TISI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LegalZoom.com has a net margin of -3.37% compared to Team's net margin of 2.8%. Team's return on equity of -165.8% beat LegalZoom.com's return on equity of 26.65%.

Team has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 528.93%. On the other hand LegalZoom.com has an analysts' consensus of $9.43 which suggests that it could grow by 4.41%. Given that Team has higher upside potential than LegalZoom.com, analysts believe Team is more attractive than LegalZoom.com.

Team has a beta of 1.783, which suggesting that the stock is 78.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LegalZoom.com has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Team has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LegalZoom.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Team pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LegalZoom.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Team quarterly revenues are $213.3M, which are larger than LegalZoom.com quarterly revenues of $183.1M. Team's net income of -$7.2M is lower than LegalZoom.com's net income of $5.1M. Notably, Team's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LegalZoom.com's PE ratio is 53.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Team is 0.11x versus 2.35x for LegalZoom.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rosinbomb has a net margin of -3.37% compared to Team's net margin of --. Team's return on equity of -165.8% beat Rosinbomb's return on equity of --.

Team has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 528.93%. On the other hand Rosinbomb has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Team has higher upside potential than Rosinbomb, analysts believe Team is more attractive than Rosinbomb.

Team has a beta of 1.783, which suggesting that the stock is 78.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rosinbomb has a beta of 1.716, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.594%.

Team has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rosinbomb offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Team pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rosinbomb pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Team quarterly revenues are $213.3M, which are larger than Rosinbomb quarterly revenues of --. Team's net income of -$7.2M is higher than Rosinbomb's net income of --. Notably, Team's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rosinbomb's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Team is 0.11x versus -- for Rosinbomb. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UL Solutions has a net margin of -3.37% compared to Team's net margin of 9.5%. Team's return on equity of -165.8% beat UL Solutions's return on equity of 39.37%.

Team has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 528.93%. On the other hand UL Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $69.55 which suggests that it could fall by -0.88%. Given that Team has higher upside potential than UL Solutions, analysts believe Team is more attractive than UL Solutions.

Team has a beta of 1.783, which suggesting that the stock is 78.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UL Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Team has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UL Solutions offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Team pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UL Solutions pays out 30.68% of its earnings as a dividend. UL Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Team quarterly revenues are $213.3M, which are smaller than UL Solutions quarterly revenues of $705M. Team's net income of -$7.2M is lower than UL Solutions's net income of $67M. Notably, Team's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UL Solutions's PE ratio is 42.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Team is 0.11x versus 4.87x for UL Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xometry has a net margin of -3.37% compared to Team's net margin of -9.99%. Team's return on equity of -165.8% beat Xometry's return on equity of -15.45%.

Team has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 528.93%. On the other hand Xometry has an analysts' consensus of $34.44 which suggests that it could grow by 12.93%. Given that Team has higher upside potential than Xometry, analysts believe Team is more attractive than Xometry.

Team has a beta of 1.783, which suggesting that the stock is 78.333% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xometry has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Team has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xometry offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Team pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xometry pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Team quarterly revenues are $213.3M, which are larger than Xometry quarterly revenues of $151M. Team's net income of -$7.2M is higher than Xometry's net income of -$15.1M. Notably, Team's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xometry's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Team is 0.11x versus 2.63x for Xometry. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.