Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
52
PNGAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$17.35
Seasonality move
:
2.46%
Day range:
$17.27 - $17.88
52-week range:
$9.90 - $18.92
Dividend yield:
4.07%
P/E ratio:
8.08x
P/S ratio:
0.96x
P/B ratio:
1.14x
Volume:
319.7K
Avg. volume:
146.6K
1-year change:
41.13%
Market cap:
$157.8B
Revenue:
$129.8B
EPS (TTM):
$2.16
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNGAY
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.4M | -- | 0.88% | -- | $14.14 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNGAY
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
|
$17.43 | -- | $157.8B | 8.08x | $0.27 | 4.07% | 0.96x |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
$0.13 | -- | $5.1B | 23.05x | $0.00 | 2.49% | 0.80x |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
$5.22 | -- | $22.9B | 4.94x | $0.19 | 8.82% | 0.59x |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.0098 | -- | $312.1K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.01x |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
$6.01 | -- | $24.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.80x |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$12.08 | $14.14 | $799.2M | 9.23x | $1.16 | 9.58% | 2.37x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNGAY
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
|
61.98% | 0.123 | 127.21% | 0.00x |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
81.79% | 0.921 | -- | 2.47x |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
61.65% | 0.014 | -- | 32.62x |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | 113.926 | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -5.773 | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
0.6% | 2.126 | 1.1% | 3.74x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNGAY
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
|
-- | $18.1B | 5.24% | 12.12% | 25.61% | $7.5B |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.28% | 1.39% | -- | -- |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.96% | 4.87% | 129.19% | -$16.2B |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.9M | $21.4M | 6.58% | 6.63% | 23.96% | $80M |
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PNGAY or CCGDF?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 20.47% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net margin of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.12% beat China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PNGAYPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.-- $1.01 $418.9B CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.-- -- $150.1B -
What do Analysts Say About PNGAY or CCGDF?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd., analysts believe Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. is more attractive than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PNGAYPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0 0 0 CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is PNGAY or CCGDF More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.237, which suggesting that the stock is 76.312% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.112, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.157%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PNGAY or CCGDF?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.07%. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. pays 30.8% of its earnings as a dividend. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays out 56.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PNGAY or CCGDF?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $49.5B, which are larger than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net income of $10.1B is higher than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.08x while China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 23.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. is 0.96x versus 0.80x for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PNGAYPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0.96x 8.08x $49.5B $10.1B CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0.80x 23.05x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PNGAY or CMAKY?
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a net margin of 20.47% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net margin of 34.61%. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.12% beat China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PNGAYPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.-- $1.01 $418.9B CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.-- $0.40 $236B -
What do Analysts Say About PNGAY or CMAKY?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd., analysts believe Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. is more attractive than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PNGAYPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0 0 0 CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is PNGAY or CMAKY More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.237, which suggesting that the stock is 76.312% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a beta of 0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.878%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PNGAY or CMAKY?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.07%. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. offers a yield of 8.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. pays 30.8% of its earnings as a dividend. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. pays out 21.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PNGAY or CMAKY?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $49.5B, which are larger than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net income of $10.1B is higher than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.08x while China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. is 0.96x versus 0.59x for China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PNGAYPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0.96x 8.08x $49.5B $10.1B CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.0.59x 4.94x $5.1B $1.8B
-
Which has Higher Returns PNGAY or JPPYY?
Jupai Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 20.47% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net margin of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.12% beat Jupai Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PNGAYPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.-- $1.01 $418.9B JPPYYJupai Holdings Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PNGAY or JPPYY?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jupai Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has higher upside potential than Jupai Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. is more attractive than Jupai Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PNGAYPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0 0 0 JPPYYJupai Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is PNGAY or JPPYY More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.237, which suggesting that the stock is 76.312% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jupai Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 13.518, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1251.811%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PNGAY or JPPYY?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.07%. Jupai Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. pays 30.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Jupai Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PNGAY or JPPYY?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $49.5B, which are larger than Jupai Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net income of $10.1B is higher than Jupai Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.08x while Jupai Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. is 0.96x versus 0.01x for Jupai Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PNGAYPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0.96x 8.08x $49.5B $10.1B JPPYYJupai Holdings Ltd.0.01x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PNGAY or MAAS?
Maase, Inc. has a net margin of 20.47% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net margin of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.12% beat Maase, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PNGAYPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.-- $1.01 $418.9B MAASMaase, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PNGAY or MAAS?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Maase, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has higher upside potential than Maase, Inc., analysts believe Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. is more attractive than Maase, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PNGAYPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0 0 0 MAASMaase, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is PNGAY or MAAS More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.237, which suggesting that the stock is 76.312% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maase, Inc. has a beta of -0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 196.664%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PNGAY or MAAS?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.07%. Maase, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. pays 30.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Maase, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PNGAY or MAAS?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $49.5B, which are larger than Maase, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net income of $10.1B is higher than Maase, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.08x while Maase, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. is 0.96x versus 2.80x for Maase, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PNGAYPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0.96x 8.08x $49.5B $10.1B MAASMaase, Inc.2.80x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PNGAY or NOAH?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 20.47% compared to Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net margin of 34.3%. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.12% beat Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PNGAYPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.-- $1.01 $418.9B NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.97.43% $0.43 $1.4B -
What do Analysts Say About PNGAY or NOAH?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Noah Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $14.14 which suggests that it could grow by 17.09%. Given that Noah Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd., analysts believe Noah Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PNGAYPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0 0 0 NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 1 0 -
Is PNGAY or NOAH More Risky?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a beta of 0.237, which suggesting that the stock is 76.312% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.728, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.234%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PNGAY or NOAH?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.07%. Noah Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 9.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. pays 30.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays out 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PNGAY or NOAH?
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. quarterly revenues are $49.5B, which are larger than Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $89.1M. Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s net income of $10.1B is higher than Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M. Notably, Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.08x while Noah Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd. is 0.96x versus 2.37x for Noah Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PNGAYPing An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.0.96x 8.08x $49.5B $10.1B NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2.37x 9.23x $89.1M $30.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 14.29% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 10.81% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 6.6% over the past day.
