VLVLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Atlas Copco AB has a net margin of 8.56% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 16.63%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 29.19% beat Atlas Copco AB's return on equity of 29.27%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $25.01, signalling upside risk potential of 1.97%. On the other hand Atlas Copco AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Atlas Copco AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Atlas Copco AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.273, which suggesting that the stock is 27.32% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlas Copco AB has a beta of 1.168, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.831%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Atlas Copco AB offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Volvo AB pays 57.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Atlas Copco AB pays out 39.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $11.3B, which are larger than Atlas Copco AB quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Volvo AB's net income of $965.3M is higher than Atlas Copco AB's net income of $690.9M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.98x while Atlas Copco AB's PE ratio is 27.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 0.96x versus 4.48x for Atlas Copco AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Husqvarna AB has a net margin of 8.56% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of -1.57%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 29.19% beat Husqvarna AB's return on equity of 5.67%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $25.01, signalling upside risk potential of 1.97%. On the other hand Husqvarna AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Husqvarna AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Husqvarna AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.273, which suggesting that the stock is 27.32% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Husqvarna AB has a beta of 1.845, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.486%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Husqvarna AB offers a yield of 5.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Volvo AB pays 57.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Husqvarna AB pays out 78.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $11.3B, which are larger than Husqvarna AB quarterly revenues of $938.5M. Volvo AB's net income of $965.3M is higher than Husqvarna AB's net income of -$14.7M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.98x while Husqvarna AB's PE ratio is 21.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 0.96x versus 0.64x for Husqvarna AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Securitas AB has a net margin of 8.56% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 2.89%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 29.19% beat Securitas AB's return on equity of 12.22%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $25.01, signalling upside risk potential of 1.97%. On the other hand Securitas AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Securitas AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Securitas AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.273, which suggesting that the stock is 27.32% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Securitas AB has a beta of 1.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.052%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Securitas AB offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Volvo AB pays 57.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Securitas AB pays out 153.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Volvo AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Securitas AB's is not.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $11.3B, which are larger than Securitas AB quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Volvo AB's net income of $965.3M is higher than Securitas AB's net income of $112.2M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.98x while Securitas AB's PE ratio is 16.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 0.96x versus 0.49x for Securitas AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sandvik AB has a net margin of 8.56% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 10.68%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 29.19% beat Sandvik AB's return on equity of 13.48%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $25.01, signalling upside risk potential of 1.97%. On the other hand Sandvik AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Sandvik AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Sandvik AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.273, which suggesting that the stock is 27.32% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sandvik AB has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.442%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Sandvik AB offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Volvo AB pays 57.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Sandvik AB pays out 40.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $11.3B, which are larger than Sandvik AB quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Volvo AB's net income of $965.3M is higher than Sandvik AB's net income of $311.9M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.98x while Sandvik AB's PE ratio is 19.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 0.96x versus 1.94x for Sandvik AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.