VLVLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Atlas Copco AB has a net margin of 7.77% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 15.49%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 19.03% beat Atlas Copco AB's return on equity of 24.45%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling downside risk potential of -9.68%. On the other hand Atlas Copco AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Atlas Copco AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Atlas Copco AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.128, which suggesting that the stock is 12.781% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlas Copco AB has a beta of 1.427, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.73%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Atlas Copco AB offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Volvo AB pays 23.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Atlas Copco AB pays out 40.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $13.2B, which are larger than Atlas Copco AB quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Volvo AB's net income of $1B is higher than Atlas Copco AB's net income of $704.5M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.46x while Atlas Copco AB's PE ratio is 39.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.61x versus 6.13x for Atlas Copco AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OXE Marine AB has a net margin of 7.77% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of -39.2%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 19.03% beat OXE Marine AB's return on equity of -51.95%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling downside risk potential of -9.68%. On the other hand OXE Marine AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than OXE Marine AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than OXE Marine AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.128, which suggesting that the stock is 12.781% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OXE Marine AB has a beta of -5.869, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 686.902%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. OXE Marine AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Volvo AB pays 23.16% of its earnings as a dividend. OXE Marine AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Volvo AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $13.2B, which are larger than OXE Marine AB quarterly revenues of $4.5M. Volvo AB's net income of $1B is higher than OXE Marine AB's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.46x while OXE Marine AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.61x versus 1.61x for OXE Marine AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Saab AB has a net margin of 7.77% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 9.27%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 19.03% beat Saab AB's return on equity of 16.04%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling downside risk potential of -9.68%. On the other hand Saab AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Saab AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Saab AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.128, which suggesting that the stock is 12.781% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Saab AB has a beta of 1.102, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.227%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Saab AB offers a yield of 0.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Volvo AB pays 23.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Saab AB pays out 16.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $13.2B, which are larger than Saab AB quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Volvo AB's net income of $1B is higher than Saab AB's net income of $273M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.46x while Saab AB's PE ratio is 59.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.61x versus 4.77x for Saab AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SKF AB has a net margin of 7.77% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 2.69%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 19.03% beat SKF AB's return on equity of 7.24%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling downside risk potential of -9.68%. On the other hand SKF AB has an analysts' consensus of $30.50 which suggests that it could grow by 4.24%. Given that SKF AB has higher upside potential than Volvo AB, analysts believe SKF AB is more attractive than Volvo AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.128, which suggesting that the stock is 12.781% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SKF AB has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.128%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. SKF AB offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Volvo AB pays 23.16% of its earnings as a dividend. SKF AB pays out 38.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $13.2B, which are larger than SKF AB quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Volvo AB's net income of $1B is higher than SKF AB's net income of $62.8M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.46x while SKF AB's PE ratio is 33.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.61x versus 1.43x for SKF AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.