PXPHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crayon Group Holding ASA has a net margin of 2.54% compared to Pexip Holding ASA's net margin of 4.75%. Pexip Holding ASA's return on equity of 0.06% beat Crayon Group Holding ASA's return on equity of 5.11%.

Pexip Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Crayon Group Holding ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pexip Holding ASA has higher upside potential than Crayon Group Holding ASA, analysts believe Pexip Holding ASA is more attractive than Crayon Group Holding ASA.

Pexip Holding ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crayon Group Holding ASA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pexip Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.52%. Crayon Group Holding ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pexip Holding ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crayon Group Holding ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pexip Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $21.3M, which are smaller than Crayon Group Holding ASA quarterly revenues of $150.9M. Pexip Holding ASA's net income of $539.5K is lower than Crayon Group Holding ASA's net income of $7.2M. Notably, Pexip Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 14,918.03x while Crayon Group Holding ASA's PE ratio is 80.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pexip Holding ASA is 3.70x versus 1.55x for Crayon Group Holding ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ensurge Micropower ASA has a net margin of 2.54% compared to Pexip Holding ASA's net margin of -13966.67%. Pexip Holding ASA's return on equity of 0.06% beat Ensurge Micropower ASA's return on equity of --.

Pexip Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ensurge Micropower ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pexip Holding ASA has higher upside potential than Ensurge Micropower ASA, analysts believe Pexip Holding ASA is more attractive than Ensurge Micropower ASA.

Pexip Holding ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ensurge Micropower ASA has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.657%.

Pexip Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.52%. Ensurge Micropower ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pexip Holding ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ensurge Micropower ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pexip Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $21.3M, which are larger than Ensurge Micropower ASA quarterly revenues of $21K. Pexip Holding ASA's net income of $539.5K is higher than Ensurge Micropower ASA's net income of -$2.9M. Notably, Pexip Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 14,918.03x while Ensurge Micropower ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pexip Holding ASA is 3.70x versus 214.06x for Ensurge Micropower ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IDEX Biometrics ASA has a net margin of 2.54% compared to Pexip Holding ASA's net margin of --. Pexip Holding ASA's return on equity of 0.06% beat IDEX Biometrics ASA's return on equity of --.

Pexip Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IDEX Biometrics ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2499900%. Given that IDEX Biometrics ASA has higher upside potential than Pexip Holding ASA, analysts believe IDEX Biometrics ASA is more attractive than Pexip Holding ASA.

Pexip Holding ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDEX Biometrics ASA has a beta of 74.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7309.128%.

Pexip Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.52%. IDEX Biometrics ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pexip Holding ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IDEX Biometrics ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pexip Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $21.3M, which are larger than IDEX Biometrics ASA quarterly revenues of --. Pexip Holding ASA's net income of $539.5K is higher than IDEX Biometrics ASA's net income of --. Notably, Pexip Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 14,918.03x while IDEX Biometrics ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pexip Holding ASA is 3.70x versus 0.01x for IDEX Biometrics ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

REC Silicon ASA has a net margin of 2.54% compared to Pexip Holding ASA's net margin of -155.62%. Pexip Holding ASA's return on equity of 0.06% beat REC Silicon ASA's return on equity of -1132.18%.

Pexip Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand REC Silicon ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pexip Holding ASA has higher upside potential than REC Silicon ASA, analysts believe Pexip Holding ASA is more attractive than REC Silicon ASA.

Pexip Holding ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REC Silicon ASA has a beta of 0.934, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.631%.

Pexip Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.52%. REC Silicon ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pexip Holding ASA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. REC Silicon ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pexip Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $21.3M, which are smaller than REC Silicon ASA quarterly revenues of $33.8M. Pexip Holding ASA's net income of $539.5K is higher than REC Silicon ASA's net income of -$52.6M. Notably, Pexip Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 14,918.03x while REC Silicon ASA's PE ratio is 16.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pexip Holding ASA is 3.70x versus 0.29x for REC Silicon ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.