ATEAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ensurge Micropower ASA has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Atea ASA's net margin of -13966.67%. Atea ASA's return on equity of 18.19% beat Ensurge Micropower ASA's return on equity of --.

Atea ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ensurge Micropower ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Atea ASA has higher upside potential than Ensurge Micropower ASA, analysts believe Atea ASA is more attractive than Ensurge Micropower ASA.

Atea ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ensurge Micropower ASA has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.657%.

Atea ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.17%. Ensurge Micropower ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atea ASA pays 86.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Ensurge Micropower ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Atea ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Atea ASA quarterly revenues are $743.1M, which are larger than Ensurge Micropower ASA quarterly revenues of $21K. Atea ASA's net income of $17.9M is higher than Ensurge Micropower ASA's net income of -$2.9M. Notably, Atea ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.49x while Ensurge Micropower ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atea ASA is 0.45x versus 214.06x for Ensurge Micropower ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IDEX Biometrics ASA has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Atea ASA's net margin of --. Atea ASA's return on equity of 18.19% beat IDEX Biometrics ASA's return on equity of --.

Atea ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IDEX Biometrics ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2499900%. Given that IDEX Biometrics ASA has higher upside potential than Atea ASA, analysts believe IDEX Biometrics ASA is more attractive than Atea ASA.

Atea ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDEX Biometrics ASA has a beta of 74.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7309.128%.

Atea ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.17%. IDEX Biometrics ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atea ASA pays 86.63% of its earnings as a dividend. IDEX Biometrics ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Atea ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Atea ASA quarterly revenues are $743.1M, which are larger than IDEX Biometrics ASA quarterly revenues of --. Atea ASA's net income of $17.9M is higher than IDEX Biometrics ASA's net income of --. Notably, Atea ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.49x while IDEX Biometrics ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atea ASA is 0.45x versus 0.01x for IDEX Biometrics ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pexip Holding ASA has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Atea ASA's net margin of 2.54%. Atea ASA's return on equity of 18.19% beat Pexip Holding ASA's return on equity of 0.06%.

Atea ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pexip Holding ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Atea ASA has higher upside potential than Pexip Holding ASA, analysts believe Atea ASA is more attractive than Pexip Holding ASA.

Atea ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pexip Holding ASA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Atea ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.17%. Pexip Holding ASA offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Atea ASA pays 86.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Pexip Holding ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Atea ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Atea ASA quarterly revenues are $743.1M, which are larger than Pexip Holding ASA quarterly revenues of $21.3M. Atea ASA's net income of $17.9M is higher than Pexip Holding ASA's net income of $539.5K. Notably, Atea ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.49x while Pexip Holding ASA's PE ratio is 14,918.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atea ASA is 0.45x versus 3.70x for Pexip Holding ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

REC Silicon ASA has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Atea ASA's net margin of -155.62%. Atea ASA's return on equity of 18.19% beat REC Silicon ASA's return on equity of -1132.18%.

Atea ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand REC Silicon ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Atea ASA has higher upside potential than REC Silicon ASA, analysts believe Atea ASA is more attractive than REC Silicon ASA.

Atea ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REC Silicon ASA has a beta of 0.934, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.631%.

Atea ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.17%. REC Silicon ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atea ASA pays 86.63% of its earnings as a dividend. REC Silicon ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Atea ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Atea ASA quarterly revenues are $743.1M, which are larger than REC Silicon ASA quarterly revenues of $33.8M. Atea ASA's net income of $17.9M is higher than REC Silicon ASA's net income of -$52.6M. Notably, Atea ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.49x while REC Silicon ASA's PE ratio is 16.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atea ASA is 0.45x versus 0.29x for REC Silicon ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.