NINOY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Linkage Global, Inc. has a net margin of -2.64% compared to Nikon Corp.'s net margin of --. Nikon Corp.'s return on equity of 1.32% beat Linkage Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -42.09%.

Nikon Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Linkage Global, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nikon Corp. has higher upside potential than Linkage Global, Inc., analysts believe Nikon Corp. is more attractive than Linkage Global, Inc..

Nikon Corp. has a beta of 0.538, which suggesting that the stock is 46.163% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Linkage Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nikon Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Linkage Global, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nikon Corp. pays 172.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Linkage Global, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nikon Corp. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Linkage Global, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Nikon Corp.'s net income of -$27.7M is higher than Linkage Global, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Nikon Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 68.46x while Linkage Global, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nikon Corp. is 0.85x versus 2.86x for Linkage Global, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -2.64% compared to Nikon Corp.'s net margin of --. Nikon Corp.'s return on equity of 1.32% beat MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Nikon Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.98 which suggests that it could grow by 132.99%. Given that MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nikon Corp., analysts believe MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Nikon Corp..

Nikon Corp. has a beta of 0.538, which suggesting that the stock is 46.163% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nikon Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nikon Corp. pays 172.14% of its earnings as a dividend. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nikon Corp. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Nikon Corp.'s net income of -$27.7M is higher than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Nikon Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 68.46x while MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nikon Corp. is 0.85x versus 0.26x for MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -2.64% compared to Nikon Corp.'s net margin of --. Nikon Corp.'s return on equity of 1.32% beat Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.49%.

Nikon Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nikon Corp. has higher upside potential than Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd., analysts believe Nikon Corp. is more attractive than Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd..

Nikon Corp. has a beta of 0.538, which suggesting that the stock is 46.163% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nikon Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nikon Corp. pays 172.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nikon Corp. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Nikon Corp.'s net income of -$27.7M is higher than Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Nikon Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 68.46x while Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 2.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nikon Corp. is 0.85x versus 0.06x for Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyota Motor Corp. has a net margin of -2.64% compared to Nikon Corp.'s net margin of 7.86%. Nikon Corp.'s return on equity of 1.32% beat Toyota Motor Corp.'s return on equity of 12.79%.

Nikon Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyota Motor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $230.64 which suggests that it could grow by 16.33%. Given that Toyota Motor Corp. has higher upside potential than Nikon Corp., analysts believe Toyota Motor Corp. is more attractive than Nikon Corp..

Nikon Corp. has a beta of 0.538, which suggesting that the stock is 46.163% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyota Motor Corp. has a beta of 0.670, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.019%.

Nikon Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Toyota Motor Corp. offers a yield of 3.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.87 per share. Nikon Corp. pays 172.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyota Motor Corp. pays out 22.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyota Motor Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Nikon Corp.'s is not.

Nikon Corp. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Toyota Motor Corp. quarterly revenues of $83.9B. Nikon Corp.'s net income of -$27.7M is lower than Toyota Motor Corp.'s net income of $6.6B. Notably, Nikon Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 68.46x while Toyota Motor Corp.'s PE ratio is 8.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nikon Corp. is 0.85x versus 0.78x for Toyota Motor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.