SKFRY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Husqvarna AB has a net margin of 2.69% compared to SKF AB's net margin of -10.37%. SKF AB's return on equity of 7.24% beat Husqvarna AB's return on equity of 6.92%.

SKF AB has a consensus price target of $30.50, signalling upside risk potential of 12.13%. On the other hand Husqvarna AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SKF AB has higher upside potential than Husqvarna AB, analysts believe SKF AB is more attractive than Husqvarna AB.

SKF AB has a beta of 1.151, which suggesting that the stock is 15.128% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Husqvarna AB has a beta of 1.792, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.175%.

SKF AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Husqvarna AB offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. SKF AB pays 38.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Husqvarna AB pays out 30.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SKF AB quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Husqvarna AB quarterly revenues of $789.7M. SKF AB's net income of $62.8M is higher than Husqvarna AB's net income of -$81.9M. Notably, SKF AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.59x while Husqvarna AB's PE ratio is 16.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SKF AB is 1.33x versus 0.58x for Husqvarna AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Securitas AB has a net margin of 2.69% compared to SKF AB's net margin of 4.48%. SKF AB's return on equity of 7.24% beat Securitas AB's return on equity of 13.02%.

SKF AB has a consensus price target of $30.50, signalling upside risk potential of 12.13%. On the other hand Securitas AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SKF AB has higher upside potential than Securitas AB, analysts believe SKF AB is more attractive than Securitas AB.

SKF AB has a beta of 1.151, which suggesting that the stock is 15.128% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Securitas AB has a beta of 0.768, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.245%.

SKF AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Securitas AB offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. SKF AB pays 38.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Securitas AB pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SKF AB quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Securitas AB quarterly revenues of $4.1B. SKF AB's net income of $62.8M is lower than Securitas AB's net income of $183.1M. Notably, SKF AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.59x while Securitas AB's PE ratio is 17.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SKF AB is 1.33x versus 0.58x for Securitas AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sandvik Aktiebolag has a net margin of 2.69% compared to SKF AB's net margin of 12.94%. SKF AB's return on equity of 7.24% beat Sandvik Aktiebolag's return on equity of 15.97%.

SKF AB has a consensus price target of $30.50, signalling upside risk potential of 12.13%. On the other hand Sandvik Aktiebolag has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SKF AB has higher upside potential than Sandvik Aktiebolag, analysts believe SKF AB is more attractive than Sandvik Aktiebolag.

SKF AB has a beta of 1.151, which suggesting that the stock is 15.128% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sandvik Aktiebolag has a beta of 1.480, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.007%.

SKF AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Sandvik Aktiebolag offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. SKF AB pays 38.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Sandvik Aktiebolag pays out 42.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SKF AB quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Sandvik Aktiebolag quarterly revenues of $3.5B. SKF AB's net income of $62.8M is lower than Sandvik Aktiebolag's net income of $446.5M. Notably, SKF AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.59x while Sandvik Aktiebolag's PE ratio is 34.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SKF AB is 1.33x versus 4.18x for Sandvik Aktiebolag. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Volvo AB has a net margin of 2.69% compared to SKF AB's net margin of 7.77%. SKF AB's return on equity of 7.24% beat Volvo AB's return on equity of 19.03%.

SKF AB has a consensus price target of $30.50, signalling upside risk potential of 12.13%. On the other hand Volvo AB has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could fall by -9.82%. Given that SKF AB has higher upside potential than Volvo AB, analysts believe SKF AB is more attractive than Volvo AB.

SKF AB has a beta of 1.151, which suggesting that the stock is 15.128% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Volvo AB has a beta of 1.128, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.781%.

SKF AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Volvo AB offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share. SKF AB pays 38.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Volvo AB pays out 23.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SKF AB quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Volvo AB quarterly revenues of $13.2B. SKF AB's net income of $62.8M is lower than Volvo AB's net income of $1B. Notably, SKF AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.59x while Volvo AB's PE ratio is 22.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SKF AB is 1.33x versus 1.61x for Volvo AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.