ROSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LegalZoom.com has a net margin of -- compared to Rosinbomb's net margin of 6.56%. Rosinbomb's return on equity of -- beat LegalZoom.com's return on equity of 20.24%.

Rosinbomb has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LegalZoom.com has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.17%. Given that LegalZoom.com has higher upside potential than Rosinbomb, analysts believe LegalZoom.com is more attractive than Rosinbomb.

Rosinbomb has a beta of 1.442, which suggesting that the stock is 44.222% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LegalZoom.com has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rosinbomb has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LegalZoom.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rosinbomb pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LegalZoom.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rosinbomb quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LegalZoom.com quarterly revenues of $168.6M. Rosinbomb's net income of -- is lower than LegalZoom.com's net income of $11.1M. Notably, Rosinbomb's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LegalZoom.com's PE ratio is 59.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rosinbomb is -- versus 2.14x for LegalZoom.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Team has a net margin of -- compared to Rosinbomb's net margin of -5.28%. Rosinbomb's return on equity of -- beat Team's return on equity of -152.04%.

Rosinbomb has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Team has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 771.31%. Given that Team has higher upside potential than Rosinbomb, analysts believe Team is more attractive than Rosinbomb.

Rosinbomb has a beta of 1.442, which suggesting that the stock is 44.222% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Team has a beta of 1.785, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.464%.

Rosinbomb has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Team offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rosinbomb pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Team pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rosinbomb quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Team quarterly revenues of $210.8M. Rosinbomb's net income of -- is lower than Team's net income of -$11.1M. Notably, Rosinbomb's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Team's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rosinbomb is -- versus 0.08x for Team. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verra Mobility has a net margin of -- compared to Rosinbomb's net margin of 15.4%. Rosinbomb's return on equity of -- beat Verra Mobility's return on equity of 22.99%.

Rosinbomb has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Verra Mobility has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.93%. Given that Verra Mobility has higher upside potential than Rosinbomb, analysts believe Verra Mobility is more attractive than Rosinbomb.

Rosinbomb has a beta of 1.442, which suggesting that the stock is 44.222% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verra Mobility has a beta of 1.229, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.947%.

Rosinbomb has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verra Mobility offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rosinbomb pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verra Mobility pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rosinbomb quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Verra Mobility quarterly revenues of $225.6M. Rosinbomb's net income of -- is lower than Verra Mobility's net income of $34.7M. Notably, Rosinbomb's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Verra Mobility's PE ratio is 40.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rosinbomb is -- versus 4.59x for Verra Mobility. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xometry has a net margin of -- compared to Rosinbomb's net margin of -7.2%. Rosinbomb's return on equity of -- beat Xometry's return on equity of -15.74%.

Rosinbomb has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xometry has an analysts' consensus of $33.70 which suggests that it could fall by -19.17%. Given that Xometry has higher upside potential than Rosinbomb, analysts believe Xometry is more attractive than Rosinbomb.

Rosinbomb has a beta of 1.442, which suggesting that the stock is 44.222% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xometry has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rosinbomb has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xometry offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rosinbomb pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xometry pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rosinbomb quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xometry quarterly revenues of $141.7M. Rosinbomb's net income of -- is lower than Xometry's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Rosinbomb's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xometry's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rosinbomb is -- versus 3.87x for Xometry. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.