Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
94
PXPHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.66
Seasonality move
:
2.93%
Day range:
$7.66 - $7.66
52-week range:
$3.28 - $7.66
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
40.85x
P/S ratio:
6.88x
P/B ratio:
5.24x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
5.1K
1-year change:
110.3%
Market cap:
$784.5M
Revenue:
$118.3M
EPS (TTM):
$0.19
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PXPHF
Pexip Holding ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ATEAY
Atea ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ENMPF
Ensurge Micropower ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IDXAF
IDEX Biometrics ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NDCVF
Nordic Semiconductor ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RNWEF
REC Silicon ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PXPHF
Pexip Holding ASA
|
$7.66 | -- | $784.5M | 40.85x | $0.23 | 0% | 6.88x |
|
ATEAY
Atea ASA
|
$7.70 | -- | $1.7B | 20.41x | $0.17 | 4.45% | 0.48x |
|
ENMPF
Ensurge Micropower ASA
|
$0.09 | -- | $82.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2,569.19x |
|
IDXAF
IDEX Biometrics ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
NDCVF
Nordic Semiconductor ASA
|
$15.16 | -- | $3B | 180.69x | $0.00 | 0% | 4.45x |
|
RNWEF
REC Silicon ASA
|
$0.02 | -- | $8.4M | 16.67x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.08x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PXPHF
Pexip Holding ASA
|
3.18% | 3.559 | 0.74% | 1.58x |
|
ATEAY
Atea ASA
|
32.52% | 0.572 | 11.94% | 0.70x |
|
ENMPF
Ensurge Micropower ASA
|
71.66% | 1.272 | 8.11% | 0.42x |
|
IDXAF
IDEX Biometrics ASA
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
NDCVF
Nordic Semiconductor ASA
|
19.21% | 1.470 | 6.25% | 2.76x |
|
RNWEF
REC Silicon ASA
|
940.87% | -3.733 | 867.21% | 0.04x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PXPHF
Pexip Holding ASA
|
$8.1M | $7.9M | 13.28% | 13.77% | 23.79% | $7.2M |
|
ATEAY
Atea ASA
|
$73.8M | $48.5M | 12.87% | 20.55% | 4.35% | $177.9M |
|
ENMPF
Ensurge Micropower ASA
|
-$517K | -$2.1M | -68.37% | -- | -8348% | -$4.4M |
|
IDXAF
IDEX Biometrics ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NDCVF
Nordic Semiconductor ASA
|
$4.8M | $3.6M | 2.13% | 2.68% | 2.13% | -$859.8K |
|
RNWEF
REC Silicon ASA
|
-$10.8M | -$10.8M | -40.25% | -1132.18% | -63.91% | -$31.4M |
Pexip Holding ASA vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PXPHF or ATEAY?
Atea ASA has a net margin of 21.55% compared to Pexip Holding ASA's net margin of 2.96%. Pexip Holding ASA's return on equity of 13.77% beat Atea ASA's return on equity of 20.55%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PXPHFPexip Holding ASA24.5% $0.07 $154.7M ATEAYAtea ASA6.62% $0.15 $667.1M -
What do Analysts Say About PXPHF or ATEAY?
Pexip Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Atea ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pexip Holding ASA has higher upside potential than Atea ASA, analysts believe Pexip Holding ASA is more attractive than Atea ASA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PXPHFPexip Holding ASA0 0 0 ATEAYAtea ASA0 0 0 -
Is PXPHF or ATEAY More Risky?
Pexip Holding ASA has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.518% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atea ASA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PXPHF or ATEAY?
Pexip Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Atea ASA offers a yield of 4.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Pexip Holding ASA pays 198.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Atea ASA pays out 85.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Atea ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Pexip Holding ASA's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PXPHF or ATEAY?
Pexip Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $33.1M, which are smaller than Atea ASA quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Pexip Holding ASA's net income of $7.1M is lower than Atea ASA's net income of $33M. Notably, Pexip Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.85x while Atea ASA's PE ratio is 20.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pexip Holding ASA is 6.88x versus 0.48x for Atea ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PXPHFPexip Holding ASA6.88x 40.85x $33.1M $7.1M ATEAYAtea ASA0.48x 20.41x $1.1B $33M
-
Which has Higher Returns PXPHF or ENMPF?
Ensurge Micropower ASA has a net margin of 21.55% compared to Pexip Holding ASA's net margin of -5700%. Pexip Holding ASA's return on equity of 13.77% beat Ensurge Micropower ASA's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PXPHFPexip Holding ASA24.5% $0.07 $154.7M ENMPFEnsurge Micropower ASA-2068% -$0.00 $14.9M -
What do Analysts Say About PXPHF or ENMPF?
Pexip Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ensurge Micropower ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pexip Holding ASA has higher upside potential than Ensurge Micropower ASA, analysts believe Pexip Holding ASA is more attractive than Ensurge Micropower ASA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PXPHFPexip Holding ASA0 0 0 ENMPFEnsurge Micropower ASA0 0 0 -
Is PXPHF or ENMPF More Risky?
Pexip Holding ASA has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.518% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ensurge Micropower ASA has a beta of 3.748, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 274.806%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PXPHF or ENMPF?
Pexip Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ensurge Micropower ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pexip Holding ASA pays 198.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Ensurge Micropower ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PXPHF or ENMPF?
