NINOY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Linkage Global has a net margin of 1.83% compared to Nikon's net margin of --. Nikon's return on equity of 0.91% beat Linkage Global's return on equity of -42.09%.

Nikon has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Linkage Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nikon has higher upside potential than Linkage Global, analysts believe Nikon is more attractive than Linkage Global.

Nikon has a beta of 0.517, which suggesting that the stock is 48.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Linkage Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nikon has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.29%. Linkage Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nikon pays 282.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Linkage Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nikon quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Linkage Global quarterly revenues of --. Nikon's net income of $21.6M is higher than Linkage Global's net income of --. Notably, Nikon's price-to-earnings ratio is 82.95x while Linkage Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nikon is 0.71x versus 0.41x for Linkage Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has a net margin of 1.83% compared to Nikon's net margin of --. Nikon's return on equity of 0.91% beat MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's return on equity of --.

Nikon has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $4.98 which suggests that it could grow by 445.2%. Given that MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has higher upside potential than Nikon, analysts believe MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies is more attractive than Nikon.

Nikon has a beta of 0.517, which suggesting that the stock is 48.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nikon has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.29%. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nikon pays 282.88% of its earnings as a dividend. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nikon quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Nikon's net income of $21.6M is higher than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Nikon's price-to-earnings ratio is 82.95x while MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's PE ratio is 4.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nikon is 0.71x versus 0.10x for MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tokyo Lifestyle has a net margin of 1.83% compared to Nikon's net margin of --. Nikon's return on equity of 0.91% beat Tokyo Lifestyle's return on equity of 19.93%.

Nikon has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tokyo Lifestyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nikon has higher upside potential than Tokyo Lifestyle, analysts believe Nikon is more attractive than Tokyo Lifestyle.

Nikon has a beta of 0.517, which suggesting that the stock is 48.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tokyo Lifestyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nikon has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.29%. Tokyo Lifestyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nikon pays 282.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Tokyo Lifestyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nikon quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Tokyo Lifestyle quarterly revenues of --. Nikon's net income of $21.6M is higher than Tokyo Lifestyle's net income of --. Notably, Nikon's price-to-earnings ratio is 82.95x while Tokyo Lifestyle's PE ratio is 1.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nikon is 0.71x versus 0.07x for Tokyo Lifestyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyota Motor has a net margin of 1.83% compared to Nikon's net margin of 5.38%. Nikon's return on equity of 0.91% beat Toyota Motor's return on equity of 13.1%.

Nikon has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyota Motor has an analysts' consensus of $223.76 which suggests that it could grow by 19.32%. Given that Toyota Motor has higher upside potential than Nikon, analysts believe Toyota Motor is more attractive than Nikon.

Nikon has a beta of 0.517, which suggesting that the stock is 48.32% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyota Motor has a beta of 0.668, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.206%.

Nikon has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.29%. Toyota Motor offers a yield of 2.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.60 per share. Nikon pays 282.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyota Motor pays out 23.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyota Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Nikon's is not.

Nikon quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Toyota Motor quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Nikon's net income of $21.6M is lower than Toyota Motor's net income of $4.4B. Notably, Nikon's price-to-earnings ratio is 82.95x while Toyota Motor's PE ratio is 7.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nikon is 0.71x versus 0.79x for Toyota Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.