Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
35
PCELF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$3.60
Seasonality move
:
-10.96%
Day range:
$3.60 - $3.60
52-week range:
$1.45 - $5.03
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
662.47x
P/S ratio:
4.87x
P/B ratio:
4.79x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
423
1-year change:
12.5%
Market cap:
$208.4M
Revenue:
$31.6M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.01
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCELF
PowerCell Sweden AB
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASAZY
ASSA ABLOY AB
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ATLKY
Atlas Copco AB
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HSQVY
Husqvarna AB
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SDVKY
Sandvik Aktiebolag
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SKFRY
SKF AB
|
$2.4B | -- | 7.33% | -- | $30.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCELF
PowerCell Sweden AB
|
$3.60 | -- | $208.4M | 662.47x | $0.00 | 0% | 4.87x |
|
ASAZY
ASSA ABLOY AB
|
$19.45 | -- | $43.2B | 29.67x | $0.16 | 1.59% | 2.85x |
|
ATLKY
Atlas Copco AB
|
$18.28 | -- | $89B | 32.78x | $0.16 | 1.62% | 5.27x |
|
HSQVY
Husqvarna AB
|
$9.98 | -- | $2.9B | 19.09x | $0.10 | 1.96% | 0.61x |
|
SDVKY
Sandvik Aktiebolag
|
$32.62 | -- | $40.9B | 28.18x | $0.60 | 1.83% | 3.45x |
|
SKFRY
SKF AB
|
$26.59 | $30.00 | $12.1B | 25.68x | $0.77 | 2.91% | 1.30x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCELF
PowerCell Sweden AB
|
4.9% | 1.154 | 1.06% | 0.07x |
|
ASAZY
ASSA ABLOY AB
|
40.33% | 0.572 | 19.2% | 0.50x |
|
ATLKY
Atlas Copco AB
|
24.94% | 0.958 | 4.55% | 1.09x |
|
HSQVY
Husqvarna AB
|
32.96% | 1.155 | 43.02% | 0.73x |
|
SDVKY
Sandvik Aktiebolag
|
33.64% | 1.046 | 13.91% | 0.09x |
|
SKFRY
SKF AB
|
22.51% | 1.108 | 14.32% | 0.95x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCELF
PowerCell Sweden AB
|
$3.5M | -$2.4M | -1.32% | -1.44% | -26.96% | -$6.5M |
|
ASAZY
ASSA ABLOY AB
|
$1.7B | $689.7M | 8.34% | 14.24% | 17.21% | $643.6M |
|
ATLKY
Atlas Copco AB
|
$1.8B | $908.3M | 19.28% | 25.49% | 20.77% | $772.8M |
|
HSQVY
Husqvarna AB
|
$275.5M | $15.9M | 3.89% | 6.1% | 1.64% | $239.1M |
|
SDVKY
Sandvik Aktiebolag
|
$1.2B | $549.5M | 10.46% | 15.89% | 17.9% | $526.3M |
|
SKFRY
SKF AB
|
$640.2M | $244.3M | 6.64% | 8.79% | 10.34% | $94M |
PowerCell Sweden AB vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PCELF or ASAZY?
ASSA ABLOY AB has a net margin of -17.8% compared to PowerCell Sweden AB's net margin of 10.89%. PowerCell Sweden AB's return on equity of -1.44% beat ASSA ABLOY AB's return on equity of 14.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCELFPowerCell Sweden AB38.57% -$0.03 $45.7M ASAZYASSA ABLOY AB43.16% $0.20 $18.3B -
What do Analysts Say About PCELF or ASAZY?
PowerCell Sweden AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ASSA ABLOY AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PowerCell Sweden AB has higher upside potential than ASSA ABLOY AB, analysts believe PowerCell Sweden AB is more attractive than ASSA ABLOY AB.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCELFPowerCell Sweden AB0 0 0 ASAZYASSA ABLOY AB0 0 0 -
Is PCELF or ASAZY More Risky?