Pexip Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $33.1M, which are larger than Ensurge Micropower ASA quarterly revenues of $25K. Pexip Holding ASA's net income of $7.1M is higher than Ensurge Micropower ASA's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Pexip Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.85x while Ensurge Micropower ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pexip Holding ASA is 6.88x versus 2,569.19x for Ensurge Micropower ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PXPHFPexip Holding ASA6.88x 40.85x $33.1M $7.1M ENMPFEnsurge Micropower ASA2,569.19x -- $25K -$1.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns PXPHF or IDXAF?
IDEX Biometrics ASA has a net margin of 21.55% compared to Pexip Holding ASA's net margin of --. Pexip Holding ASA's return on equity of 13.77% beat IDEX Biometrics ASA's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PXPHFPexip Holding ASA24.5% $0.07 $154.7M IDXAFIDEX Biometrics ASA-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PXPHF or IDXAF?
Pexip Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IDEX Biometrics ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pexip Holding ASA has higher upside potential than IDEX Biometrics ASA, analysts believe Pexip Holding ASA is more attractive than IDEX Biometrics ASA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PXPHFPexip Holding ASA0 0 0 IDXAFIDEX Biometrics ASA0 0 0 -
Is PXPHF or IDXAF More Risky?
Pexip Holding ASA has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.518% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDEX Biometrics ASA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PXPHF or IDXAF?
Pexip Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IDEX Biometrics ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pexip Holding ASA pays 198.15% of its earnings as a dividend. IDEX Biometrics ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PXPHF or IDXAF?
Pexip Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $33.1M, which are larger than IDEX Biometrics ASA quarterly revenues of --. Pexip Holding ASA's net income of $7.1M is higher than IDEX Biometrics ASA's net income of --. Notably, Pexip Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.85x while IDEX Biometrics ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pexip Holding ASA is 6.88x versus -- for IDEX Biometrics ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PXPHFPexip Holding ASA6.88x 40.85x $33.1M $7.1M IDXAFIDEX Biometrics ASA-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PXPHF or NDCVF?
Nordic Semiconductor ASA has a net margin of 21.55% compared to Pexip Holding ASA's net margin of 2.51%. Pexip Holding ASA's return on equity of 13.77% beat Nordic Semiconductor ASA's return on equity of 2.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PXPHFPexip Holding ASA24.5% $0.07 $154.7M NDCVFNordic Semiconductor ASA2.81% $0.02 $841.2M -
What do Analysts Say About PXPHF or NDCVF?
Pexip Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nordic Semiconductor ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pexip Holding ASA has higher upside potential than Nordic Semiconductor ASA, analysts believe Pexip Holding ASA is more attractive than Nordic Semiconductor ASA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PXPHFPexip Holding ASA0 0 0 NDCVFNordic Semiconductor ASA0 0 0 -
Is PXPHF or NDCVF More Risky?
Pexip Holding ASA has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.518% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordic Semiconductor ASA has a beta of 1.425, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.475%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PXPHF or NDCVF?
Pexip Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nordic Semiconductor ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pexip Holding ASA pays 198.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordic Semiconductor ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PXPHF or NDCVF?
Pexip Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $33.1M, which are smaller than Nordic Semiconductor ASA quarterly revenues of $169.5M. Pexip Holding ASA's net income of $7.1M is higher than Nordic Semiconductor ASA's net income of $4.2M. Notably, Pexip Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.85x while Nordic Semiconductor ASA's PE ratio is 180.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pexip Holding ASA is 6.88x versus 4.45x for Nordic Semiconductor ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PXPHFPexip Holding ASA6.88x 40.85x $33.1M $7.1M NDCVFNordic Semiconductor ASA4.45x 180.69x $169.5M $4.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns PXPHF or RNWEF?
REC Silicon ASA has a net margin of 21.55% compared to Pexip Holding ASA's net margin of -111.24%. Pexip Holding ASA's return on equity of 13.77% beat REC Silicon ASA's return on equity of -1132.18%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PXPHFPexip Holding ASA24.5% $0.07 $154.7M RNWEFREC Silicon ASA-63.91% -$0.03 $50.4M -
What do Analysts Say About PXPHF or RNWEF?
Pexip Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand REC Silicon ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pexip Holding ASA has higher upside potential than REC Silicon ASA, analysts believe Pexip Holding ASA is more attractive than REC Silicon ASA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PXPHFPexip Holding ASA0 0 0 RNWEFREC Silicon ASA0 0 0 -
Is PXPHF or RNWEF More Risky?
Pexip Holding ASA has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.518% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REC Silicon ASA has a beta of 0.239, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.128%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PXPHF or RNWEF?
Pexip Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. REC Silicon ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pexip Holding ASA pays 198.15% of its earnings as a dividend. REC Silicon ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PXPHF or RNWEF?
Pexip Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $33.1M, which are larger than REC Silicon ASA quarterly revenues of $16.9M. Pexip Holding ASA's net income of $7.1M is higher than REC Silicon ASA's net income of -$18.8M. Notably, Pexip Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.85x while REC Silicon ASA's PE ratio is 16.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pexip Holding ASA is 6.88x versus 0.08x for REC Silicon ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PXPHFPexip Holding ASA6.88x 40.85x $33.1M $7.1M RNWEFREC Silicon ASA0.08x 16.67x $16.9M -$18.8M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
