NEWH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to NewHydrogen, Inc.'s net margin of 16.87%. NewHydrogen, Inc.'s return on equity of -115.96% beat Broadwind, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53%.

NewHydrogen, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Broadwind, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.33 which suggests that it could grow by 45.9%. Given that Broadwind, Inc. has higher upside potential than NewHydrogen, Inc., analysts believe Broadwind, Inc. is more attractive than NewHydrogen, Inc..

NewHydrogen, Inc. has a beta of -0.101, which suggesting that the stock is 110.071% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind, Inc. has a beta of 1.507, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.67%.

NewHydrogen, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadwind, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NewHydrogen, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NewHydrogen, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Broadwind, Inc. quarterly revenues of $44.2M. NewHydrogen, Inc.'s net income of -$482.1K is lower than Broadwind, Inc.'s net income of $7.5M. Notably, NewHydrogen, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 45.05x while Broadwind, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NewHydrogen, Inc. is -- versus 0.44x for Broadwind, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVD Equipment Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to NewHydrogen, Inc.'s net margin of 5.18%. NewHydrogen, Inc.'s return on equity of -115.96% beat CVD Equipment Corp.'s return on equity of -0.73%.

NewHydrogen, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CVD Equipment Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 436.91%. Given that CVD Equipment Corp. has higher upside potential than NewHydrogen, Inc., analysts believe CVD Equipment Corp. is more attractive than NewHydrogen, Inc..

NewHydrogen, Inc. has a beta of -0.101, which suggesting that the stock is 110.071% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment Corp. has a beta of 0.815, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.472%.

NewHydrogen, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVD Equipment Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NewHydrogen, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NewHydrogen, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CVD Equipment Corp. quarterly revenues of $7.4M. NewHydrogen, Inc.'s net income of -$482.1K is lower than CVD Equipment Corp.'s net income of $384K. Notably, NewHydrogen, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 45.05x while CVD Equipment Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NewHydrogen, Inc. is -- versus 0.73x for CVD Equipment Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to NewHydrogen, Inc.'s net margin of -2553.07%. NewHydrogen, Inc.'s return on equity of -115.96% beat Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -126.27%.

NewHydrogen, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 324.81%. Given that Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than NewHydrogen, Inc., analysts believe Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than NewHydrogen, Inc..

NewHydrogen, Inc. has a beta of -0.101, which suggesting that the stock is 110.071% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.132%.

NewHydrogen, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NewHydrogen, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NewHydrogen, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $424K. NewHydrogen, Inc.'s net income of -$482.1K is higher than Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$10.8M. Notably, NewHydrogen, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 45.05x while Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NewHydrogen, Inc. is -- versus 15.91x for Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to NewHydrogen, Inc.'s net margin of 14.95%. NewHydrogen, Inc.'s return on equity of -115.96% beat SIFCO Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.15%.

NewHydrogen, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SIFCO Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 85.93%. Given that SIFCO Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than NewHydrogen, Inc., analysts believe SIFCO Industries, Inc. is more attractive than NewHydrogen, Inc..

NewHydrogen, Inc. has a beta of -0.101, which suggesting that the stock is 110.071% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.961%.

NewHydrogen, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NewHydrogen, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NewHydrogen, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SIFCO Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22.1M. NewHydrogen, Inc.'s net income of -$482.1K is lower than SIFCO Industries, Inc.'s net income of $3.3M. Notably, NewHydrogen, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 45.05x while SIFCO Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NewHydrogen, Inc. is -- versus 0.48x for SIFCO Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.