PowerCell Sweden AB has a beta of 1.032, which suggesting that the stock is 3.199% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ASSA ABLOY AB has a beta of 1.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.166%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCELF or ASAZY?
PowerCell Sweden AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ASSA ABLOY AB offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. PowerCell Sweden AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ASSA ABLOY AB pays out 27.58% of its earnings as a dividend. ASSA ABLOY AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCELF or ASAZY?
PowerCell Sweden AB quarterly revenues are $9M, which are smaller than ASSA ABLOY AB quarterly revenues of $4B. PowerCell Sweden AB's net income of -$1.6M is lower than ASSA ABLOY AB's net income of $436.5M. Notably, PowerCell Sweden AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 662.47x while ASSA ABLOY AB's PE ratio is 29.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PowerCell Sweden AB is 4.87x versus 2.85x for ASSA ABLOY AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCELFPowerCell Sweden AB4.87x 662.47x $9M -$1.6M ASAZYASSA ABLOY AB2.85x 29.67x $4B $436.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns PCELF or ATLKY?
Atlas Copco AB has a net margin of -17.8% compared to PowerCell Sweden AB's net margin of 16.04%. PowerCell Sweden AB's return on equity of -1.44% beat Atlas Copco AB's return on equity of 25.49%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCELFPowerCell Sweden AB38.57% -$0.03 $45.7M ATLKYAtlas Copco AB42.27% $0.14 $15.1B -
What do Analysts Say About PCELF or ATLKY?
PowerCell Sweden AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Atlas Copco AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PowerCell Sweden AB has higher upside potential than Atlas Copco AB, analysts believe PowerCell Sweden AB is more attractive than Atlas Copco AB.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCELFPowerCell Sweden AB0 0 0 ATLKYAtlas Copco AB0 0 0 -
Is PCELF or ATLKY More Risky?
PowerCell Sweden AB has a beta of 1.032, which suggesting that the stock is 3.199% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlas Copco AB has a beta of 1.406, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.579%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCELF or ATLKY?
PowerCell Sweden AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Atlas Copco AB offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. PowerCell Sweden AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Atlas Copco AB pays out 40.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Atlas Copco AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCELF or ATLKY?
PowerCell Sweden AB quarterly revenues are $9M, which are smaller than Atlas Copco AB quarterly revenues of $4.4B. PowerCell Sweden AB's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Atlas Copco AB's net income of $701.3M. Notably, PowerCell Sweden AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 662.47x while Atlas Copco AB's PE ratio is 32.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PowerCell Sweden AB is 4.87x versus 5.27x for Atlas Copco AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCELFPowerCell Sweden AB4.87x 662.47x $9M -$1.6M ATLKYAtlas Copco AB5.27x 32.78x $4.4B $701.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns PCELF or HSQVY?
Husqvarna AB has a net margin of -17.8% compared to PowerCell Sweden AB's net margin of -0.11%. PowerCell Sweden AB's return on equity of -1.44% beat Husqvarna AB's return on equity of 6.1%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCELFPowerCell Sweden AB38.57% -$0.03 $45.7M HSQVYHusqvarna AB28.49% -$0.00 $3.9B -
What do Analysts Say About PCELF or HSQVY?
PowerCell Sweden AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Husqvarna AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PowerCell Sweden AB has higher upside potential than Husqvarna AB, analysts believe PowerCell Sweden AB is more attractive than Husqvarna AB.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCELFPowerCell Sweden AB0 0 0 HSQVYHusqvarna AB0 0 0 -
Is PCELF or HSQVY More Risky?
PowerCell Sweden AB has a beta of 1.032, which suggesting that the stock is 3.199% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Husqvarna AB has a beta of 1.838, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.757%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCELF or HSQVY?
PowerCell Sweden AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Husqvarna AB offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. PowerCell Sweden AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Husqvarna AB pays out 30.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Husqvarna AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCELF or HSQVY?
