK?

    Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp. has a net margin of 12.57% compared to Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s net margin of -15.36%. Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.36% beat Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.'s return on equity of -13.77%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IR
    Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
    38.89% $0.61 $15B
    TIKK
    Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.
    21.35% -$0.17 $6.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About IR or TIKK?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $88.30, signalling upside risk potential of 8.64%. On the other hand Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has higher upside potential than Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp., analysts believe Ingersoll Rand, Inc. is more attractive than Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IR
    Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
    7 8 0
    TIKK
    Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.
    0 0 0
  • Is IR or TIKK More Risky?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has a beta of 1.326, which suggesting that the stock is 32.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp. has a beta of 0.891, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.91%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IR or TIKK?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ingersoll Rand, Inc. pays 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IR or TIKK?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp. quarterly revenues of $3M. Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s net income of $245.8M is higher than Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.'s net income of -$456.5K. Notably, Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 60.30x while Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingersoll Rand, Inc. is 4.39x versus 0.51x for Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IR
    Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
    4.39x 60.30x $2B $245.8M
    TIKK
    Tel-Instrument Electronics Corp.
    0.51x -- $3M -$456.5K
  • Which has Higher Returns IR or WTS?

    Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 12.57% compared to Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s net margin of 13.44%. Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.36% beat Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 18%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IR
    Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
    38.89% $0.61 $15B
    WTS
    Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
    48.78% $2.45 $2.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About IR or WTS?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has a consensus price target of $88.30, signalling upside risk potential of 8.64%. On the other hand Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $293.57 which suggests that it could grow by 3.28%. Given that Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Ingersoll Rand, Inc. is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IR
    Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
    7 8 0
    WTS
    Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
    1 10 0
  • Is IR or WTS More Risky?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has a beta of 1.326, which suggesting that the stock is 32.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.233, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.343%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IR or WTS?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Watts Water Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Ingersoll Rand, Inc. pays 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies, Inc. pays out 18.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IR or WTS?

    Ingersoll Rand, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Watts Water Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $611.7M. Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s net income of $245.8M is higher than Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $82.2M. Notably, Ingersoll Rand, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 60.30x while Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingersoll Rand, Inc. is 4.39x versus 4.05x for Watts Water Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IR
    Ingersoll Rand, Inc.
    4.39x 60.30x $2B $245.8M
    WTS
    Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
    4.05x 29.34x $611.7M $82.2M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?

Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…

Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?

Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…

Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?

Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27

Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.

Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.

Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27

Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock