Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
67
RTNTF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$116.23
Seasonality move
:
-0.37%
Day range:
$116.23 - $116.23
52-week range:
$60.79 - $118.09
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
19.10x
P/S ratio:
3.30x
P/B ratio:
4.31x
Volume:
65
Avg. volume:
1.2K
1-year change:
54.36%
Market cap:
$188.9B
Revenue:
$57.6B
EPS (TTM):
$6.08
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RTNTF
Rio Tinto Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RTNTF
Rio Tinto Ltd.
|
$116.23 | -- | $188.9B | 19.10x | $2.35 | 0% | 3.30x |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
$0.0070 | -- | $2.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.25x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
$0.06 | -- | $29.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 13.60x |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
$0.35 | -- | $93M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 208.61x |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
$1.52 | -- | $581.8M | 101.84x | $0.03 | 0% | 0.26x |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
$0.06 | -- | $20.4M | 47.38x | $0.01 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RTNTF
Rio Tinto Ltd.
|
27.46% | -0.525 | -- | 1.03x |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
9.38% | 0.000 | -- | 1.16x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
38.76% | -0.121 | 18.45% | 0.44x |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
-- | 0.324 | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
44.7% | -3.351 | -- | 1.20x |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -0.421 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RTNTF
Rio Tinto Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 13.73% | 17.4% | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -24.73% | -26.41% | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -33.72% | -45.85% | -- | -- |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.75% | -1.2% | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Rio Tinto Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns RTNTF or FTZZF?
Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Rio Tinto Ltd.'s net margin of --. Rio Tinto Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.4% beat Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s return on equity of -26.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RTNTFRio Tinto Ltd.-- -- $84B FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.-- -- $7.3M -
What do Analysts Say About RTNTF or FTZZF?
Rio Tinto Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rio Tinto Ltd. has higher upside potential than Canadian Phosphate Ltd., analysts believe Rio Tinto Ltd. is more attractive than Canadian Phosphate Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RTNTFRio Tinto Ltd.0 0 0 FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RTNTF or FTZZF More Risky?
Rio Tinto Ltd. has a beta of 0.264, which suggesting that the stock is 73.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has a beta of -0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 189.253%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RTNTF or FTZZF?
Rio Tinto Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $2.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canadian Phosphate Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rio Tinto Ltd. pays 63.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Phosphate Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RTNTF or FTZZF?
Rio Tinto Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Canadian Phosphate Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Rio Tinto Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Rio Tinto Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.10x while Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rio Tinto Ltd. is 3.30x versus 1.25x for Canadian Phosphate Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RTNTFRio Tinto Ltd.3.30x 19.10x -- -- FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.1.25x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RTNTF or HMIFF?
Harvest Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Rio Tinto Ltd.'s net margin of --. Rio Tinto Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.4% beat Harvest Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -45.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RTNTFRio Tinto Ltd.-- -- $84B HMIFFHarvest Minerals Ltd.-- -- $5.2M -
What do Analysts Say About RTNTF or HMIFF?
Rio Tinto Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvest Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rio Tinto Ltd. has higher upside potential than Harvest Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Rio Tinto Ltd. is more attractive than Harvest Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RTNTFRio Tinto Ltd.0 0 0 HMIFFHarvest Minerals Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RTNTF or HMIFF More Risky?
Rio Tinto Ltd. has a beta of 0.264, which suggesting that the stock is 73.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvest Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RTNTF or HMIFF?
Rio Tinto Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $2.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harvest Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rio Tinto Ltd. pays 63.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvest Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RTNTF or HMIFF?
Rio Tinto Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvest Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Rio Tinto Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Harvest Minerals Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Rio Tinto Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.10x while Harvest Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rio Tinto Ltd. is 3.30x versus 13.60x for Harvest Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RTNTFRio Tinto Ltd.3.30x 19.10x -- -- HMIFFHarvest Minerals Ltd.13.60x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RTNTF or HZRGF?
Hazer Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Rio Tinto Ltd.'s net margin of --. Rio Tinto Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.4% beat Hazer Group Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RTNTFRio Tinto Ltd.-- -- $84B HZRGFHazer Group Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RTNTF or HZRGF?
Rio Tinto Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hazer Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rio Tinto Ltd. has higher upside potential than Hazer Group Ltd., analysts believe Rio Tinto Ltd. is more attractive than Hazer Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RTNTFRio Tinto Ltd.0 0 0 HZRGFHazer Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RTNTF or HZRGF More Risky?
Rio Tinto Ltd. has a beta of 0.264, which suggesting that the stock is 73.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hazer Group Ltd. has a beta of 77.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7620.487%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RTNTF or HZRGF?
Rio Tinto Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $2.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hazer Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rio Tinto Ltd. pays 63.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Hazer Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RTNTF or HZRGF?
Rio Tinto Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hazer Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Rio Tinto Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Hazer Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Rio Tinto Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.10x while Hazer Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rio Tinto Ltd. is 3.30x versus 208.61x for Hazer Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RTNTFRio Tinto Ltd.3.30x 19.10x -- -- HZRGFHazer Group Ltd.208.61x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RTNTF or NUFMF?
Nufarm Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Rio Tinto Ltd.'s net margin of --. Rio Tinto Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.4% beat Nufarm Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RTNTFRio Tinto Ltd.-- -- $84B NUFMFNufarm Ltd.-- -- $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About RTNTF or NUFMF?
Rio Tinto Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nufarm Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rio Tinto Ltd. has higher upside potential than Nufarm Ltd., analysts believe Rio Tinto Ltd. is more attractive than Nufarm Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RTNTFRio Tinto Ltd.0 0 0 NUFMFNufarm Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RTNTF or NUFMF More Risky?
Rio Tinto Ltd. has a beta of 0.264, which suggesting that the stock is 73.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nufarm Ltd. has a beta of -0.256, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 125.57%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RTNTF or NUFMF?
Rio Tinto Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $2.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nufarm Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Rio Tinto Ltd. pays 63.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Nufarm Ltd. pays out 951.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Nufarm Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RTNTF or NUFMF?
Rio Tinto Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nufarm Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Rio Tinto Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Nufarm Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Rio Tinto Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.10x while Nufarm Ltd.'s PE ratio is 101.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rio Tinto Ltd. is 3.30x versus 0.26x for Nufarm Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RTNTFRio Tinto Ltd.3.30x 19.10x -- -- NUFMFNufarm Ltd.0.26x 101.84x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RTNTF or SBMSF?
Danakali Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Rio Tinto Ltd.'s net margin of --. Rio Tinto Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.4% beat Danakali Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RTNTFRio Tinto Ltd.-- -- $84B SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RTNTF or SBMSF?
Rio Tinto Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Danakali Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rio Tinto Ltd. has higher upside potential than Danakali Ltd., analysts believe Rio Tinto Ltd. is more attractive than Danakali Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RTNTFRio Tinto Ltd.0 0 0 SBMSFDanakali Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RTNTF or SBMSF More Risky?
Rio Tinto Ltd. has a beta of 0.264, which suggesting that the stock is 73.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danakali Ltd. has a beta of 1.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.229%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RTNTF or SBMSF?
Rio Tinto Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $2.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Danakali Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Rio Tinto Ltd. pays 63.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Danakali Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RTNTF or SBMSF?
Rio Tinto Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Danakali Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Rio Tinto Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Danakali Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Rio Tinto Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 19.10x while Danakali Ltd.'s PE ratio is 47.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rio Tinto Ltd. is 3.30x versus -- for Danakali Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RTNTFRio Tinto Ltd.3.30x 19.10x -- -- SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- 47.38x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
