RNWEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crayon Group Holding ASA has a net margin of -155.62% compared to REC Silicon ASA's net margin of 4.75%. REC Silicon ASA's return on equity of -1132.18% beat Crayon Group Holding ASA's return on equity of 5.11%.

REC Silicon ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Crayon Group Holding ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that REC Silicon ASA has higher upside potential than Crayon Group Holding ASA, analysts believe REC Silicon ASA is more attractive than Crayon Group Holding ASA.

REC Silicon ASA has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crayon Group Holding ASA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

REC Silicon ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crayon Group Holding ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. REC Silicon ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crayon Group Holding ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

REC Silicon ASA quarterly revenues are $33.8M, which are smaller than Crayon Group Holding ASA quarterly revenues of $150.9M. REC Silicon ASA's net income of -$52.6M is lower than Crayon Group Holding ASA's net income of $7.2M. Notably, REC Silicon ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.67x while Crayon Group Holding ASA's PE ratio is 76.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for REC Silicon ASA is 0.33x versus 1.46x for Crayon Group Holding ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ensurge Micropower ASA has a net margin of -155.62% compared to REC Silicon ASA's net margin of -13966.67%. REC Silicon ASA's return on equity of -1132.18% beat Ensurge Micropower ASA's return on equity of --.

REC Silicon ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ensurge Micropower ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that REC Silicon ASA has higher upside potential than Ensurge Micropower ASA, analysts believe REC Silicon ASA is more attractive than Ensurge Micropower ASA.

REC Silicon ASA has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ensurge Micropower ASA has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.657%.

REC Silicon ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ensurge Micropower ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. REC Silicon ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ensurge Micropower ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

REC Silicon ASA quarterly revenues are $33.8M, which are larger than Ensurge Micropower ASA quarterly revenues of $21K. REC Silicon ASA's net income of -$52.6M is lower than Ensurge Micropower ASA's net income of -$2.9M. Notably, REC Silicon ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.67x while Ensurge Micropower ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for REC Silicon ASA is 0.33x versus 195.85x for Ensurge Micropower ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IDEX Biometrics ASA has a net margin of -155.62% compared to REC Silicon ASA's net margin of --. REC Silicon ASA's return on equity of -1132.18% beat IDEX Biometrics ASA's return on equity of --.

REC Silicon ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IDEX Biometrics ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2499900%. Given that IDEX Biometrics ASA has higher upside potential than REC Silicon ASA, analysts believe IDEX Biometrics ASA is more attractive than REC Silicon ASA.

REC Silicon ASA has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDEX Biometrics ASA has a beta of 74.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7309.128%.

REC Silicon ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IDEX Biometrics ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. REC Silicon ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IDEX Biometrics ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

REC Silicon ASA quarterly revenues are $33.8M, which are larger than IDEX Biometrics ASA quarterly revenues of --. REC Silicon ASA's net income of -$52.6M is higher than IDEX Biometrics ASA's net income of --. Notably, REC Silicon ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.67x while IDEX Biometrics ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for REC Silicon ASA is 0.33x versus 0.01x for IDEX Biometrics ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pexip Holding ASA has a net margin of -155.62% compared to REC Silicon ASA's net margin of 2.54%. REC Silicon ASA's return on equity of -1132.18% beat Pexip Holding ASA's return on equity of 0.06%.

REC Silicon ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pexip Holding ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that REC Silicon ASA has higher upside potential than Pexip Holding ASA, analysts believe REC Silicon ASA is more attractive than Pexip Holding ASA.

REC Silicon ASA has a beta of 0.934, which suggesting that the stock is 6.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pexip Holding ASA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

REC Silicon ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pexip Holding ASA offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. REC Silicon ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pexip Holding ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

REC Silicon ASA quarterly revenues are $33.8M, which are larger than Pexip Holding ASA quarterly revenues of $21.3M. REC Silicon ASA's net income of -$52.6M is lower than Pexip Holding ASA's net income of $539.5K. Notably, REC Silicon ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.67x while Pexip Holding ASA's PE ratio is 14,918.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for REC Silicon ASA is 0.33x versus 3.70x for Pexip Holding ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.