Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
44
RSGUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$4.31
Seasonality move
:
4%
Day range:
$4.31 - $4.31
52-week range:
$3.68 - $4.68
Dividend yield:
6%
P/E ratio:
13.76x
P/S ratio:
0.69x
P/B ratio:
1.68x
Volume:
300
Avg. volume:
35.3K
1-year change:
3.07%
Market cap:
$552.8M
Revenue:
$938.7M
EPS (TTM):
$0.31
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RSGUF
Rogers Sugar, Inc.
|
$229.1M | -- | -10.21% | -- | -- |
|
ACU
Acme United Corp.
|
$48.8M | -- | 2.89% | -- | $50.00 |
|
BHST
BioHarvest Sciences, Inc.
|
$9.1M | -$0.12 | 25.84% | -43.34% | $13.6667 |
|
BRLS
Borealis Foods, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PFAI
Pinnacle Food Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNDL
SNDL, Inc.
|
$176.3M | -- | 1.12% | -- | $4.79 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RSGUF
Rogers Sugar, Inc.
|
$4.31 | -- | $552.8M | 13.76x | $0.07 | 6% | 0.69x |
|
ACU
Acme United Corp.
|
$40.58 | $50.00 | $154.5M | 16.68x | $0.16 | 1.53% | 0.86x |
|
BHST
BioHarvest Sciences, Inc.
|
$5.3300 | $13.6667 | $120.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.83x |
|
BRLS
Borealis Foods, Inc.
|
$1.62 | -- | $34.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.24x |
|
PFAI
Pinnacle Food Group Ltd.
|
$2.07 | -- | $24.2M | 63.38x | $0.00 | 0% | 5.51x |
|
SNDL
SNDL, Inc.
|
$1.73 | $4.79 | $445.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.66x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RSGUF
Rogers Sugar, Inc.
|
45.82% | 0.085 | 47.36% | 0.49x |
|
ACU
Acme United Corp.
|
23.51% | 0.389 | 22.7% | 1.61x |
|
BHST
BioHarvest Sciences, Inc.
|
71.95% | -1.007 | 10.75% | 0.94x |
|
BRLS
Borealis Foods, Inc.
|
159.75% | -1.290 | 59.9% | 0.05x |
|
PFAI
Pinnacle Food Group Ltd.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SNDL
SNDL, Inc.
|
12.37% | 0.859 | 16.16% | 3.35x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RSGUF
Rogers Sugar, Inc.
|
$33.6M | $20.4M | 7.57% | 14.61% | 8.03% | -$6.7M |
|
ACU
Acme United Corp.
|
$19.2M | $3M | 6.9% | 9.09% | 6.13% | $301K |
|
BHST
BioHarvest Sciences, Inc.
|
$5.6M | -$920K | -60.26% | -733.31% | -10.15% | -$2.5M |
|
BRLS
Borealis Foods, Inc.
|
$1M | -$1.9M | -65.51% | -34641.89% | -27.1% | -$122.9K |
|
PFAI
Pinnacle Food Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNDL
SNDL, Inc.
|
$37.2M | -$6.8M | -7.18% | -8.15% | -3.84% | $19.6M |
Rogers Sugar, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns RSGUF or ACU?
Acme United Corp. has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s net margin of 3.88%. Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.61% beat Acme United Corp.'s return on equity of 9.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RSGUFRogers Sugar, Inc.13.23% $0.07 $608.2M ACUAcme United Corp.39.12% $0.46 $151.4M -
What do Analysts Say About RSGUF or ACU?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Acme United Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.21%. Given that Acme United Corp. has higher upside potential than Rogers Sugar, Inc., analysts believe Acme United Corp. is more attractive than Rogers Sugar, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RSGUFRogers Sugar, Inc.0 0 0 ACUAcme United Corp.1 0 0 -
Is RSGUF or ACU More Risky?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.846% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acme United Corp. has a beta of 0.713, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.733%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RSGUF or ACU?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 6%. Acme United Corp. offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Rogers Sugar, Inc. pays 71.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Acme United Corp. pays out 24.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RSGUF or ACU?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. quarterly revenues are $253.7M, which are larger than Acme United Corp. quarterly revenues of $49.1M. Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s net income of $9.9M is higher than Acme United Corp.'s net income of $1.9M. Notably, Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.76x while Acme United Corp.'s PE ratio is 16.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rogers Sugar, Inc. is 0.69x versus 0.86x for Acme United Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RSGUFRogers Sugar, Inc.0.69x 13.76x $253.7M $9.9M ACUAcme United Corp.0.86x 16.68x $49.1M $1.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns RSGUF or BHST?
