ATEAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

IDEX Biometrics ASA has a net margin of 2.96% compared to Atea ASA's net margin of --. Atea ASA's return on equity of 20.55% beat IDEX Biometrics ASA's return on equity of --.

Atea ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IDEX Biometrics ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Atea ASA has higher upside potential than IDEX Biometrics ASA, analysts believe Atea ASA is more attractive than IDEX Biometrics ASA.

Atea ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDEX Biometrics ASA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Atea ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.45%. IDEX Biometrics ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atea ASA pays 85.27% of its earnings as a dividend. IDEX Biometrics ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Atea ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Atea ASA quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than IDEX Biometrics ASA quarterly revenues of --. Atea ASA's net income of $33M is higher than IDEX Biometrics ASA's net income of --. Notably, Atea ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.41x while IDEX Biometrics ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atea ASA is 0.48x versus -- for IDEX Biometrics ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordic Semiconductor ASA has a net margin of 2.96% compared to Atea ASA's net margin of 2.51%. Atea ASA's return on equity of 20.55% beat Nordic Semiconductor ASA's return on equity of 2.68%.

Atea ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nordic Semiconductor ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Atea ASA has higher upside potential than Nordic Semiconductor ASA, analysts believe Atea ASA is more attractive than Nordic Semiconductor ASA.

Atea ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordic Semiconductor ASA has a beta of 1.425, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.475%.

Atea ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.45%. Nordic Semiconductor ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atea ASA pays 85.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordic Semiconductor ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Atea ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Atea ASA quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Nordic Semiconductor ASA quarterly revenues of $169.5M. Atea ASA's net income of $33M is higher than Nordic Semiconductor ASA's net income of $4.2M. Notably, Atea ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.41x while Nordic Semiconductor ASA's PE ratio is 180.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atea ASA is 0.48x versus 4.45x for Nordic Semiconductor ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pexip Holding ASA has a net margin of 2.96% compared to Atea ASA's net margin of 21.55%. Atea ASA's return on equity of 20.55% beat Pexip Holding ASA's return on equity of 13.77%.

Atea ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pexip Holding ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Atea ASA has higher upside potential than Pexip Holding ASA, analysts believe Atea ASA is more attractive than Pexip Holding ASA.

Atea ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pexip Holding ASA has a beta of 1.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.518%.

Atea ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.45%. Pexip Holding ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Atea ASA pays 85.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Pexip Holding ASA pays out 198.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Atea ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Pexip Holding ASA's is not.

Atea ASA quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Pexip Holding ASA quarterly revenues of $33.1M. Atea ASA's net income of $33M is higher than Pexip Holding ASA's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Atea ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.41x while Pexip Holding ASA's PE ratio is 40.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atea ASA is 0.48x versus 6.88x for Pexip Holding ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

REC Silicon ASA has a net margin of 2.96% compared to Atea ASA's net margin of -111.24%. Atea ASA's return on equity of 20.55% beat REC Silicon ASA's return on equity of -1132.18%.

Atea ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand REC Silicon ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Atea ASA has higher upside potential than REC Silicon ASA, analysts believe Atea ASA is more attractive than REC Silicon ASA.

Atea ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REC Silicon ASA has a beta of 0.239, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.128%.

Atea ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.45%. REC Silicon ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atea ASA pays 85.27% of its earnings as a dividend. REC Silicon ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Atea ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Atea ASA quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than REC Silicon ASA quarterly revenues of $16.9M. Atea ASA's net income of $33M is higher than REC Silicon ASA's net income of -$18.8M. Notably, Atea ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.41x while REC Silicon ASA's PE ratio is 16.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atea ASA is 0.48x versus 0.08x for REC Silicon ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.