SKFRY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Atlas Copco AB has a net margin of 2.69% compared to SKF AB's net margin of 15.49%. SKF AB's return on equity of 7.24% beat Atlas Copco AB's return on equity of 24.45%.

SKF AB has a consensus price target of $30.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4.24%. On the other hand Atlas Copco AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SKF AB has higher upside potential than Atlas Copco AB, analysts believe SKF AB is more attractive than Atlas Copco AB.

SKF AB has a beta of 1.151, which suggesting that the stock is 15.128% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlas Copco AB has a beta of 1.427, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.73%.

SKF AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Atlas Copco AB offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. SKF AB pays 38.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Atlas Copco AB pays out 40.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SKF AB quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Atlas Copco AB quarterly revenues of $4.5B. SKF AB's net income of $62.8M is lower than Atlas Copco AB's net income of $704.5M. Notably, SKF AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.98x while Atlas Copco AB's PE ratio is 39.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SKF AB is 1.43x versus 6.13x for Atlas Copco AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Saab AB has a net margin of 2.69% compared to SKF AB's net margin of 9.27%. SKF AB's return on equity of 7.24% beat Saab AB's return on equity of 16.04%.

SKF AB has a consensus price target of $30.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4.24%. On the other hand Saab AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SKF AB has higher upside potential than Saab AB, analysts believe SKF AB is more attractive than Saab AB.

SKF AB has a beta of 1.151, which suggesting that the stock is 15.128% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Saab AB has a beta of 1.102, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.227%.

SKF AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Saab AB offers a yield of 0.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. SKF AB pays 38.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Saab AB pays out 16.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SKF AB quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Saab AB quarterly revenues of $2.9B. SKF AB's net income of $62.8M is lower than Saab AB's net income of $273M. Notably, SKF AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.98x while Saab AB's PE ratio is 59.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SKF AB is 1.43x versus 4.77x for Saab AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sandvik Aktiebolag has a net margin of 2.69% compared to SKF AB's net margin of 12.94%. SKF AB's return on equity of 7.24% beat Sandvik Aktiebolag's return on equity of 15.97%.

SKF AB has a consensus price target of $30.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4.24%. On the other hand Sandvik Aktiebolag has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SKF AB has higher upside potential than Sandvik Aktiebolag, analysts believe SKF AB is more attractive than Sandvik Aktiebolag.

SKF AB has a beta of 1.151, which suggesting that the stock is 15.128% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sandvik Aktiebolag has a beta of 1.480, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.007%.

SKF AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Sandvik Aktiebolag offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. SKF AB pays 38.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Sandvik Aktiebolag pays out 42.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SKF AB quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Sandvik Aktiebolag quarterly revenues of $3.5B. SKF AB's net income of $62.8M is lower than Sandvik Aktiebolag's net income of $446.5M. Notably, SKF AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.98x while Sandvik Aktiebolag's PE ratio is 36.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SKF AB is 1.43x versus 4.49x for Sandvik Aktiebolag. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Volvo AB has a net margin of 2.69% compared to SKF AB's net margin of 7.77%. SKF AB's return on equity of 7.24% beat Volvo AB's return on equity of 19.03%.

SKF AB has a consensus price target of $30.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4.24%. On the other hand Volvo AB has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could fall by -9.68%. Given that SKF AB has higher upside potential than Volvo AB, analysts believe SKF AB is more attractive than Volvo AB.

SKF AB has a beta of 1.151, which suggesting that the stock is 15.128% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Volvo AB has a beta of 1.128, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.781%.

SKF AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Volvo AB offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share. SKF AB pays 38.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Volvo AB pays out 23.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SKF AB quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Volvo AB quarterly revenues of $13.2B. SKF AB's net income of $62.8M is lower than Volvo AB's net income of $1B. Notably, SKF AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.98x while Volvo AB's PE ratio is 22.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SKF AB is 1.43x versus 1.61x for Volvo AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.