BioHarvest Sciences, Inc. has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s net margin of -27.72%. Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.61% beat BioHarvest Sciences, Inc.'s return on equity of -733.31%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RSGUFRogers Sugar, Inc.13.23% $0.07 $608.2M BHSTBioHarvest Sciences, Inc.61.43% -$0.14 $27.6M -
What do Analysts Say About RSGUF or BHST?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BioHarvest Sciences, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.6667 which suggests that it could grow by 156.41%. Given that BioHarvest Sciences, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rogers Sugar, Inc., analysts believe BioHarvest Sciences, Inc. is more attractive than Rogers Sugar, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RSGUFRogers Sugar, Inc.0 0 0 BHSTBioHarvest Sciences, Inc.2 0 0 -
Is RSGUF or BHST More Risky?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.846% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BioHarvest Sciences, Inc. has a beta of 1.176, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.565%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RSGUF or BHST?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 6%. BioHarvest Sciences, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rogers Sugar, Inc. pays 71.52% of its earnings as a dividend. BioHarvest Sciences, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RSGUF or BHST?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. quarterly revenues are $253.7M, which are larger than BioHarvest Sciences, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.1M. Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s net income of $9.9M is higher than BioHarvest Sciences, Inc.'s net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.76x while BioHarvest Sciences, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rogers Sugar, Inc. is 0.69x versus 2.83x for BioHarvest Sciences, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RSGUFRogers Sugar, Inc.0.69x 13.76x $253.7M $9.9M BHSTBioHarvest Sciences, Inc.2.83x -- $9.1M -$2.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns RSGUF or BRLS?
Borealis Foods, Inc. has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s net margin of -53.22%. Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.61% beat Borealis Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of -34641.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RSGUFRogers Sugar, Inc.13.23% $0.07 $608.2M BRLSBorealis Foods, Inc.14.65% -$0.18 $21.7M -
What do Analysts Say About RSGUF or BRLS?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Borealis Foods, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rogers Sugar, Inc. has higher upside potential than Borealis Foods, Inc., analysts believe Rogers Sugar, Inc. is more attractive than Borealis Foods, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RSGUFRogers Sugar, Inc.0 0 0 BRLSBorealis Foods, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is RSGUF or BRLS More Risky?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.846% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Borealis Foods, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RSGUF or BRLS?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 6%. Borealis Foods, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rogers Sugar, Inc. pays 71.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Borealis Foods, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RSGUF or BRLS?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. quarterly revenues are $253.7M, which are larger than Borealis Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.1M. Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s net income of $9.9M is higher than Borealis Foods, Inc.'s net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.76x while Borealis Foods, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rogers Sugar, Inc. is 0.69x versus 1.24x for Borealis Foods, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RSGUFRogers Sugar, Inc.0.69x 13.76x $253.7M $9.9M BRLSBorealis Foods, Inc.1.24x -- $7.1M -$3.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns RSGUF or PFAI?
Pinnacle Food Group Ltd. has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s net margin of --. Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.61% beat Pinnacle Food Group Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RSGUFRogers Sugar, Inc.13.23% $0.07 $608.2M PFAIPinnacle Food Group Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RSGUF or PFAI?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pinnacle Food Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rogers Sugar, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pinnacle Food Group Ltd., analysts believe Rogers Sugar, Inc. is more attractive than Pinnacle Food Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RSGUFRogers Sugar, Inc.0 0 0 PFAIPinnacle Food Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RSGUF or PFAI More Risky?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.846% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pinnacle Food Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RSGUF or PFAI?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 6%. Pinnacle Food Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rogers Sugar, Inc. pays 71.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Pinnacle Food Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RSGUF or PFAI?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. quarterly revenues are $253.7M, which are larger than Pinnacle Food Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s net income of $9.9M is higher than Pinnacle Food Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.76x while Pinnacle Food Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 63.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rogers Sugar, Inc. is 0.69x versus 5.51x for Pinnacle Food Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RSGUFRogers Sugar, Inc.0.69x 13.76x $253.7M $9.9M PFAIPinnacle Food Group Ltd.5.51x 63.38x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RSGUF or SNDL?
SNDL, Inc. has a net margin of 3.91% compared to Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s net margin of -5.45%. Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.61% beat SNDL, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.15%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RSGUFRogers Sugar, Inc.13.23% $0.07 $608.2M SNDLSNDL, Inc.20.99% -$0.04 $901.6M -
What do Analysts Say About RSGUF or SNDL?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SNDL, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.79 which suggests that it could grow by 176.98%. Given that SNDL, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rogers Sugar, Inc., analysts believe SNDL, Inc. is more attractive than Rogers Sugar, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RSGUFRogers Sugar, Inc.0 0 0 SNDLSNDL, Inc.2 0 0 -
Is RSGUF or SNDL More Risky?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. has a beta of 0.592, which suggesting that the stock is 40.846% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SNDL, Inc. has a beta of 0.579, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.095%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RSGUF or SNDL?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 6%. SNDL, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rogers Sugar, Inc. pays 71.52% of its earnings as a dividend. SNDL, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RSGUF or SNDL?
Rogers Sugar, Inc. quarterly revenues are $253.7M, which are larger than SNDL, Inc. quarterly revenues of $177.3M. Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s net income of $9.9M is higher than SNDL, Inc.'s net income of -$9.7M. Notably, Rogers Sugar, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.76x while SNDL, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rogers Sugar, Inc. is 0.69x versus 0.66x for SNDL, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RSGUFRogers Sugar, Inc.0.69x 13.76x $253.7M $9.9M SNDLSNDL, Inc.0.66x -- $177.3M -$9.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
