Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
52
NWWCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.9800
Seasonality move
:
0.6%
Day range:
$7.8640 - $7.9800
52-week range:
$2.0030 - $8.6533
Dividend yield:
4.66%
P/E ratio:
5.55x
P/S ratio:
1.55x
P/B ratio:
1.60x
Volume:
71.5K
Avg. volume:
5.2K
1-year change:
298.4%
Market cap:
$24.9B
Revenue:
$13.4B
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NWWCF
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.4M | -- | 0.88% | -- | $14.14 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NWWCF
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.
|
$7.9800 | -- | $24.9B | 5.55x | $0.09 | 4.66% | 1.55x |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
$0.13 | -- | $5.1B | 23.05x | $0.00 | 2.49% | 0.80x |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
$5.22 | -- | $22.9B | 4.94x | $0.19 | 8.82% | 0.59x |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.0098 | -- | $312.1K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.01x |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
$6.09 | -- | $25.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.84x |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$12.05 | $14.14 | $797.2M | 9.21x | $1.16 | 9.6% | 2.37x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NWWCF
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.
|
27.71% | -4.337 | -- | 1.74x |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
81.79% | 0.921 | -- | 2.47x |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
61.65% | 0.014 | -- | 32.62x |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | 113.926 | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -5.773 | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
0.6% | 2.126 | 1.1% | 3.74x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NWWCF
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 22.86% | 30.06% | 41.79% | $13.4B |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.28% | 1.39% | -- | -- |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.96% | 4.87% | 129.19% | -$16.2B |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.9M | $21.4M | 6.58% | 6.63% | 23.96% | $80M |
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NWWCF or CCGDF?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 41.15% compared to New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 30.06% beat China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NWWCFNew China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.-- $0.26 $15.2B CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.-- -- $150.1B -
What do Analysts Say About NWWCF or CCGDF?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd., analysts believe New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. is more attractive than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NWWCFNew China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.0 0 0 CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NWWCF or CCGDF More Risky?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has a beta of -20,035.860, which suggesting that the stock is 2003685.962% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.112, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.157%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NWWCF or CCGDF?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.66%. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. pays 30.38% of its earnings as a dividend. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays out 56.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NWWCF or CCGDF?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s net income of $808.5M is higher than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.55x while China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 23.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. is 1.55x versus 0.80x for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NWWCFNew China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.1.55x 5.55x $2B $808.5M CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0.80x 23.05x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NWWCF or CMAKY?
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a net margin of 41.15% compared to New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 34.61%. New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 30.06% beat China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NWWCFNew China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.-- $0.26 $15.2B CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.-- $0.40 $236B -
What do Analysts Say About NWWCF or CMAKY?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd., analysts believe New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. is more attractive than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NWWCFNew China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.0 0 0 CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NWWCF or CMAKY More Risky?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has a beta of -20,035.860, which suggesting that the stock is 2003685.962% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a beta of 0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.878%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NWWCF or CMAKY?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.66%. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. offers a yield of 8.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. pays 30.38% of its earnings as a dividend. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. pays out 21.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NWWCF or CMAKY?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5.1B. New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s net income of $808.5M is lower than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.55x while China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. is 1.55x versus 0.59x for China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NWWCFNew China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.1.55x 5.55x $2B $808.5M CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.0.59x 4.94x $5.1B $1.8B
-
Which has Higher Returns NWWCF or JPPYY?
Jupai Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 41.15% compared to New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 30.06% beat Jupai Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NWWCFNew China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.-- $0.26 $15.2B JPPYYJupai Holdings Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NWWCF or JPPYY?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jupai Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Jupai Holdings Ltd., analysts believe New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Jupai Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NWWCFNew China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.0 0 0 JPPYYJupai Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NWWCF or JPPYY More Risky?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has a beta of -20,035.860, which suggesting that the stock is 2003685.962% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jupai Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 13.518, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1251.811%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NWWCF or JPPYY?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.66%. Jupai Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. pays 30.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Jupai Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NWWCF or JPPYY?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Jupai Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s net income of $808.5M is higher than Jupai Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.55x while Jupai Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. is 1.55x versus 0.01x for Jupai Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NWWCFNew China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.1.55x 5.55x $2B $808.5M JPPYYJupai Holdings Ltd.0.01x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NWWCF or MAAS?
Maase, Inc. has a net margin of 41.15% compared to New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 30.06% beat Maase, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NWWCFNew China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.-- $0.26 $15.2B MAASMaase, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NWWCF or MAAS?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Maase, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Maase, Inc., analysts believe New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Maase, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NWWCFNew China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.0 0 0 MAASMaase, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is NWWCF or MAAS More Risky?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has a beta of -20,035.860, which suggesting that the stock is 2003685.962% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maase, Inc. has a beta of -0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 196.664%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NWWCF or MAAS?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.66%. Maase, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. pays 30.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Maase, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NWWCF or MAAS?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Maase, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s net income of $808.5M is higher than Maase, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.55x while Maase, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. is 1.55x versus 2.84x for Maase, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NWWCFNew China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.1.55x 5.55x $2B $808.5M MAASMaase, Inc.2.84x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NWWCF or NOAH?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 41.15% compared to New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 34.3%. New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 30.06% beat Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NWWCFNew China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.-- $0.26 $15.2B NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.97.43% $0.43 $1.4B -
What do Analysts Say About NWWCF or NOAH?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Noah Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $14.14 which suggests that it could grow by 17.39%. Given that Noah Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd., analysts believe Noah Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NWWCFNew China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.0 0 0 NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 1 0 -
Is NWWCF or NOAH More Risky?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has a beta of -20,035.860, which suggesting that the stock is 2003685.962% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.728, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.234%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NWWCF or NOAH?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.66%. Noah Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 9.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. pays 30.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays out 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NWWCF or NOAH?
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $89.1M. New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s net income of $808.5M is higher than Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M. Notably, New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.55x while Noah Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. is 1.55x versus 2.37x for Noah Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NWWCFNew China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.1.55x 5.55x $2B $808.5M NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2.37x 9.21x $89.1M $30.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