PowerCell Sweden AB quarterly revenues are $9M, which are smaller than Husqvarna AB quarterly revenues of $967.1M. PowerCell Sweden AB's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Husqvarna AB's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, PowerCell Sweden AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 662.47x while Husqvarna AB's PE ratio is 19.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PowerCell Sweden AB is 4.87x versus 0.61x for Husqvarna AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCELFPowerCell Sweden AB4.87x 662.47x $9M -$1.6M HSQVYHusqvarna AB0.61x 19.09x $967.1M -$1.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns PCELF or SDVKY?
Sandvik Aktiebolag has a net margin of -17.8% compared to PowerCell Sweden AB's net margin of 12.11%. PowerCell Sweden AB's return on equity of -1.44% beat Sandvik Aktiebolag's return on equity of 15.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCELFPowerCell Sweden AB38.57% -$0.03 $45.7M SDVKYSandvik Aktiebolag40.36% $0.30 $14.6B -
What do Analysts Say About PCELF or SDVKY?
PowerCell Sweden AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sandvik Aktiebolag has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PowerCell Sweden AB has higher upside potential than Sandvik Aktiebolag, analysts believe PowerCell Sweden AB is more attractive than Sandvik Aktiebolag.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCELFPowerCell Sweden AB0 0 0 SDVKYSandvik Aktiebolag0 0 0 -
Is PCELF or SDVKY More Risky?
PowerCell Sweden AB has a beta of 1.032, which suggesting that the stock is 3.199% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sandvik Aktiebolag has a beta of 1.486, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.615%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCELF or SDVKY?
PowerCell Sweden AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sandvik Aktiebolag offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. PowerCell Sweden AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sandvik Aktiebolag pays out 42.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Sandvik Aktiebolag's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCELF or SDVKY?
PowerCell Sweden AB quarterly revenues are $9M, which are smaller than Sandvik Aktiebolag quarterly revenues of $3.1B. PowerCell Sweden AB's net income of -$1.6M is lower than Sandvik Aktiebolag's net income of $371.8M. Notably, PowerCell Sweden AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 662.47x while Sandvik Aktiebolag's PE ratio is 28.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PowerCell Sweden AB is 4.87x versus 3.45x for Sandvik Aktiebolag. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCELFPowerCell Sweden AB4.87x 662.47x $9M -$1.6M SDVKYSandvik Aktiebolag3.45x 28.18x $3.1B $371.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns PCELF or SKFRY?
SKF AB has a net margin of -17.8% compared to PowerCell Sweden AB's net margin of 5.01%. PowerCell Sweden AB's return on equity of -1.44% beat SKF AB's return on equity of 8.79%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCELFPowerCell Sweden AB38.57% -$0.03 $45.7M SKFRYSKF AB27.1% $0.24 $7.6B -
What do Analysts Say About PCELF or SKFRY?
PowerCell Sweden AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SKF AB has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.82%. Given that SKF AB has higher upside potential than PowerCell Sweden AB, analysts believe SKF AB is more attractive than PowerCell Sweden AB.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCELFPowerCell Sweden AB0 0 0 SKFRYSKF AB1 0 0 -
Is PCELF or SKFRY More Risky?
PowerCell Sweden AB has a beta of 1.032, which suggesting that the stock is 3.199% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SKF AB has a beta of 1.138, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.806%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCELF or SKFRY?
PowerCell Sweden AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SKF AB offers a yield of 2.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. PowerCell Sweden AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SKF AB pays out 38.3% of its earnings as a dividend. SKF AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCELF or SKFRY?
PowerCell Sweden AB quarterly revenues are $9M, which are smaller than SKF AB quarterly revenues of $2.4B. PowerCell Sweden AB's net income of -$1.6M is lower than SKF AB's net income of $118.4M. Notably, PowerCell Sweden AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 662.47x while SKF AB's PE ratio is 25.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PowerCell Sweden AB is 4.87x versus 1.30x for SKF AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCELFPowerCell Sweden AB4.87x 662.47x $9M -$1.6M SKFRYSKF AB1.30x 25.68x $2.4B $118.4M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
