ROSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LegalZoom.com, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to ROSINBOMB's net margin of 2.37%. ROSINBOMB's return on equity of -- beat LegalZoom.com, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.09%.

ROSINBOMB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LegalZoom.com, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.96 which suggests that it could grow by 74.41%. Given that LegalZoom.com, Inc. has higher upside potential than ROSINBOMB, analysts believe LegalZoom.com, Inc. is more attractive than ROSINBOMB.

ROSINBOMB has a beta of 1.521, which suggesting that the stock is 52.137% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LegalZoom.com, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ROSINBOMB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LegalZoom.com, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ROSINBOMB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LegalZoom.com, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ROSINBOMB quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LegalZoom.com, Inc. quarterly revenues of $190.2M. ROSINBOMB's net income of -$4.4K is lower than LegalZoom.com, Inc.'s net income of $4.5M. Notably, ROSINBOMB's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LegalZoom.com, Inc.'s PE ratio is 55.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ROSINBOMB is -- versus 1.71x for LegalZoom.com, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Team, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to ROSINBOMB's net margin of -5.09%. ROSINBOMB's return on equity of -- beat Team, Inc.'s return on equity of -9614.95%.

ROSINBOMB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Team, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 815.17%. Given that Team, Inc. has higher upside potential than ROSINBOMB, analysts believe Team, Inc. is more attractive than ROSINBOMB.

ROSINBOMB has a beta of 1.521, which suggesting that the stock is 52.137% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Team, Inc. has a beta of 1.128, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.81%.

ROSINBOMB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Team, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ROSINBOMB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Team, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ROSINBOMB quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Team, Inc. quarterly revenues of $225M. ROSINBOMB's net income of -$4.4K is higher than Team, Inc.'s net income of -$11.4M. Notably, ROSINBOMB's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Team, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ROSINBOMB is -- versus 0.07x for Team, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UL Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to ROSINBOMB's net margin of 13.54%. ROSINBOMB's return on equity of -- beat UL Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of 34.9%.

ROSINBOMB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand UL Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $90.19 which suggests that it could grow by 27.73%. Given that UL Solutions, Inc. has higher upside potential than ROSINBOMB, analysts believe UL Solutions, Inc. is more attractive than ROSINBOMB.

ROSINBOMB has a beta of 1.521, which suggesting that the stock is 52.137% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UL Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ROSINBOMB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UL Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. ROSINBOMB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UL Solutions, Inc. pays out 23.03% of its earnings as a dividend. UL Solutions, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ROSINBOMB quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than UL Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $783M. ROSINBOMB's net income of -$4.4K is lower than UL Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $106M. Notably, ROSINBOMB's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UL Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is 42.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ROSINBOMB is -- versus 4.76x for UL Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Woodbridge Liquidation Trust has a net margin of -- compared to ROSINBOMB's net margin of --. ROSINBOMB's return on equity of -- beat Woodbridge Liquidation Trust's return on equity of --.

ROSINBOMB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Woodbridge Liquidation Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ROSINBOMB has higher upside potential than Woodbridge Liquidation Trust, analysts believe ROSINBOMB is more attractive than Woodbridge Liquidation Trust.

ROSINBOMB has a beta of 1.521, which suggesting that the stock is 52.137% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Woodbridge Liquidation Trust has a beta of -0.846, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 184.606%.

ROSINBOMB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Woodbridge Liquidation Trust offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.18 per share. ROSINBOMB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodbridge Liquidation Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ROSINBOMB quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Woodbridge Liquidation Trust quarterly revenues of --. ROSINBOMB's net income of -$4.4K is higher than Woodbridge Liquidation Trust's net income of --. Notably, ROSINBOMB's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Woodbridge Liquidation Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ROSINBOMB is -- versus -- for Woodbridge Liquidation Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.