LZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

JNS Holdings has a net margin of 7.95% compared to LegalZoom.com's net margin of --. LegalZoom.com's return on equity of 27.2% beat JNS Holdings's return on equity of --.

LegalZoom.com has a consensus price target of $9.86, signalling upside risk potential of 39.03%. On the other hand JNS Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LegalZoom.com has higher upside potential than JNS Holdings, analysts believe LegalZoom.com is more attractive than JNS Holdings.

LegalZoom.com has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JNS Holdings has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.283%.

LegalZoom.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JNS Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LegalZoom.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JNS Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LegalZoom.com quarterly revenues are $161.7M, which are larger than JNS Holdings quarterly revenues of --. LegalZoom.com's net income of $12.9M is higher than JNS Holdings's net income of --. Notably, LegalZoom.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.31x while JNS Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LegalZoom.com is 1.90x versus -- for JNS Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Team has a net margin of 7.95% compared to LegalZoom.com's net margin of -3.37%. LegalZoom.com's return on equity of 27.2% beat Team's return on equity of -165.8%.

LegalZoom.com has a consensus price target of $9.86, signalling upside risk potential of 39.03%. On the other hand Team has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 442.8%. Given that Team has higher upside potential than LegalZoom.com, analysts believe Team is more attractive than LegalZoom.com.

LegalZoom.com has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Team has a beta of 1.598, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.759%.

LegalZoom.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Team offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LegalZoom.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Team pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LegalZoom.com quarterly revenues are $161.7M, which are smaller than Team quarterly revenues of $213.3M. LegalZoom.com's net income of $12.9M is higher than Team's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, LegalZoom.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.31x while Team's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LegalZoom.com is 1.90x versus 0.12x for Team. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Woodbridge Liquidation Trust has a net margin of 7.95% compared to LegalZoom.com's net margin of --. LegalZoom.com's return on equity of 27.2% beat Woodbridge Liquidation Trust's return on equity of --.

LegalZoom.com has a consensus price target of $9.86, signalling upside risk potential of 39.03%. On the other hand Woodbridge Liquidation Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LegalZoom.com has higher upside potential than Woodbridge Liquidation Trust, analysts believe LegalZoom.com is more attractive than Woodbridge Liquidation Trust.

LegalZoom.com has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Woodbridge Liquidation Trust has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

LegalZoom.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Woodbridge Liquidation Trust offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.18 per share. LegalZoom.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodbridge Liquidation Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LegalZoom.com quarterly revenues are $161.7M, which are larger than Woodbridge Liquidation Trust quarterly revenues of --. LegalZoom.com's net income of $12.9M is higher than Woodbridge Liquidation Trust's net income of --. Notably, LegalZoom.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.31x while Woodbridge Liquidation Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LegalZoom.com is 1.90x versus -- for Woodbridge Liquidation Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xometry has a net margin of 7.95% compared to LegalZoom.com's net margin of -6.66%. LegalZoom.com's return on equity of 27.2% beat Xometry's return on equity of -15.74%.

LegalZoom.com has a consensus price target of $9.86, signalling upside risk potential of 39.03%. On the other hand Xometry has an analysts' consensus of $34.10 which suggests that it could grow by 58.53%. Given that Xometry has higher upside potential than LegalZoom.com, analysts believe Xometry is more attractive than LegalZoom.com.

LegalZoom.com has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xometry has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

LegalZoom.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xometry offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LegalZoom.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xometry pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LegalZoom.com quarterly revenues are $161.7M, which are larger than Xometry quarterly revenues of $148.5M. LegalZoom.com's net income of $12.9M is higher than Xometry's net income of -$9.9M. Notably, LegalZoom.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.31x while Xometry's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LegalZoom.com is 1.90x versus 1.94x for Xometry. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.