VLVLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Husqvarna AB has a net margin of 7.77% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of -10.37%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 19.03% beat Husqvarna AB's return on equity of 6.92%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling downside risk potential of -9.82%. On the other hand Husqvarna AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Husqvarna AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Husqvarna AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.128, which suggesting that the stock is 12.781% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Husqvarna AB has a beta of 1.792, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.175%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Husqvarna AB offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Volvo AB pays 23.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Husqvarna AB pays out 30.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $13.2B, which are larger than Husqvarna AB quarterly revenues of $789.7M. Volvo AB's net income of $1B is higher than Husqvarna AB's net income of -$81.9M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.49x while Husqvarna AB's PE ratio is 16.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.61x versus 0.58x for Husqvarna AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Securitas AB has a net margin of 7.77% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 4.48%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 19.03% beat Securitas AB's return on equity of 13.02%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling downside risk potential of -9.82%. On the other hand Securitas AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Securitas AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Securitas AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.128, which suggesting that the stock is 12.781% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Securitas AB has a beta of 0.768, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.245%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Securitas AB offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Volvo AB pays 23.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Securitas AB pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $13.2B, which are larger than Securitas AB quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Volvo AB's net income of $1B is higher than Securitas AB's net income of $183.1M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.49x while Securitas AB's PE ratio is 17.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.61x versus 0.58x for Securitas AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sandvik Aktiebolag has a net margin of 7.77% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 12.94%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 19.03% beat Sandvik Aktiebolag's return on equity of 15.97%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling downside risk potential of -9.82%. On the other hand Sandvik Aktiebolag has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Sandvik Aktiebolag, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Sandvik Aktiebolag.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.128, which suggesting that the stock is 12.781% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sandvik Aktiebolag has a beta of 1.480, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.007%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. Sandvik Aktiebolag offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Volvo AB pays 23.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Sandvik Aktiebolag pays out 42.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $13.2B, which are larger than Sandvik Aktiebolag quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Volvo AB's net income of $1B is higher than Sandvik Aktiebolag's net income of $446.5M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.49x while Sandvik Aktiebolag's PE ratio is 34.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.61x versus 4.18x for Sandvik Aktiebolag. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SKF AB has a net margin of 7.77% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 2.69%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 19.03% beat SKF AB's return on equity of 7.24%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling downside risk potential of -9.82%. On the other hand SKF AB has an analysts' consensus of $30.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.13%. Given that SKF AB has higher upside potential than Volvo AB, analysts believe SKF AB is more attractive than Volvo AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.128, which suggesting that the stock is 12.781% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SKF AB has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.128%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.06%. SKF AB offers a yield of 2.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Volvo AB pays 23.16% of its earnings as a dividend. SKF AB pays out 38.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $13.2B, which are larger than SKF AB quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Volvo AB's net income of $1B is higher than SKF AB's net income of $62.8M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.49x while SKF AB's PE ratio is 31.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.61x versus 1.33x for SKF AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.