Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Buy
82
PXPHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$6.52
Seasonality move
:
14.7%
Day range:
$6.52 - $6.52
52-week range:
$3.28 - $6.52
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
38.12x
P/S ratio:
6.02x
P/B ratio:
4.86x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
78.99%
Market cap:
$667.6M
Revenue:
$104M
EPS (TTM):
$0.17
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PXPHF
Pexip Holding ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ATEAY
Atea ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ENMPF
Ensurge Micropower ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IDXAF
IDEX Biometrics ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NDCVF
Nordic Semiconductor ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RNWEY
REC Silicon ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PXPHF
Pexip Holding ASA
|
$6.52 | -- | $667.6M | 38.12x | $0.23 | 0% | 6.02x |
|
ATEAY
Atea ASA
|
$8.22 | -- | $1.8B | 24.68x | $0.17 | 4.09% | 0.54x |
|
ENMPF
Ensurge Micropower ASA
|
$0.10 | -- | $80.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3,064.13x |
|
IDXAF
IDEX Biometrics ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
NDCVF
Nordic Semiconductor ASA
|
$12.65 | -- | $2.5B | 297.65x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.77x |
|
RNWEY
REC Silicon ASA
|
$0.06 | -- | $25.2M | 16.34x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.25x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PXPHF
Pexip Holding ASA
|
3.61% | 3.212 | 0.77% | 1.13x |
|
ATEAY
Atea ASA
|
41.69% | 0.705 | 20.34% | 0.51x |
|
ENMPF
Ensurge Micropower ASA
|
71.66% | -0.866 | 8.11% | 0.42x |
|
IDXAF
IDEX Biometrics ASA
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
NDCVF
Nordic Semiconductor ASA
|
19.48% | 1.583 | 5.4% | 2.98x |
|
RNWEY
REC Silicon ASA
|
940.87% | -1.014 | 805.24% | 0.04x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PXPHF
Pexip Holding ASA
|
$3.8M | $3.8M | 12.21% | 12.67% | 14.36% | $3.5M |
|
ATEAY
Atea ASA
|
$55.6M | $34.5M | 11.4% | 18.63% | 4.13% | $9.5M |
|
ENMPF
Ensurge Micropower ASA
|
-$517K | -$2.1M | -68.37% | -- | -8348% | -$4.4M |
|
IDXAF
IDEX Biometrics ASA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NDCVF
Nordic Semiconductor ASA
|
$28.7M | $4.4M | 1.11% | 1.4% | 2.48% | -$10.1M |
|
RNWEY
REC Silicon ASA
|
-$10.8M | -$10.8M | -40.21% | -1132.18% | -63.91% | -$31.4M |
Pexip Holding ASA vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PXPHF or ATEAY?
Atea ASA has a net margin of 9.65% compared to Pexip Holding ASA's net margin of 2.68%. Pexip Holding ASA's return on equity of 12.67% beat Atea ASA's return on equity of 18.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PXPHFPexip Holding ASA14.36% $0.02 $142.6M ATEAYAtea ASA6.65% $0.10 $713.6M -
What do Analysts Say About PXPHF or ATEAY?
Pexip Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Atea ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pexip Holding ASA has higher upside potential than Atea ASA, analysts believe Pexip Holding ASA is more attractive than Atea ASA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PXPHFPexip Holding ASA0 0 0 ATEAYAtea ASA0 0 0 -
Is PXPHF or ATEAY More Risky?
Pexip Holding ASA has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atea ASA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PXPHF or ATEAY?
Pexip Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Atea ASA offers a yield of 4.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Pexip Holding ASA pays 172.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Atea ASA pays out 85.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Atea ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Pexip Holding ASA's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PXPHF or ATEAY?
Pexip Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $26.3M, which are smaller than Atea ASA quarterly revenues of $835.2M. Pexip Holding ASA's net income of $2.5M is lower than Atea ASA's net income of $22.4M. Notably, Pexip Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.12x while Atea ASA's PE ratio is 24.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pexip Holding ASA is 6.02x versus 0.54x for Atea ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PXPHFPexip Holding ASA6.02x 38.12x $26.3M $2.5M ATEAYAtea ASA0.54x 24.68x $835.2M $22.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns PXPHF or ENMPF?
Ensurge Micropower ASA has a net margin of 9.65% compared to Pexip Holding ASA's net margin of -5700%. Pexip Holding ASA's return on equity of 12.67% beat Ensurge Micropower ASA's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PXPHFPexip Holding ASA14.36% $0.02 $142.6M ENMPFEnsurge Micropower ASA-2068% -$0.00 $14.9M -
What do Analysts Say About PXPHF or ENMPF?
Pexip Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ensurge Micropower ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pexip Holding ASA has higher upside potential than Ensurge Micropower ASA, analysts believe Pexip Holding ASA is more attractive than Ensurge Micropower ASA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PXPHFPexip Holding ASA0 0 0 ENMPFEnsurge Micropower ASA0 0 0 -
Is PXPHF or ENMPF More Risky?
Pexip Holding ASA has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ensurge Micropower ASA has a beta of 3.952, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 295.179%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PXPHF or ENMPF?
Pexip Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ensurge Micropower ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pexip Holding ASA pays 172.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Ensurge Micropower ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PXPHF or ENMPF?
Pexip Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $26.3M, which are larger than Ensurge Micropower ASA quarterly revenues of $25K. Pexip Holding ASA's net income of $2.5M is higher than Ensurge Micropower ASA's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Pexip Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.12x while Ensurge Micropower ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pexip Holding ASA is 6.02x versus 3,064.13x for Ensurge Micropower ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PXPHFPexip Holding ASA6.02x 38.12x $26.3M $2.5M ENMPFEnsurge Micropower ASA3,064.13x -- $25K -$1.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns PXPHF or IDXAF?
IDEX Biometrics ASA has a net margin of 9.65% compared to Pexip Holding ASA's net margin of --. Pexip Holding ASA's return on equity of 12.67% beat IDEX Biometrics ASA's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PXPHFPexip Holding ASA14.36% $0.02 $142.6M IDXAFIDEX Biometrics ASA-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PXPHF or IDXAF?
Pexip Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IDEX Biometrics ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pexip Holding ASA has higher upside potential than IDEX Biometrics ASA, analysts believe Pexip Holding ASA is more attractive than IDEX Biometrics ASA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PXPHFPexip Holding ASA0 0 0 IDXAFIDEX Biometrics ASA0 0 0 -
Is PXPHF or IDXAF More Risky?
Pexip Holding ASA has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDEX Biometrics ASA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PXPHF or IDXAF?
Pexip Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IDEX Biometrics ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pexip Holding ASA pays 172.3% of its earnings as a dividend. IDEX Biometrics ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PXPHF or IDXAF?
Pexip Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $26.3M, which are larger than IDEX Biometrics ASA quarterly revenues of --. Pexip Holding ASA's net income of $2.5M is higher than IDEX Biometrics ASA's net income of --. Notably, Pexip Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.12x while IDEX Biometrics ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pexip Holding ASA is 6.02x versus -- for IDEX Biometrics ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PXPHFPexip Holding ASA6.02x 38.12x $26.3M $2.5M IDXAFIDEX Biometrics ASA-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PXPHF or NDCVF?
Nordic Semiconductor ASA has a net margin of 9.65% compared to Pexip Holding ASA's net margin of 0.48%. Pexip Holding ASA's return on equity of 12.67% beat Nordic Semiconductor ASA's return on equity of 1.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PXPHFPexip Holding ASA14.36% $0.02 $142.6M NDCVFNordic Semiconductor ASA16.05% $0.00 $834.8M -
What do Analysts Say About PXPHF or NDCVF?
Pexip Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nordic Semiconductor ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pexip Holding ASA has higher upside potential than Nordic Semiconductor ASA, analysts believe Pexip Holding ASA is more attractive than Nordic Semiconductor ASA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PXPHFPexip Holding ASA0 0 0 NDCVFNordic Semiconductor ASA0 0 0 -
Is PXPHF or NDCVF More Risky?
Pexip Holding ASA has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordic Semiconductor ASA has a beta of 1.503, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.293%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PXPHF or NDCVF?
Pexip Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nordic Semiconductor ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pexip Holding ASA pays 172.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordic Semiconductor ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PXPHF or NDCVF?
Pexip Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $26.3M, which are smaller than Nordic Semiconductor ASA quarterly revenues of $179M. Pexip Holding ASA's net income of $2.5M is higher than Nordic Semiconductor ASA's net income of $852K. Notably, Pexip Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.12x while Nordic Semiconductor ASA's PE ratio is 297.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pexip Holding ASA is 6.02x versus 3.77x for Nordic Semiconductor ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PXPHFPexip Holding ASA6.02x 38.12x $26.3M $2.5M NDCVFNordic Semiconductor ASA3.77x 297.65x $179M $852K
-
Which has Higher Returns PXPHF or RNWEY?
REC Silicon ASA has a net margin of 9.65% compared to Pexip Holding ASA's net margin of -111.24%. Pexip Holding ASA's return on equity of 12.67% beat REC Silicon ASA's return on equity of -1132.18%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PXPHFPexip Holding ASA14.36% $0.02 $142.6M RNWEYREC Silicon ASA-63.91% -$0.03 $50.4M -
What do Analysts Say About PXPHF or RNWEY?
Pexip Holding ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand REC Silicon ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pexip Holding ASA has higher upside potential than REC Silicon ASA, analysts believe Pexip Holding ASA is more attractive than REC Silicon ASA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PXPHFPexip Holding ASA0 0 0 RNWEYREC Silicon ASA0 0 0 -
Is PXPHF or RNWEY More Risky?
Pexip Holding ASA has a beta of 0.918, which suggesting that the stock is 8.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REC Silicon ASA has a beta of 0.548, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.155%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PXPHF or RNWEY?
Pexip Holding ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. REC Silicon ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pexip Holding ASA pays 172.3% of its earnings as a dividend. REC Silicon ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PXPHF or RNWEY?
Pexip Holding ASA quarterly revenues are $26.3M, which are larger than REC Silicon ASA quarterly revenues of $16.9M. Pexip Holding ASA's net income of $2.5M is higher than REC Silicon ASA's net income of -$18.8M. Notably, Pexip Holding ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.12x while REC Silicon ASA's PE ratio is 16.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pexip Holding ASA is 6.02x versus 0.25x for REC Silicon ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PXPHFPexip Holding ASA6.02x 38.12x $26.3M $2.5M RNWEYREC Silicon ASA0.25x 16.34x $16.9M -$18.8M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 20
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 25.96% over the past day.
Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 20
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is up 17.79% over the past day.
Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 20
Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 17.72% over the past day.
